Softwr

Library & Archives · head to head

FOLIO vs OCLC WorldShare Management Services

FOLIO logo

FOLIO

Library & Archives

The open source library services platform reimagined

From
Free
Rated
-
Full reviewWebsite
OCLC WorldShare Management Services logo

OCLC WorldShare Management Services

Library & Archives

Cloud-based library management built on WorldCat

From
On request
Rated
-
Full reviewWebsite

The short version

  • Only FOLIO has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
  • Each has a real cost: FOLIO fOLIO is open source with no vendor-run SaaS from the FOLIO project itself; adopters must self-host or contract a third-party hosting partner separately.; OCLC WorldShare Management Services pricing is not published for WorldShare Management Services; the site routes buyers to a Library Services Consultant rather than listing figures
  • They diverge on capability: FOLIO covers Modular app architecture, OCLC WorldShare Management Services covers WorldCat cataloging.

Where they differ

Only the attributes on which FOLIO and OCLC WorldShare Management Services actually diverge.

Attributes where FOLIO and OCLC WorldShare Management Services differ
AttributeFOLIOOCLC WorldShare Management Services
Starting priceFreeOn request
Pricing modelopen-sourcesubscription
Free tierYesNo
PlatformsWeb, ApiWeb, Mobile, Api
Founded20161967

Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (Library & Archives).

What each one covers

Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.

Only in FOLIO

  • Modular app architecture
  • Circulation and check-out
  • Inventory and cataloging
  • Electronic resource management
  • User management
  • Agreements and licenses
  • Course reserves
  • Custom app development

Only in OCLC WorldShare Management Services

  • WorldCat cataloging
  • Circulation management
  • License management
  • Analytics and reporting
  • Interlibrary loan
  • WorldCat Discovery
  • Mobile circulation
  • Request management

Both cover

  • Acquisitions and invoicing
  • SSO

What people use each for

The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.

FOLIO

  • Academic library managementnot OCLC WorldShare Management Services
  • Custom library applicationsnot OCLC WorldShare Management Services
  • Consortial systemsnot OCLC WorldShare Management Services
  • Electronic resource managementnot OCLC WorldShare Management Services

OCLC WorldShare Management Services

  • Libraries relying on the shared WorldCat catalog for cataloging and resource sharingnot FOLIO

Where each one falls short

Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.

FOLIO

  • FOLIO is open source with no vendor-run SaaS from the FOLIO project itself; adopters must self-host or contract a third-party hosting partner separately.

OCLC WorldShare Management Services

  • Pricing is not published for WorldShare Management Services; the site routes buyers to a Library Services Consultant rather than listing figures

Pricing, plan by plan

FOLIO

Free
  • Community EditionFree
    • Modular app ecosystem
    • Circulation management
    • Cataloging
  • Hosted (via EBSCO/Index Data)$undefined/year
    • Everything in Community
    • Managed hosting
    • Professional support

OCLC WorldShare Management Services

On request
  • WMS Standard$undefined/year
    • WorldCat cataloging
    • Circulation management
    • Acquisitions
  • WMS Premium$undefined/year
    • Everything in Standard
    • License Manager
    • Advanced analytics

Which should you pick?

Choose FOLIO if

  • You need modular app architecture.
  • You want to start without paying.
  • You work on Web, Api.
  • You also want circulation and check-out.
FOLIO review

Choose OCLC WorldShare Management Services if

  • You need worldcat cataloging.
  • You work on Web, Mobile, Api.
  • You also want circulation management.
OCLC WorldShare Management Services review

Questions people ask

Is FOLIO or OCLC WorldShare Management Services better?
Neither clearly leads. FOLIO starts at Free and OCLC WorldShare Management Services at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
Which is cheaper, FOLIO or OCLC WorldShare Management Services?
FOLIO has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for FOLIO and On request for OCLC WorldShare Management Services.
Does FOLIO or OCLC WorldShare Management Services run on more platforms?
FOLIO runs on Web, Api. OCLC WorldShare Management Services runs on Web, Mobile, Api.
Can I use FOLIO for free?
Yes. FOLIO has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. OCLC WorldShare Management Services starts at On request.
What is FOLIO best used for?
FOLIO is most often used for academic library management, custom library applications, consortial systems, electronic resource management. Of those, academic library management and custom library applications are not what OCLC WorldShare Management Services is typically brought in for.
What can FOLIO do that OCLC WorldShare Management Services cannot?
FOLIO covers Modular app architecture, Circulation and check-out, Inventory and cataloging, Electronic resource management. OCLC WorldShare Management Services covers WorldCat cataloging, Circulation management, License management, Analytics and reporting. Both handle Acquisitions and invoicing, SSO.
ShareXLinkedInRedditWhatsAppEmail

Related pages

More on FOLIO

More on OCLC WorldShare Management Services

Keep looking

Other head to heads