Library & Archives · head to head
OCLC WorldShare Management Services vs SirsiDynix Symphony
OCLC WorldShare Management Services
Library & Archives
Cloud-based library management built on WorldCat
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
S
SirsiDynix Symphony
Library & Archives
Enterprise library management for any size library
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: OCLC WorldShare Management Services pricing is not published for WorldShare Management Services; the site routes buyers to a Library Services Consultant rather than listing figures; SirsiDynix Symphony the full desktop functionality lives in the local WorkFlows client, with SymphonyWeb as the browser alternative rather than the default
- They diverge on capability: OCLC WorldShare Management Services covers WorldCat cataloging, SirsiDynix Symphony covers MARC cataloging.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which OCLC WorldShare Management Services and SirsiDynix Symphony actually diverge.
| Attribute | OCLC WorldShare Management Services | SirsiDynix Symphony |
|---|---|---|
| Platforms | Web, Mobile, Api | Web, Desktop, Mobile, Api |
| Founded | 1967 | 1979 |
Identical on both: starting price (On request), pricing model (subscription), free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Library & Archives).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in OCLC WorldShare Management Services
- WorldCat cataloging
- Acquisitions and invoicing
- License management
- Analytics and reporting
- Interlibrary loan
- WorldCat Discovery
- Mobile circulation
- Request management
Only in SirsiDynix Symphony
- MARC cataloging
- Acquisitions
- Serials management
- Patron management
- OPAC
- Reports and analytics
- Self-check integration
- Mobile apps
Both cover
- Circulation management
- SOC2
- SSO
- Cloud deployment
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
OCLC WorldShare Management Services
- Libraries relying on the shared WorldCat catalog for cataloging and resource sharingnot SirsiDynix Symphony
SirsiDynix Symphony
- Integrated library system for public and academic librariesnot OCLC WorldShare Management Services
- Cataloguing, circulation and acquisitionsnot OCLC WorldShare Management Services
- Consortium-wide catalogues shared across member librariesnot OCLC WorldShare Management Services
- K-12 and special library collection managementnot OCLC WorldShare Management Services
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
OCLC WorldShare Management Services
- Pricing is not published for WorldShare Management Services; the site routes buyers to a Library Services Consultant rather than listing figures
SirsiDynix Symphony
- The full desktop functionality lives in the local WorkFlows client, with SymphonyWeb as the browser alternative rather than the default
- Pricing is not published
Pricing, plan by plan
OCLC WorldShare Management Services
On request- WMS Standard$undefined/year
- WorldCat cataloging
- Circulation management
- Acquisitions
- WMS Premium$undefined/year
- Everything in Standard
- License Manager
- Advanced analytics
SirsiDynix Symphony
On request- Symphony Standard$undefined/year
- Circulation management
- Cataloging
- OPAC
- Symphony Professional$undefined/year
- Everything in Standard
- Acquisitions
- Serials management
- Symphony Enterprise$undefined/year
- Everything in Professional
- BLUEcloud integration
- Analytics
Which should you pick?
Choose OCLC WorldShare Management Services if
- You need worldcat cataloging.
- You work on Web, Mobile, Api.
- You also want acquisitions and invoicing.
Choose SirsiDynix Symphony if
- You need marc cataloging.
- You work on Web, Desktop, Mobile, Api.
- You also want acquisitions.
Questions people ask
- Is OCLC WorldShare Management Services or SirsiDynix Symphony better?
- Neither clearly leads. OCLC WorldShare Management Services starts at On request and SirsiDynix Symphony at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, OCLC WorldShare Management Services or SirsiDynix Symphony?
- OCLC WorldShare Management Services starts at On request and SirsiDynix Symphony at On request.
- Does OCLC WorldShare Management Services or SirsiDynix Symphony run on more platforms?
- OCLC WorldShare Management Services runs on Web, Mobile, Api. SirsiDynix Symphony runs on Web, Desktop, Mobile, Api.
- What is OCLC WorldShare Management Services best used for?
- OCLC WorldShare Management Services is most often used for libraries relying on the shared worldcat catalog for cataloging and resource sharing. Of those, libraries relying on the shared worldcat catalog for cataloging and resource sharing is not what SirsiDynix Symphony is typically brought in for.
- What can OCLC WorldShare Management Services do that SirsiDynix Symphony cannot?
- OCLC WorldShare Management Services covers WorldCat cataloging, Acquisitions and invoicing, License management, Analytics and reporting. SirsiDynix Symphony covers MARC cataloging, Acquisitions, Serials management, Patron management. Both handle Circulation management, SOC2, SSO, Cloud deployment.