Developer Tools · head to head
Okteto vs Zeabur

Okteto
Developer Tools
Runs production-like development environments on your own Kubernetes cluster
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes

Zeabur
Cloud
AI-powered cloud deployment platform for developers
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Okteto two of the three plans publish no price at all, with no currency and no billing period stated anywhere, so any budget above five seats requires a sales conversation before you can even compare it with an alternative.; Zeabur free plan limited to single server with 48-hour log retention
- They diverge on capability: Okteto covers Cluster development environments, Zeabur covers AI Agent.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Okteto and Zeabur actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Okteto
- Cluster development environments
- File synchronisation
- Development containers
- Environment catalogue
- Preview environments
- Bring your own cloud
Only in Zeabur
- AI Agent
- Managed Servers
- Domain and DNS Management
- Email Service
- AI Hub
- Deploy Templates
- Git Integration
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Okteto
- A microservices estate where no developer can run the full dependency graph on a laptopnot Zeabur
- Giving each pull request a working environment reviewers can click rather than describenot Zeabur
- Letting coding agents build and test against real databases and queues instead of mocksnot Zeabur
- Removing a fleet of local Kubernetes installations that drift from production and produce false test resultsnot Zeabur
Zeabur
- Deploying full-stack web applications without DevOps expertisenot Okteto
- Building AI agent infrastructure with integrated API accessnot Okteto
- Managing multi-region deployments with automated scalingnot Okteto
- Running containerized services with built-in domain and emailnot Okteto
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Okteto
- Two of the three plans publish no price at all, with no currency and no billing period stated anywhere, so any budget above five seats requires a sales conversation before you can even compare it with an alternative.
- The Apache-2.0 CLI is restricted to the development section of the manifest, so build services, user management and observability all require the commercial platform and the open licence provides very little continuity insurance.
- The last disclosed funding round is a 15 million US dollar Series A from February 2022 with nothing announced since, and the contributor base is dominated by company employees, which is concentrated risk for something embedded in every developer daily loop.
- You must bring and pay for the Kubernetes cluster, so node cost, capacity planning and version upgrades stay with your platform team on top of the licence fee.
- The 2026 repositioning towards AI agents means the classic developer inner loop is no longer what the marketing leads with, so a buyer purchasing that use case should confirm roadmap commitment rather than assume it.
Zeabur
- Free plan limited to single server with 48-hour log retention
- Small team size may limit support and feature velocity
- Building spec upgrades limited on lower tiers
- Enterprise support not clearly documented
Pricing, plan by plan
Okteto
Free- StarterFree
- 5 seats included
- Self-hosted deployment into your own cluster
- Community support
- Scale$undefined/year
- Contact sales, no price, currency or billing period published
- More seats and environments than Starter
- Self-hosted deployment
- Enterprise$undefined/year
- Contact sales, no price published
- Bring your own cloud deployment
- Available through Google Cloud and AWS marketplaces
Zeabur
Free- FreeFree
- 1 manageable server
- 2C4G build specs
- 48-hour log retention
- Dev$5/month
- 3 manageable servers
- 7-day log retention
- 250 MB file uploads
- Pro$19/month
- 10 manageable servers
- 4C8G build specs
- 30-day log retention
- Team$79/month
- 3 included seats
- Unlimited manageable servers
- 90-day log retention
Which should you pick?
Choose Okteto if
- You need cluster development environments.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, macOS, Windows, CLI, Kubernetes, Web.
- You also want file synchronisation.
Choose Zeabur if
- You need ai agent.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, CLI.
- You also want managed servers.
Questions people ask
- Is Okteto or Zeabur better?
- Neither clearly leads. Okteto starts at Free and Zeabur at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Okteto or Zeabur?
- Okteto starts at Free and Zeabur at Free.
- Does Okteto or Zeabur run on more platforms?
- Okteto runs on Linux, macOS, Windows, CLI, Kubernetes, Web. Zeabur runs on Web, CLI.
- Can I use Okteto for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Okteto best used for?
