Automation Integration · head to head
Nango vs OpenSearch

Nango
Automation Integration
Open source unified API and OAuth infrastructure for product integrations, licensed under Elastic License 2.0
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

OpenSearch
Databases
Open-source search and analytics suite forked from Elasticsearch
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Nango the licence is Elastic License 2.0, which is source available rather than OSI open source, and it forbids offering Nango to third parties as a managed service, so anyone planning to resell or embed it in a platform for their own customers has a genuine legal problem.; OpenSearch diverged from Elasticsearch since 7.10, so clients, plugins and features no longer map one to one
- They diverge on capability: Nango covers Managed OAuth, OpenSearch covers Full-text search.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Nango and OpenSearch actually diverge.
| Attribute | Nango | OpenSearch |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Per connection per month | Open source, no licence fee; managed services billed separately |
| Platforms | Web, Linux, Docker | Linux, Docker, Kubernetes, Self-hosted |
| Category | Automation Integration | Databases |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Nango
- Managed OAuth
- Pre-built integrations
- Custom syncs and actions
- Incremental sync
- Rate limit and retry handling
- Webhooks
- Self-hosting
- Unified models
Only in OpenSearch
- Full-text search
- OpenSearch Dashboards
- Log analytics
- Vector search
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Nango
- A SaaS product that needs to ship twenty customer-facing integrations without hiring a team to maintain OAuth and token refresh for eachnot OpenSearch
- A team that needs a niche or internal API integrated, which closed unified API vendors will not build for themnot OpenSearch
- A company with data residency or security constraints that must self-host the integration layer rather than send customer tokens to a vendornot OpenSearch
- An engineering team replacing a homegrown integration service whose main cost is silent token expiry and rate limit failures in productionnot OpenSearch
OpenSearch
- Log and observability storage where an Apache-2.0 licence is a requirementnot Nango
- Replacing Elasticsearch after the licence change without changing architecturenot Nango
- Search plus analytics on one cluster rather than two systemsnot Nango
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Nango
- The licence is Elastic License 2.0, which is source available rather than OSI open source, and it forbids offering Nango to third parties as a managed service, so anyone planning to resell or embed it in a platform for their own customers has a genuine legal problem.
- Pricing is per connection where a connection is one authorised end-user account, so cost scales linearly with your customer base and a product where each user links several services multiplies quickly beyond what a headline plan price suggests.
- Pre-built integrations vary in depth, and a connection that exists is not the same as a connection that covers the endpoints and objects your feature needs, so each one must be verified before it is designed into a roadmap.
- Custom syncs are written in TypeScript and run in Nango model, which means integration logic lives in a vendor runtime and migrating away later requires rewriting it rather than lifting it out.
- Self-hosting removes the vendor from the data path but transfers operational responsibility for a component that holds customer OAuth tokens, and few teams appreciate the security burden that comes with running that themselves.
OpenSearch
- Diverged from Elasticsearch since 7.10, so clients, plugins and features no longer map one to one
- Operationally heavy in the way Elasticsearch is: cluster sizing, shard strategy and JVM tuning are ongoing work
- Smaller ecosystem of third-party tooling than Elasticsearch, which most integrations still target first
- Overkill for plain application search, where a dedicated search engine is far simpler
Pricing, plan by plan
Nango
Free- FreeFree
- 10 connections
- Pre-built integrations
- Managed OAuth
- Starter$50/month
- 20 connections included
- 1 USD per additional connection
- Custom syncs and actions
- Growth$500/month
- 100 connections included
- 1 USD per additional connection
- Higher limits
- Enterprise$undefined/month
- Quoted
- Custom connection volumes
- Security review and SLA
OpenSearch
Free- OpenSearchFree
- Full functionality
- Self-hosted
- No usage limits
Which should you pick?
Choose Nango if
- You need managed oauth.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Linux, Docker.
- You also want pre-built integrations.
Choose OpenSearch if
- You need full-text search.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, Docker, Kubernetes, Self-hosted.
- You also want opensearch dashboards.
Questions people ask
- Is Nango or OpenSearch better?
- Neither clearly leads. Nango starts at Free and OpenSearch at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Nango or OpenSearch?
- Nango starts at Free and OpenSearch at Free.
- Does Nango or OpenSearch run on more platforms?
- Nango runs on Web, Linux, Docker. OpenSearch runs on Linux, Docker, Kubernetes, Self-hosted.
- Can I use Nango for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Nango best used for?
