APIs · head to head
Neonomics vs Sila

Neonomics
APIs
Nordic open banking payments and data, now with UK coverage through Ordo
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -

Sila
APIs
US money movement API for ACH, RTP and FedNow with KYC and ledgering built in
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Neonomics coverage outside the Nordics and the UK is comparatively shallow, so a pan European merchant will find gaps and inconsistent bank behaviour in southern and eastern markets.; Sila no pricing is published, so you cannot compare Sila against Moov or Dwolla without entering two sales processes, and small programmes frequently find the monthly minimum dominates their cost at low volume.
- They diverge on capability: Neonomics covers Payment initiation, Sila covers ACH origination.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Neonomics and Sila actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (On request), pricing model (quote), free tier (No), platforms (Web, API), user rating (Not yet rated), category (APIs).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Neonomics
- Payment initiation
- Account information
- Nordic bank depth
- UK coverage via Ordo
- Variable recurring payments
- Request to pay
- White label journeys
- Reconciliation data
Only in Sila
- ACH origination
- Instant rails
- KYC and KYB
- Virtual accounts
- Ledger
- Wallets and holds
- Webhooks
- Bank-side deployment
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Neonomics
- A Norwegian or Swedish merchant collecting payments directly from bank accounts to avoid card feesnot Sila
- A debt collection agency sending request to pay messages instead of chasing bank transfers manuallynot Sila
- A software vendor embedding pay by bank into an accounting or invoicing product for Nordic customersnot Sila
- A business needing both UK and Nordic bank payment coverage from one suppliernot Sila
Sila
- A small fintech that needs ACH, identity verification and a ledger from one vendor because it has no compliance team to assemble threenot Neonomics
- A marketplace paying out to sellers that wants same-day ACH and instant push options without becoming a money transmitter itselfnot Neonomics
- A community bank replacing batch file ACH processing with an API so it can offer real-time payments to business customersnot Neonomics
- A lending platform that must verify business identity, disburse funds and collect repayments on a schedule from a single integrationnot Neonomics
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Neonomics
- Coverage outside the Nordics and the UK is comparatively shallow, so a pan European merchant will find gaps and inconsistent bank behaviour in southern and eastern markets.
- It is a small company relative to Tink and TrueLayer, so supplier viability and the depth of engineering support behind bank API changes are genuine procurement questions.
- Payment initiation only means the merchant handles settlement, reconciliation and refunds, and there is no chargeback framework to fall back on.
- Integrating a recently acquired UK business means two regulatory entities and, for a period, two technology stacks, so cross market feature parity is a promise rather than an existing state.
- Conversion is governed by each bank's own authentication experience, and Nordic BankID flows behave differently from UK app redirects, so a single UX cannot be assumed across the footprint.
Sila
- No pricing is published, so you cannot compare Sila against Moov or Dwolla without entering two sales processes, and small programmes frequently find the monthly minimum dominates their cost at low volume.
- Sila is materially smaller and less well capitalised than the banking-as-a-service names it competes with, which matters because your customer funds and your payment rails depend on the vendor still trading in three years.
- The sponsor bank behind your programme determines what you can offer and how fast you can change it, and bank partnerships in this sector have been reshuffled repeatedly since 2023, so a bank change during your contract is a realistic risk rather than a theoretical one.
- Coverage is United States only, so any product with cross-border ambitions needs a second payments vendor and a second reconciliation process from the outset.
- Onboarding involves compliance diligence on your own programme, and teams routinely underestimate this, with weeks lost between signing and first live transaction while policies, flow of funds diagrams and BSA arrangements are reviewed.
Pricing, plan by plan
Neonomics
On request- Neonomics platform$undefined/year
- Quoted per customer, typically per initiated payment or per API call
- Volume commitments and monthly minimums are common
- Payment initiation only; merchant handles settlement and refunds
Sila
On request- Sila Payments Platform$undefined/month
- ACH, RTP and FedNow
- KYC and KYB verification
- Virtual accounts and ledger
Which should you pick?
Choose Neonomics if
- You need payment initiation.
- You work on Web, API.
- You also want account information.
Questions people ask
- Is Neonomics or Sila better?
