Networking · head to head
OpenVPN vs Pop!_OS

OpenVPN
Networking
Open source VPN protocol with a commercial Access Server product priced per simultaneous connection
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

Pop!_OS
Operating Systems
Ubuntu-based Linux distribution tuned for developers and GPU work
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: OpenVPN open source OpenVPN, while free, requires real technical skill to configure, secure and maintain without the Access Server admin layer; Pop!_OS built primarily around System76 hardware, so other machines get less attention
- They diverge on capability: OpenVPN covers Open source core, Pop!_OS covers NVIDIA ISO.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which OpenVPN and Pop!_OS actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in OpenVPN
- Open source core
- Access Server admin UI
- Per-connection licensing
- Free tier
- Cross-platform clients
Only in Pop!_OS
- NVIDIA ISO
- Auto-tiling
- Pop!_Shop
- Ubuntu base
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
OpenVPN
- A technical team wanting a fully free, self-configured VPN server using the open source protocol without any vendor relationshipnot Pop!_OS
- A small business wanting a supported, easier-to-administer VPN server, willing to pay per concurrent connection rather than per employeenot Pop!_OS
- An organisation with more staff than typical concurrent VPN usage, since Access Server bills only active simultaneous connections, not total accountsnot Pop!_OS
- An IoT or large-scale deployment needing custom Enterprise pricing above 2,000 connectionsnot Pop!_OS
Pop!_OS
- Machine learning and graphics work needing NVIDIA drivers that work on first bootnot OpenVPN
- Developers who want tiling without configuring a window managernot OpenVPN
- System76 hardware, which it is built aroundnot OpenVPN
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
OpenVPN
- Open source OpenVPN, while free, requires real technical skill to configure, secure and maintain without the Access Server admin layer
- Per-connection billing on Access Server means usage spikes, such as an all-hands remote day, can push simultaneous connections over a licensed limit and block new connections until usage drops or the plan is upgraded
- OpenVPN's traditional hub-and-spoke architecture routes traffic through a central server, unlike mesh VPN tools like Tailscale or NetBird that establish direct peer-to-peer connections where possible, which can add latency
- Client configuration and certificate management for the open source version is more manual and error-prone than newer VPN tools with zero-config onboarding
- Access Server pricing above the Growth tier reverts to custom Enterprise quoting, so very large deployments lose the pricing transparency of the lower tiers
- The protocol's throughput is generally lower than newer kernel-integrated protocols like WireGuard under equivalent conditions, which matters for high-bandwidth use cases
Pop!_OS
- Built primarily around System76 hardware, so other machines get less attention
- Based on Ubuntu LTS, so packages lag current upstream
- A smaller team than Ubuntu or Fedora, and releases have sometimes slipped well behind the Ubuntu base
- The COSMIC desktop rewrite has been a long transition with the older GNOME-based version in maintenance
Pricing, plan by plan
OpenVPN
Free- Access Server FreeFree
- Up to 2 simultaneous connections
- All features included
- Access Server Growth$7/month
- Per simultaneous connection beyond the free tier
- Annual billing
- Access Server Enterprise/IoT$undefined/month
- Custom pricing for 2,000+ connections
Pop!_OS
Free- Pop!_OSFree
- Full functionality
- Commercial use permitted
- Community support
Which should you pick?
Choose OpenVPN if
- You need open source core.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, Windows, macOS, iOS, Android.
- You also want access server admin ui.
Choose Pop!_OS if
- You need nvidia iso.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, Desktop.
- You also want auto-tiling.
Questions people ask
- Is OpenVPN or Pop!_OS better?
- Neither clearly leads. OpenVPN starts at Free and Pop!_OS at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, OpenVPN or Pop!_OS?
- OpenVPN starts at Free and Pop!_OS at Free.
- Does OpenVPN or Pop!_OS run on more platforms?
- OpenVPN runs on Linux, Windows, macOS, iOS, Android. Pop!_OS runs on Linux, Desktop.
- Can I use OpenVPN for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is OpenVPN best used for?
