Softwr

Cloud & Infrastructure · head to head

Lambda (AWS Serverless) vs Nomad

Lambda (AWS Serverless) logo

Lambda (AWS Serverless)

Cloud & Infrastructure

Run code without thinking about servers

From
Free
Rated
-
Nomad logo

Nomad

Cloud & Infrastructure

Flexible workload orchestration

From
Free
Rated
-

The short version

  • Each has a real cost: Lambda (AWS Serverless) billed on two axes at once, $0.20 per million requests plus $0.0000166667 per GB-second of duration, so memory settings change the bill as much as traffic does; Nomad nomad 1.7.0 and later is licensed under the Business Source License 1.1 with IBM Corporation as licensor, not an OSI open source licence
  • They diverge on capability: Lambda (AWS Serverless) covers Function-as-a-Service, Nomad covers Container orchestration.

Where they differ

Only the attributes on which Lambda (AWS Serverless) and Nomad actually diverge.

Attributes where Lambda (AWS Serverless) and Nomad differ
AttributeLambda (AWS Serverless)Nomad
Pricing modelusage-basedopen-source
PlatformsWeb, ApiLinux, Windows, Mac, Cloud
Founded20142015

Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Cloud & Infrastructure).

What each one covers

Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.

Only in Lambda (AWS Serverless)

  • Function-as-a-Service
  • Event-driven execution
  • Pay-per-use
  • Multiple languages
  • Concurrency limits
  • Dead Letter Queues
  • Environment variables
  • API Gateway

Only in Nomad

  • Container orchestration
  • Job scheduling
  • Multi-cloud support
  • Service discovery
  • Rolling deployments
  • Monitoring integration
  • High availability
  • Docker

Both cover

  • Auto-scaling
  • Encryption
  • Cloud deployment

What people use each for

The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.

Lambda (AWS Serverless)

  • Event-driven functions without managing serversnot Nomad
  • API backends behind API Gatewaynot Nomad
  • Processing S3, DynamoDB, SQS and Kinesis eventsnot Nomad
  • Scheduled jobs without a always-on instancenot Nomad
  • Edge compute through Lambda@Edgenot Nomad

Nomad

  • Scheduling containers, binaries, Java and VM workloads on the same clusternot Lambda (AWS Serverless)
  • Running an orchestrator with a single binary and no external dependenciesnot Lambda (AWS Serverless)
  • Batch and edge workload scheduling across multiple datacentresnot Lambda (AWS Serverless)

Where each one falls short

Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.

Lambda (AWS Serverless)

  • Billed on two axes at once, $0.20 per million requests plus $0.0000166667 per GB-second of duration, so memory settings change the bill as much as traffic does
  • Provisioned concurrency, used to avoid cold starts, is charged separately at $0.0000041667 per GB-second whether or not the function runs
  • Ephemeral storage beyond the included 512 MB is metered
  • Lambda@Edge costs $0.60 per million requests, three times the standard request rate
  • VPC use and cross-region data transfer carry EC2 charges on top

Nomad

  • Nomad 1.7.0 and later is licensed under the Business Source License 1.1 with IBM Corporation as licensor, not an OSI open source licence
  • The Additional Use Grant forbids offering Nomad to third parties on a hosted or embedded basis in a paid product that competes with IBM's paid versions
  • Each version converts to MPL 2.0 only four years after that version is published
  • Resource quotas, Sentinel policies and audit logging sit in a Governance and Policy add-on module that is separate from the Enterprise base platform package
  • Multi-region deployments, multiple Vault namespaces and Nomad Autopilot advanced server management require Nomad Enterprise

Pricing, plan by plan

Lambda (AWS Serverless)

Free
  • Free TierFree
    • 1M free requests/month
    • 400,000 GB-seconds/month
    • Always free

Nomad

Free
  • Open SourceFree
    • Workload orchestration
    • Multi-cloud
    • Flexible scheduling

Which should you pick?

Choose Lambda (AWS Serverless) if

  • You need function-as-a-service.
  • You want to start without paying.
  • You work on Web, Api.
  • You also want event-driven execution.

Choose Nomad if

  • You need container orchestration.
  • You want to start without paying.
  • You work on Linux, Windows, Mac, Cloud.
  • You also want job scheduling.

Questions people ask

Is Lambda (AWS Serverless) or Nomad better?
Neither clearly leads. Lambda (AWS Serverless) starts at Free and Nomad at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
Which is cheaper, Lambda (AWS Serverless) or Nomad?
Lambda (AWS Serverless) starts at Free and Nomad at Free.
Does Lambda (AWS Serverless) or Nomad run on more platforms?
Lambda (AWS Serverless) runs on Web, Api. Nomad runs on Linux, Windows, Mac, Cloud.
Can I use Lambda (AWS Serverless) for free?
Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
What is Lambda (AWS Serverless) best used for?
Lambda (AWS Serverless) is most often used for event-driven functions without managing servers, api backends behind api gateway, processing s3, dynamodb, sqs and kinesis events, scheduled jobs without a always-on instance. Of those, event-driven functions without managing servers and api backends behind api gateway are not what Nomad is typically brought in for.
What can Lambda (AWS Serverless) do that Nomad cannot?
Lambda (AWS Serverless) covers Function-as-a-Service, Event-driven execution, Pay-per-use, Multiple languages. Nomad covers Container orchestration, Job scheduling, Multi-cloud support, Service discovery. Both handle Auto-scaling, Encryption, Cloud deployment.

Related pages