Developer Tools · head to head
Octopus Deploy vs Steampipe

Octopus Deploy
Developer Tools
Continuous delivery and runbook automation for releases
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

Steampipe
Developer Tools
Query cloud APIs, SaaS tools and code with SQL, with no extract or load step
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Octopus Deploy free tier caps at 10 projects, 10 tenants, 10 machines, 10 users, 5 concurrent tasks and 1 space; Steampipe aGPL-3.0 across all four engines is a procurement blocker at organisations that ban the licence outright, and the network clause reaches any internal portal or service that puts a web interface in front of it.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Octopus Deploy and Steampipe actually diverge.
| Attribute | Octopus Deploy | Steampipe |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | subscription | Open source, with paid hosting through Turbot Pipes |
| Platforms | Web | macOS, Linux, Windows, Docker, Web |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Developer Tools).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Octopus Deploy
Nothing recorded that Steampipe does not also cover.
Only in Steampipe
- SQL over live APIs
- Wide plugin set
- Embedded Postgres
- Compliance benchmarks
- Joins across providers
- Hosted option
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Octopus Deploy
- Automating software deployments across development, testing, productionnot Steampipe
- Automating emergency tasks like website failover and incident responsenot Steampipe
- Managing multi-tenant deployments without duplicating configurationnot Steampipe
- Tracking DORA metrics and enforcing deployment approval gatesnot Steampipe
Steampipe
- Security teams answering posture questions against live cloud accounts rather than a nightly exportnot Octopus Deploy
- Compliance evidence gathering where the answer must reflect the account at the moment it is askednot Octopus Deploy
- Inventory and drift questions spanning several cloud providers in one querynot Octopus Deploy
- Engineers who would rather write SQL than learn each provider command line toolnot Octopus Deploy
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Octopus Deploy
- Free tier caps at 10 projects, 10 tenants, 10 machines, 10 users, 5 concurrent tasks and 1 space
- Annual billing is the only option for both Octopus Cloud and Octopus Server; there is no monthly plan
- Professional cloud tier is $4,330 per year and Enterprise cloud is $24,600 per year, with tenants and machines sold as add-ons beyond the free allotment
Steampipe
- AGPL-3.0 across all four engines is a procurement blocker at organisations that ban the licence outright, and the network clause reaches any internal portal or service that puts a web interface in front of it.
- Dashboards, benchmarks and mods were removed from Steampipe entirely at version 1.0 in October 2024 and now live in a separate product, so pre-2024 documentation and tutorials describe commands that no longer exist.
- Live querying is bound by cloud provider API rate limits and keeps no persistent store by default, which is why a separate DuckDB-backed product exists for log volumes and why large accounts return slowly.
- The company is fifteen people and bootstrapped, maintaining four command line tools plus a hosted service plus two further products, and the newer tools have thin community traction relative to that surface area.
- Hosted tiers include only three users regardless of tier, with additional Enterprise users charged separately, so a team of thirty costs an order of magnitude more than the headline figure before compute and storage are counted.
Pricing, plan by plan
Octopus Deploy
Free- FreeFree
- 10 projects
- 10 tenants
- 10 machines
- Professional (Cloud)$4330/year
- Up to 100 projects
- Unlimited spaces and users
- Tenants and machines available as add-ons
- Professional (Server)$2080/year
- Up to 100 projects
- Unlimited spaces and users
- Tenants and machines available as add-ons
- Enterprise (Cloud)$24600/year
- 100+ projects supported
- Unlimited spaces and users
- 20 concurrent tasks
Steampipe
Free- Steampipe CLIFree
- AGPL-3.0
- All plugins
- No user or query limits
- Pipes DeveloperFree
- One user
- 400 compute minutes
- 3GB storage
- Pipes Team$49/month
- Three users
- 2,000 compute minutes
- 20GB storage
- Pipes Enterprise$249/month
- Three users
- 10,000 compute minutes
- 100GB storage
Which should you pick?
Choose Steampipe if
- You need sql over live apis.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on macOS, Linux, Windows, Docker, Web.
- You also want wide plugin set.
Questions people ask
- Is Octopus Deploy or Steampipe better?
- Neither clearly leads. Octopus Deploy starts at Free and Steampipe at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Octopus Deploy or Steampipe?
- Octopus Deploy starts at Free and Steampipe at Free.
- Does Octopus Deploy or Steampipe run on more platforms?
- Octopus Deploy runs on Web. Steampipe runs on macOS, Linux, Windows, Docker, Web.
- Can I use Octopus Deploy for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Octopus Deploy best used for?