- OpenVPN is most often used for a technical team wanting a fully free, self-configured vpn server using the open source protocol without any vendor relationship, a small business wanting a supported, easier-to-administer vpn server, willing to pay per concurrent connection rather than per employee, an organisation with more staff than typical concurrent vpn usage, since access server bills only active simultaneous connections, not total accounts, an iot or large-scale deployment needing custom enterprise pricing above 2,000 connections. Of those, a technical team wanting a fully free, self-configured vpn server using the open source protocol without any vendor relationship and a small business wanting a supported, easier-to-administer vpn server, willing to pay per concurrent connection rather than per employee are not what Pop!_OS is typically brought in for.
- What can OpenVPN do that Pop!_OS cannot?
- OpenVPN covers Open source core, Access Server admin UI, Per-connection licensing, Free tier. Pop!_OS covers NVIDIA ISO, Auto-tiling, Pop!_Shop, Ubuntu base.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
OpenVPN: Is OpenVPN free?
The open source protocol and software are free under the GPL; Access Server, the commercial packaged product, charges per simultaneous connection beyond a free 2-connection tier.
Pop!_OS: Is Pop!_OS free?
Yes, free and open source. System76 funds it through hardware sales.
OpenVPN: What counts as a connection for billing purposes?
A simultaneously active connected device, not a registered user account or total device count; unlimited accounts and devices can be created but only the licensed number can be connected at once.
Pop!_OS: Why is there a separate NVIDIA download?
It ships with the proprietary GPU drivers already installed and working, which removes the most common first-day failure on Linux for GPU work.
OpenVPN: How does OpenVPN compare with WireGuard-based tools like Tailscale?
OpenVPN uses a traditional hub-and-spoke VPN architecture rather than the mesh, peer-to-peer approach used by newer tools like Tailscale or NetBird.
Pop!_OS: Is it just Ubuntu?
It is based on Ubuntu LTS and uses its repositories, with a different desktop, tiling, an NVIDIA image and System76 tuning on top.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- OpenVPN vs pfSense
- OpenVPN vs ZeroTier
- OpenVPN vs MikroTik RouterOS
- OpenVPN vs Tailscale
- OpenVPN vs Icinga
- OpenVPN vs Zabbix
- OpenVPN vs Domotz
- OpenVPN vs LibreNMS
- OpenVPN vs Eclipse Mosquitto
- OpenVPN vs Twingate
- OpenVPN vs Consul
- OpenVPN vs OPNsense
- OpenVPN vs Nebula
- OpenVPN vs ngrok
- OpenVPN vs Palo Alto Networks
- OpenVPN vs Splunk
- OpenVPN vs Ubuntu
- OpenVPN vs Linux Mint
- OpenVPN vs Debian
- OpenVPN vs Red Hat Enterprise Linux
- OpenVPN vs Manjaro
- OpenVPN vs Qubes OS
- OpenVPN vs Fedora
- OpenVPN vs Arch Linux
- OpenVPN vs FreeBSD
- OpenVPN vs Alpine Linux
- OpenVPN vs AlmaLinux
- OpenVPN vs NixOS
- OpenVPN vs OpenWrt
- OpenVPN vs Rocky Linux
- Pop!_OS vs pfSense
- Pop!_OS vs ZeroTier
- Pop!_OS vs MikroTik RouterOS
- Pop!_OS vs Tailscale
- Pop!_OS vs Icinga
- Pop!_OS vs Zabbix
- Pop!_OS vs Domotz
- Pop!_OS vs LibreNMS
- Pop!_OS vs Eclipse Mosquitto
- Pop!_OS vs Twingate
- Pop!_OS vs Consul
- Pop!_OS vs OPNsense
- Pop!_OS vs Nebula
- Pop!_OS vs ngrok
- Pop!_OS vs Palo Alto Networks
- Pop!_OS vs Splunk
- Pop!_OS vs Ubuntu
- Pop!_OS vs Linux Mint
- Pop!_OS vs Debian
- Pop!_OS vs Red Hat Enterprise Linux
- Pop!_OS vs Manjaro
- Pop!_OS vs Qubes OS
- Pop!_OS vs Fedora
- Pop!_OS vs Arch Linux
- Pop!_OS vs FreeBSD
- Pop!_OS vs Alpine Linux
- Pop!_OS vs AlmaLinux
- Pop!_OS vs NixOS
- Pop!_OS vs OpenWrt
- Pop!_OS vs Rocky Linux