- Neither clearly leads. Neonomics starts at On request and Sila at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Neonomics or Sila?
- Neonomics starts at On request and Sila at On request.
- Does Neonomics or Sila run on more platforms?
- Both run on Web, API, so platform support will not decide this one for you.
- What is Neonomics best used for?
- Neonomics is most often used for a norwegian or swedish merchant collecting payments directly from bank accounts to avoid card fees, a debt collection agency sending request to pay messages instead of chasing bank transfers manually, a software vendor embedding pay by bank into an accounting or invoicing product for nordic customers, a business needing both uk and nordic bank payment coverage from one supplier. Of those, a norwegian or swedish merchant collecting payments directly from bank accounts to avoid card fees and a debt collection agency sending request to pay messages instead of chasing bank transfers manually are not what Sila is typically brought in for.
- What can Neonomics do that Sila cannot?
- Neonomics covers Payment initiation, Account information, Nordic bank depth, UK coverage via Ordo. Sila covers ACH origination, Instant rails, KYC and KYB, Virtual accounts.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Neonomics: Is Neonomics authorised in the UK?
Yes, through the acquisition of Ordo, an FCA authorised open banking payments firm, approved by the FCA and the Norwegian regulator.
Sila: Does Sila require a sponsor bank?
Yes. Funds sit at a partner bank, and which bank that is affects your product features and your regulatory exposure, so ask before signing.
Neonomics: Does it support variable recurring payments?
Yes in the UK through the Ordo capability, subject to which banks support commercial VRP; support elsewhere is more limited.
Sila: Is Sila still operating?
Yes. It continues to trade and announced an API integration with GBank in 2025 covering ACH, RTP and FedNow.
Neonomics: Does Neonomics hold merchant funds?
No. It initiates payments; settlement, reconciliation and refunds remain with the merchant or its payment provider.
Sila: What does it cost?
Sila does not publish rates. Expect per-transaction pricing plus a monthly minimum, quoted after a compliance conversation.
Sila: Can I use it outside the United States?
No. Sila covers US rails only.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Neonomics vs Token.io
- Neonomics vs TrueLayer
- Neonomics vs Tink
- Neonomics vs Enable Banking
- Neonomics vs Zimpler
- Neonomics vs Trustly
- Neonomics vs Fintecture
- Neonomics vs Salt Edge
- Neonomics vs Yodlee
- Neonomics vs Brite Payments
- Neonomics vs Tribe Payments
- Neonomics vs Volt
- Neonomics vs Pusher
- Neonomics vs Skyflow
- Neonomics vs Backbase
- Neonomics vs Enfuce
- Neonomics vs Increase
- Neonomics vs Dwolla
- Neonomics vs Astra
- Neonomics vs Moov
- Neonomics vs Column
- Neonomics vs Formance
- Neonomics vs Griffin
- Neonomics vs Lithic
- Neonomics vs Treasury Prime
- Neonomics vs Unit
- Neonomics vs Weavr
- Neonomics vs Solaris
- Neonomics vs Parse Server
- Neonomics vs Paw
- Neonomics vs Paymentology
- Neonomics vs Q2 Digital Banking
- Neonomics vs Stainless
- Sila vs Token.io
- Sila vs TrueLayer
- Sila vs Tink
- Sila vs Enable Banking
- Sila vs Zimpler
- Sila vs Trustly
- Sila vs Fintecture
- Sila vs Salt Edge
- Sila vs Yodlee
- Sila vs Brite Payments
- Sila vs Tribe Payments
- Sila vs Volt
- Sila vs Pusher
- Sila vs Skyflow
- Sila vs Backbase
- Sila vs Enfuce
- Sila vs Increase
- Sila vs Dwolla
- Sila vs Astra
- Sila vs Moov
- Sila vs Column
- Sila vs Formance
- Sila vs Griffin
- Sila vs Lithic
- Sila vs Treasury Prime
- Sila vs Unit
- Sila vs Weavr
- Sila vs Solaris
- Sila vs Parse Server
- Sila vs Paw
- Sila vs Paymentology
- Sila vs Q2 Digital Banking
- Sila vs Stainless