- Okteto is most often used for a microservices estate where no developer can run the full dependency graph on a laptop, giving each pull request a working environment reviewers can click rather than describe, letting coding agents build and test against real databases and queues instead of mocks, removing a fleet of local kubernetes installations that drift from production and produce false test results. Of those, a microservices estate where no developer can run the full dependency graph on a laptop and giving each pull request a working environment reviewers can click rather than describe are not what Zeabur is typically brought in for.
- What can Okteto do that Zeabur cannot?
- Okteto covers Cluster development environments, File synchronisation, Development containers, Environment catalogue. Zeabur covers AI Agent, Managed Servers, Domain and DNS Management, Email Service.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Okteto: Is Okteto open source?
The CLI is Apache-2.0, but the README states it supports only the development section of the manifest. Everything operationally interesting, including builds, user management and observability, is in the commercial platform.
Zeabur: What is included in the free plan?
The free plan includes 1 manageable server, 2C4G build specifications, 48-hour log retention, 50 MB file upload limit, and community support.
SourceOkteto: What does it cost?
Only the free Starter tier with five seats is published. Scale and Enterprise are both contact sales, with no price, currency or billing period disclosed on the pricing page.
Zeabur: How do additional seats work on the Team plan?
The Team plan includes 3 seats with additional seats available at $24 per seat per month.
SourceOkteto: Do I need my own Kubernetes cluster?
Yes. Okteto installs into a cluster you provide and pay for, so capacity, upgrades and node costs remain your responsibility in addition to the licence.
Zeabur: Is there a free trial period?
The Dev and Pro plans include 14 days free before billing begins.
SourceOkteto: How is this different from running Kubernetes locally?
Environments run against the same managed databases, queues and service mesh as production, so a class of failures that only appears in a real cluster is caught before merge rather than after deploy.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Okteto vs Tilt
- Okteto vs Garden
- Okteto vs Argo CD
- Okteto vs Atlantis
- Okteto vs Nix
- Okteto vs Spacelift
- Okteto vs ConfigCat
- Okteto vs Restate
- Okteto vs Helm
- Okteto vs StackBlitz
- Okteto vs Avo
- Okteto vs Cloud Native Buildpacks
- Okteto vs Nixpacks
- Okteto vs Octopus Deploy
- Okteto vs OpsLevel
- Okteto vs PartyKit
- Okteto vs PhpStorm
- Okteto vs Railway
- Okteto vs Fly.io
- Okteto vs Porter
- Okteto vs Encore
- Okteto vs Vultr
- Okteto vs Hetzner Cloud
- Okteto vs AWS (Amazon Web Services)
- Okteto vs Linode
- Okteto vs Google Cloud Platform
- Okteto vs Microsoft Azure
- Okteto vs Coolify
- Okteto vs Wasabi
- Okteto vs Terragrunt
- Okteto vs Thanos
- Okteto vs Zipkin
- Okteto vs Anyscale
- Okteto vs DeepInfra
- Okteto vs Lambda (AWS Serverless)
- Zeabur vs Tilt
- Zeabur vs Garden
- Zeabur vs Argo CD
- Zeabur vs Atlantis
- Zeabur vs Nix
- Zeabur vs Spacelift
- Zeabur vs ConfigCat
- Zeabur vs Restate
- Zeabur vs Helm
- Zeabur vs StackBlitz
- Zeabur vs Avo
- Zeabur vs Cloud Native Buildpacks
- Zeabur vs Nixpacks
- Zeabur vs Octopus Deploy
- Zeabur vs OpsLevel
- Zeabur vs PartyKit
- Zeabur vs PhpStorm
- Zeabur vs Railway
- Zeabur vs Fly.io
- Zeabur vs Porter
- Zeabur vs Encore
- Zeabur vs Vultr
- Zeabur vs Hetzner Cloud
- Zeabur vs AWS (Amazon Web Services)
- Zeabur vs Linode
- Zeabur vs Google Cloud Platform
- Zeabur vs Microsoft Azure
- Zeabur vs Coolify
- Zeabur vs Wasabi
- Zeabur vs Terragrunt
- Zeabur vs Thanos
- Zeabur vs Zipkin
- Zeabur vs Anyscale
- Zeabur vs DeepInfra
- Zeabur vs Lambda (AWS Serverless)
