Softwr

Library & Archives · head to head

Koha vs OCLC WorldShare Management Services

Koha logo

Koha

Library & Archives

The world's first free and open source library system

From
Free
Rated
-
OCLC WorldShare Management Services logo

OCLC WorldShare Management Services

Library & Archives

Cloud-based library management built on WorldCat

From
On request
Rated
-

The short version

  • Only Koha has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
  • Each has a real cost: Koha no official vendor exists; hosting, support and development come only from third-party providers in a community directory that explicitly carries no official status; OCLC WorldShare Management Services pricing is not published for WorldShare Management Services; the site routes buyers to a Library Services Consultant rather than listing figures
  • They diverge on capability: Koha covers MARC21/UNIMARC cataloging, OCLC WorldShare Management Services covers WorldCat cataloging.

Where they differ

Only the attributes on which Koha and OCLC WorldShare Management Services actually diverge.

Attributes where Koha and OCLC WorldShare Management Services differ
AttributeKohaOCLC WorldShare Management Services
Starting priceFreeOn request
Pricing modelopen-sourcesubscription
Free tierYesNo
PlatformsWeb, ApiWeb, Mobile, Api
Founded19991967

Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (Library & Archives).

What each one covers

Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.

Only in Koha

  • MARC21/UNIMARC cataloging
  • Acquisitions
  • Serials management
  • Patron management
  • OPAC with faceted search
  • Reports and statistics
  • Z39.50 support
  • SIP2 integration

Only in OCLC WorldShare Management Services

  • WorldCat cataloging
  • Acquisitions and invoicing
  • License management
  • Analytics and reporting
  • Interlibrary loan
  • WorldCat Discovery
  • Mobile circulation
  • Request management

Both cover

  • Circulation management
  • Cloud deployment

What people use each for

The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.

Koha

  • Libraries self-hosting an open source integrated library system for cataloging and circulation without vendor licensing feesnot OCLC WorldShare Management Services

OCLC WorldShare Management Services

  • Libraries relying on the shared WorldCat catalog for cataloging and resource sharingnot Koha

Where each one falls short

Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.

Koha

  • No official vendor exists; hosting, support and development come only from third-party providers in a community directory that explicitly carries no official status

OCLC WorldShare Management Services

  • Pricing is not published for WorldShare Management Services; the site routes buyers to a Library Services Consultant rather than listing figures

Pricing, plan by plan

Koha

Free
  • Self-HostedFree
    • Full ILS functionality
    • Circulation management
    • Cataloging (MARC21/UNIMARC)
  • Hosted (via partners)$150/month
    • Everything in Self-Hosted
    • Managed hosting
    • Professional support

OCLC WorldShare Management Services

On request
  • WMS Standard$undefined/year
    • WorldCat cataloging
    • Circulation management
    • Acquisitions
  • WMS Premium$undefined/year
    • Everything in Standard
    • License Manager
    • Advanced analytics

Which should you pick?

Choose Koha if

  • You need marc21/unimarc cataloging.
  • You want to start without paying.
  • You work on Web, Api.
  • You also want acquisitions.

Choose OCLC WorldShare Management Services if

  • You need worldcat cataloging.
  • You work on Web, Mobile, Api.
  • You also want acquisitions and invoicing.

Questions people ask

Is Koha or OCLC WorldShare Management Services better?
Neither clearly leads. Koha starts at Free and OCLC WorldShare Management Services at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
Which is cheaper, Koha or OCLC WorldShare Management Services?
Koha has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for Koha and On request for OCLC WorldShare Management Services.
Does Koha or OCLC WorldShare Management Services run on more platforms?
Koha runs on Web, Api. OCLC WorldShare Management Services runs on Web, Mobile, Api.
Can I use Koha for free?
Yes. Koha has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. OCLC WorldShare Management Services starts at On request.
What is Koha best used for?
Koha is most often used for libraries self-hosting an open source integrated library system for cataloging and circulation without vendor licensing fees. Of those, libraries self-hosting an open source integrated library system for cataloging and circulation without vendor licensing fees is not what OCLC WorldShare Management Services is typically brought in for.
What can Koha do that OCLC WorldShare Management Services cannot?
Koha covers MARC21/UNIMARC cataloging, Acquisitions, Serials management, Patron management. OCLC WorldShare Management Services covers WorldCat cataloging, Acquisitions and invoicing, License management, Analytics and reporting. Both handle Circulation management, Cloud deployment.

Related pages