- Nango is most often used for a saas product that needs to ship twenty customer-facing integrations without hiring a team to maintain oauth and token refresh for each, a team that needs a niche or internal api integrated, which closed unified api vendors will not build for them, a company with data residency or security constraints that must self-host the integration layer rather than send customer tokens to a vendor, an engineering team replacing a homegrown integration service whose main cost is silent token expiry and rate limit failures in production. Of those, a saas product that needs to ship twenty customer-facing integrations without hiring a team to maintain oauth and token refresh for each and a team that needs a niche or internal api integrated, which closed unified api vendors will not build for them are not what OpenSearch is typically brought in for.
- What can Nango do that OpenSearch cannot?
- Nango covers Managed OAuth, Pre-built integrations, Custom syncs and actions, Incremental sync. OpenSearch covers Full-text search, OpenSearch Dashboards, Log analytics, Vector search.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Nango: Is Nango open source?
It is source available under Elastic License 2.0. You can read, modify and self-host it, but you cannot offer it to third parties as a managed service. That is not the same as an OSI approved open source licence.
OpenSearch: Is OpenSearch free?
Yes, Apache 2.0 licensed under the Linux Foundation. Amazon OpenSearch Service is a paid managed option.
Nango: How is it priced?
Per connection per month, where a connection is one authorised end-user account. Free to 10 connections, 50 dollars a month for Starter with 20, 500 for Growth with 100, and one dollar per additional connection.
OpenSearch: Why does OpenSearch exist?
Elastic moved Elasticsearch off the Apache 2.0 licence in 2021. AWS forked the last Apache-licensed version, and the project now sits under the Linux Foundation.
Nango: Can we integrate an API Nango does not support?
Yes. Custom syncs and actions in TypeScript cover any API including internal ones, which is the main advantage over closed unified API products.
OpenSearch: Is OpenSearch compatible with Elasticsearch?
It was at the 7.10 fork point. Both have developed independently since, so compatibility weakens with every release and should be verified for the features you use.
Nango: Can we self-host it?
Yes, under the Elastic License 2.0 terms, which permit self-hosting for your own use but not resale as a service.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Nango vs Alloy Automation
- Nango vs Merge
- Nango vs n8n
- Nango vs Paragon
- Nango vs Windmill
- Nango vs Meltano
- Nango vs RudderStack
- Nango vs Flowable
- Nango vs Grouparoo
- Nango vs Airbyte
- Nango vs Cyclr
- Nango vs Activiti
- Nango vs Prefect
- Nango vs Workato
- Nango vs Automation Anywhere
- Nango vs Blue Prism
- Nango vs CrewAI
- Nango vs Elasticsearch
- Nango vs Meilisearch
- Nango vs Apache Solr
- Nango vs DuckDB
- Nango vs Typesense
- Nango vs QuestDB
- Nango vs ClickHouse
- Nango vs MariaDB
- Nango vs TimescaleDB
- Nango vs LanceDB
- Nango vs Marqo
- Nango vs Nile
- Nango vs Ninox
- Nango vs Privacera
- Nango vs RavenDB
- Nango vs Apache Flink
- Nango vs Apache Kafka
- Nango vs Apache Druid
- OpenSearch vs Alloy Automation
- OpenSearch vs Merge
- OpenSearch vs n8n
- OpenSearch vs Paragon
- OpenSearch vs Windmill
- OpenSearch vs Meltano
- OpenSearch vs RudderStack
- OpenSearch vs Flowable
- OpenSearch vs Grouparoo
- OpenSearch vs Airbyte
- OpenSearch vs Cyclr
- OpenSearch vs Activiti
- OpenSearch vs Prefect
- OpenSearch vs Workato
- OpenSearch vs Automation Anywhere
- OpenSearch vs Blue Prism
- OpenSearch vs CrewAI
- OpenSearch vs Elasticsearch
- OpenSearch vs Meilisearch
- OpenSearch vs Apache Solr
- OpenSearch vs DuckDB
- OpenSearch vs Typesense
- OpenSearch vs QuestDB
- OpenSearch vs ClickHouse
- OpenSearch vs MariaDB
- OpenSearch vs TimescaleDB
- OpenSearch vs LanceDB
- OpenSearch vs Marqo
- OpenSearch vs Nile
- OpenSearch vs Ninox
- OpenSearch vs Privacera
- OpenSearch vs RavenDB
- OpenSearch vs Apache Flink
- OpenSearch vs Apache Kafka
- OpenSearch vs Apache Druid