- Octopus Deploy is most often used for automating software deployments across development, testing, production, automating emergency tasks like website failover and incident response, managing multi-tenant deployments without duplicating configuration, tracking dora metrics and enforcing deployment approval gates. Of those, automating software deployments across development, testing, production and automating emergency tasks like website failover and incident response are not what Steampipe is typically brought in for.
- What can Octopus Deploy do that Steampipe cannot?
- Steampipe covers SQL over live APIs, Wide plugin set, Embedded Postgres, Compliance benchmarks.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Octopus Deploy: How much does Octopus Deploy cost?
Octopus Deploy offers a free tier at $0/year with limits on projects (10), users (10), and tenants (10). Professional plans start at $2,080/year for self-hosted or $4,330/year for cloud hosting.
SourceSteampipe: When did Steampipe become AGPL?
May 2021, about four months after the project went public. It is a settled licence rather than a recent change, and predates the Business Source Licence wave it is often confused with.
Octopus Deploy: What does the free Octopus Deploy tier include?
The free tier includes 10 projects, 10 tenants, 10 machines, 10 users, 5 concurrent tasks, 1TB file storage, 100GB database storage, and community support only.
SourceSteampipe: Where did the dashboards and benchmarks go?
Into Powerpipe. They were deprecated in March 2024 and removed from Steampipe at version 1.0 in October 2024, so the check, dashboard, mod and variable commands are gone.
Octopus Deploy: Can I try Octopus Deploy for free before purchasing?
Yes, a free tier is available with unlimited duration but capped usage, plus a 30-day free trial with full Enterprise features is offered to evaluate the platform.
SourceSteampipe: Is it fast on a large cloud estate?
Not always. Queries call provider APIs at request time, so rate limits rather than query planning set the pace, and there is no persistent store by default.
Octopus Deploy: What are the Enterprise pricing differences between Cloud and Server hosting?
Enterprise Cloud hosting costs $24,600/year and includes 20 concurrent tasks and 24/7 support. Enterprise Server self-hosted costs $15,600/year with flexible concurrent task configuration and 24/7 support.
SourceSteampipe: Does the AGPL affect internal use?
Running it internally for your own analysis is fine. Putting a web interface in front of it that other people use is where the network clause becomes a question for your legal team.
Steampipe: Is a bootstrapped vendor a risk?
It cuts both ways. There is no investor pressure toward a licence change or an exit, and there are also fifteen people supporting a large product surface.
Related pages
More on Octopus Deploy
Other head to heads
- Octopus Deploy vs Visual Studio Code
- Octopus Deploy vs ESLint
- Octopus Deploy vs pnpm
- Octopus Deploy vs Turborepo
- Octopus Deploy vs Harness
- Octopus Deploy vs HCP Terraform
- Octopus Deploy vs Earthly
- Octopus Deploy vs Moonrepo
- Octopus Deploy vs Ansible
- Octopus Deploy vs Argo CD
- Octopus Deploy vs Garden
- Octopus Deploy vs GitLab CI/CD
- Octopus Deploy vs Namespace
- Octopus Deploy vs Nix
- Octopus Deploy vs Nixpacks
- Octopus Deploy vs Okteto
- Octopus Deploy vs OpsLevel
- Octopus Deploy vs PartyKit
- Octopus Deploy vs Atlantis
- Octopus Deploy vs Jitsu
- Octopus Deploy vs Frappe
- Octopus Deploy vs Penpot
- Octopus Deploy vs GNU Emacs
- Octopus Deploy vs Bazel
- Octopus Deploy vs Eclipse IDE
- Octopus Deploy vs Pants Build
- Octopus Deploy vs Swagger UI
- Octopus Deploy vs Helix
- Octopus Deploy vs JFrog Artifactory
- Steampipe vs Visual Studio Code
- Steampipe vs ESLint
- Steampipe vs pnpm
- Steampipe vs Turborepo
- Steampipe vs Harness
- Steampipe vs HCP Terraform
- Steampipe vs Earthly
- Steampipe vs Moonrepo
- Steampipe vs Ansible
- Steampipe vs Argo CD
- Steampipe vs Garden
- Steampipe vs GitLab CI/CD
- Steampipe vs Namespace
- Steampipe vs Nix
- Steampipe vs Nixpacks
- Steampipe vs Okteto
- Steampipe vs OpsLevel
- Steampipe vs PartyKit
- Steampipe vs Atlantis
- Steampipe vs Jitsu
- Steampipe vs Frappe
- Steampipe vs Penpot
- Steampipe vs GNU Emacs
- Steampipe vs Bazel
- Steampipe vs Eclipse IDE
- Steampipe vs Pants Build
- Steampipe vs Swagger UI
- Steampipe vs Helix
- Steampipe vs JFrog Artifactory
