Crypto · head to head
Nansen vs Snowplow

Snowplow
Business Intelligence
Behavioural data pipeline you run in your own cloud, relicensed away from Apache 2.0 in 2024
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Nansen no pricing published on public pages; pricing details require app login; Snowplow the core pipeline was relicensed from Apache 2.0 on 8 January 2024 to the Snowplow Limited Use Licence Agreement and a Confluent-derived community licence, so organisations that adopted it as permissively licensed software must now review their entitlement, buy a licence, or migrate.
- They diverge on capability: Nansen covers Wallet Labels, Snowplow covers Own-cloud deployment.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Nansen and Snowplow actually diverge.
Identical on both: free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Nansen
- Wallet Labels
- Smart Money Tracking
- Token God Mode
- NFT Paradise
- DeFi Analytics
- Multi-chain
- API
- Web support
Only in Snowplow
- Own-cloud deployment
- Schema enforcement
- Warehouse loading
- Enrichment
- Trackers
- Streaming output
- Data models
- Snowplow BDP
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Nansen
- Analyticsnot Snowplow
- On Chainnot Snowplow
- Researchnot Snowplow
Snowplow
- A data team that needs full-fidelity event data in its own warehouse to build attribution or machine learning features rather than to populate dashboardsnot Nansen
- A regulated business that cannot send behavioural data to a third-party analytics vendor and must keep collection inside its own cloud accountnot Nansen
- A product organisation tired of silently malformed events, which wants a schema contract enforced at collection timenot Nansen
- A company modelling customer behaviour across web, mobile and server events that needs them in one consistent structurenot Nansen
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Nansen
- No pricing published on public pages; pricing details require app login
Snowplow
- The core pipeline was relicensed from Apache 2.0 on 8 January 2024 to the Snowplow Limited Use Licence Agreement and a Confluent-derived community licence, so organisations that adopted it as permissively licensed software must now review their entitlement, buy a licence, or migrate.
- You run the pipeline in your own cloud, which means the infrastructure bill, the on-call rota and the upgrade work are yours, and at high event volume that operational cost frequently exceeds what a hosted product would have charged.
- Schema enforcement is the main benefit and the main friction, because every new event requires a schema to be authored and versioned, and teams without discipline around that end up blocked on their own governance process.
- There is no analysis layer: Snowplow delivers data to your warehouse and nothing else, so you still need modelling, a BI tool and the people to run them before anyone sees a number.
- The licence change fractured the community, spawning an Apache 2.0 fork, which means community contributions and third-party tooling are now split across two codebases with uncertain long-term maintenance.
Pricing, plan by plan
Nansen
$150/month- Pioneer$150/month
- Smart Money
- Token Flows
- NFT analytics
- Standard$750/month
- All Pioneer features
- API access
- Advanced queries
Snowplow
On request- Snowplow BDP$undefined/year
- Commercial pricing quoted by event volume and deployment
- Core pipeline components under the Snowplow Limited Use Licence Agreement, not Apache 2.0
- Trackers, analytics SDKs and Iglu SDKs remain Apache 2.0
Which should you pick?
Choose Snowplow if
- You need own-cloud deployment.
- You work on Linux, Web, Docker.
- You also want schema enforcement.
Questions people ask
- Is Nansen or Snowplow better?
- Neither clearly leads. Nansen starts at $150/month and Snowplow at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Nansen or Snowplow?
- Nansen starts at $150/month and Snowplow at On request.
- Does Nansen or Snowplow run on more platforms?
- Nansen runs on Web. Snowplow runs on Linux, Web, Docker.
- What is Nansen best used for?
- Nansen is most often used for analytics, on chain, research. Of those, analytics and on chain are not what Snowplow is typically brought in for.
- What can Nansen do that Snowplow cannot?
- Nansen covers Wallet Labels, Smart Money Tracking, Token God Mode, NFT Paradise. Snowplow covers Own-cloud deployment, Schema enforcement, Warehouse loading, Enrichment.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Nansen: How much does Nansen cost?
Nansen does not publish pricing on its public website. The site mentions 'Low Fees, Optimized Pricing' and references a tier system that 'unlocks lower fees' through platform activity, but specific costs require logging into the Nansen app to view.
SourceSnowplow: Is Snowplow still open source?
Not in the permissive sense. On 8 January 2024 the core pipeline moved from Apache 2.0 to the Snowplow Limited Use Licence Agreement, with version 1.1 following in December 2024, alongside a community licence based on the Confluent Community Licence. Trackers and analytics SDKs remain Apache 2.0.
Nansen: What pricing model does Nansen use?
Nansen uses a tier-based fee structure where users accumulate Stack Points through trading activity to climb tiers and unlock reduced fees. Exact fee percentages and tier thresholds are not disclosed on the public website.
SourceSnowplow: Can we still run it for free in production?
Free use of the relicensed core components is materially constrained and commercial use generally requires an agreement. Read the current licence text against your intended use rather than relying on older documentation.
Snowplow: Is there an Apache 2.0 alternative?
Yes, a fork called OpenSnowcat was created in response to the relicensing and continues under Apache 2.0.
Snowplow: What does Snowplow BDP cost?
Not published. It is quoted by event volume and deployment, and your own cloud infrastructure costs are separate and additional.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Nansen vs Binance
- Nansen vs Bybit
- Nansen vs Curve Finance
- Nansen vs Gemini
- Nansen vs Glassnode
- Nansen vs BscScan
- Nansen vs Dune Analytics
- Nansen vs Moralis
- Nansen vs Zapper
- Nansen vs CoinMarketCap
- Nansen vs DeBank
- Nansen vs Bitfinex
- Nansen vs Bitget
- Nansen vs Bitstamp
- Nansen vs Etherscan
- Nansen vs Anaplan
- Nansen vs Pigment
- Nansen vs DashThis
- Nansen vs Hebbia
- Nansen vs Logi Analytics
- Nansen vs Luzmo
- Nansen vs Preset
- Nansen vs ProfitWell
- Nansen vs Power BI
- Nansen vs Sisense
- Nansen vs Amazon QuickSight
- Nansen vs MicroStrategy
- Nansen vs Yellowfin
- Nansen vs Zebra BI
- Nansen vs Zenlytic
- Nansen vs ThoughtSpot
- Nansen vs Cube
- Snowplow vs Binance
- Snowplow vs Bybit
- Snowplow vs Curve Finance
- Snowplow vs Gemini
- Snowplow vs Glassnode
- Snowplow vs BscScan
- Snowplow vs Dune Analytics
- Snowplow vs Moralis
- Snowplow vs Zapper
- Snowplow vs CoinMarketCap
- Snowplow vs DeBank
- Snowplow vs Bitfinex
- Snowplow vs Bitget
- Snowplow vs Bitstamp
- Snowplow vs Etherscan
- Snowplow vs Anaplan
- Snowplow vs Pigment
- Snowplow vs DashThis
- Snowplow vs Hebbia
- Snowplow vs Logi Analytics
- Snowplow vs Luzmo
- Snowplow vs Preset
- Snowplow vs ProfitWell
- Snowplow vs Power BI
- Snowplow vs Sisense
- Snowplow vs Amazon QuickSight
- Snowplow vs MicroStrategy
- Snowplow vs Yellowfin
- Snowplow vs Zebra BI
- Snowplow vs Zenlytic
- Snowplow vs ThoughtSpot
- Snowplow vs Cube

