Business Intelligence · head to head
Mode vs Sigma Computing

Sigma Computing
Spreadsheets
Spreadsheet-style analytics that queries a cloud data warehouse directly with no extract layer
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Mode has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Mode free tier limited to 4GB RAM and 1 CPU for SQL notebooks, insufficient for large datasets; Sigma Computing every user interaction is a live warehouse query, so compute costs rise with adoption and land on the warehouse invoice rather than the BI line item, which routinely surprises the team that approved the purchase.
- They diverge on capability: Mode covers SQL Editor, Sigma Computing covers Spreadsheet interface over SQL.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Mode and Sigma Computing actually diverge.
| Attribute | Mode | Sigma Computing |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | Free | On request |
| Pricing model | subscription | quote |
| Free tier | Yes | No |
| Category | Business Intelligence | Spreadsheets |
| Founded | 2013 | Unknown |
Identical on both: platforms (Web), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Mode
- SQL Editor
- Python/R Notebooks
- Interactive Reports
- Version Control
- Scheduling
- Snowflake
- Redshift
- BigQuery
Only in Sigma Computing
- Spreadsheet interface over SQL
- No extract layer
- Input tables and write-back
- Workbooks
- Embedded analytics
- Version control and dbt awareness
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Mode
- Self-service analyticsnot Sigma Computing
- Data explorationnot Sigma Computing
- Ad-hoc reportingnot Sigma Computing
- Collaborative analysisnot Sigma Computing
- Embedded analyticsnot Sigma Computing
Sigma Computing
- A finance or operations team that lives in spreadsheets and needs warehouse-scale data without exporting CSVsnot Mode
- An organisation that has consolidated on Snowflake or Databricks and wants one governed access layer rather than several desktop toolsnot Mode
- Planning and scenario work where users need to type assumptions back into governed tables rather than into a local filenot Mode
- Embedding customer-facing analytics into a product where each tenant must only see their own rowsnot Mode
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Mode
- Free tier limited to 4GB RAM and 1 CPU for SQL notebooks, insufficient for large datasets
- Requires SQL knowledge for most analysis tasks, creating dependency on technical resources
- Paid plan pricing not publicly listed; requires sales consultation
- Recently acquired by ThoughtSpot in 2026, creating product direction uncertainty
- Limited customization options for visual aspects and embedded analytics
Sigma Computing
- Every user interaction is a live warehouse query, so compute costs rise with adoption and land on the warehouse invoice rather than the BI line item, which routinely surprises the team that approved the purchase.
- It cannot work without a supported cloud data warehouse, so an organisation running analytics on an on-premises database or a plain application database has nothing to connect to.
- Pricing is not published and seats are differentiated by capability, so budgeting requires a sales cycle and a headcount forecast before you can compare it with a tool you could simply buy.
- Performance is only as good as the warehouse behind it, which means slow or badly modelled tables surface as a slow interface and the fix is a data engineering project, not a Sigma setting.
- Statistical and scientific visualisation is limited compared with dedicated tools, so anything beyond standard business charting has to be done elsewhere and brought back in.
Pricing, plan by plan
Mode
Free- FreeFree
- SQL Editor
- Python/R Notebooks
- Basic Charts
- Business$65/month
- Advanced Visualizations
- Collaboration
- Integrations
Sigma Computing
On request- Sigma Computing$undefined/year
- Quoted per organisation
- Seat types are differentiated by whether a user views, explores or authors
- Warehouse compute is billed separately by your cloud data warehouse vendor
Which should you pick?
Choose Mode if
- You need sql editor.
- You want to start without paying.
- You also want python/r notebooks.
Choose Sigma Computing if
- You need spreadsheet interface over sql.
- You also want no extract layer.
Questions people ask
- Is Mode or Sigma Computing better?
- Neither clearly leads. Mode starts at Free and Sigma Computing at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Mode or Sigma Computing?
- Mode has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for Mode and On request for Sigma Computing.
- Does Mode or Sigma Computing run on more platforms?
- Both run on Web, so platform support will not decide this one for you.
- Can I use Mode for free?
- Yes. Mode has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Sigma Computing starts at On request.
- What is Mode best used for?
- Mode is most often used for self-service analytics, data exploration, ad-hoc reporting, collaborative analysis. Of those, self-service analytics and data exploration are not what Sigma Computing is typically brought in for.
- What can Mode do that Sigma Computing cannot?
- Mode covers SQL Editor, Python/R Notebooks, Interactive Reports, Version Control. Sigma Computing covers Spreadsheet interface over SQL, No extract layer, Input tables and write-back, Workbooks.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Mode: What languages does Mode support for analysis?
Mode notebooks support SQL, Python (3.11 with pandas, NumPy, scikit-learn, matplotlib), and R (4.2.0 with ggplot2, dplyr, tidyr). Both Python and R allow additional library installation at runtime.
SourceSigma Computing: Does Sigma store a copy of my data?
No. Queries are executed on your warehouse and results are returned for display, which is why there is no extract refresh to manage.
Mode: Can I integrate Mode notebook results into reports?
Yes. Mode allows adding notebook cell results directly to reports, with synchronized scheduling so reports re-run to keep data current.
SourceSigma Computing: What does it actually cost?
The vendor does not publish prices. Expect an annual contract priced by seat type, plus a warehouse compute increase you should model separately.
Mode: Does Mode support collaborative analysis?
Yes. Mode notebooks provide moveable code blocks and markdown cells enabling exploratory analysis and team collaboration on data queries and visualizations.
SourceSigma Computing: Can business users break the warehouse?
They can run expensive queries. Warehouse sizing, query limits and materialised tables are the controls, and they need configuring before a wide rollout.
Sigma Computing: Is it a replacement for a modelling layer like dbt?
No. Sigma works best on top of modelled tables and is usually deployed alongside dbt rather than instead of it.
Related pages
More on Sigma Computing
Other head to heads
- Mode vs Periscope Data
- Mode vs Domo
- Mode vs Fabi
- Mode vs Deepnote
- Mode vs Yellowfin
- Mode vs TIBCO Spotfire
- Mode vs Hex
- Mode vs GoodData
- Mode vs Grow
- Mode vs Qlik Sense
- Mode vs Databox
- Mode vs Cube
- Mode vs Jedox
- Mode vs Logi Analytics
- Mode vs Luzmo
- Mode vs NetBase Quid
- Mode vs Phocas
- Mode vs Preset
- Mode vs Tableau
- Mode vs Metabase
- Mode vs Looker
- Mode vs Equals
- Mode vs Redash
- Mode vs Apache Superset
- Mode vs APITable
- Mode vs Coefficient
- Mode vs Mathesar
- Mode vs SeaTable
- Mode vs Numbers
- Mode vs Zoho Sheet
- Mode vs Cube Software
- Mode vs Quadratic
- Mode vs Rowy
- Mode vs Teable
- Sigma Computing vs Periscope Data
- Sigma Computing vs Domo
- Sigma Computing vs Fabi
- Sigma Computing vs Deepnote
- Sigma Computing vs Yellowfin
- Sigma Computing vs TIBCO Spotfire
- Sigma Computing vs Hex
- Sigma Computing vs GoodData
- Sigma Computing vs Grow
- Sigma Computing vs Qlik Sense
- Sigma Computing vs Databox
- Sigma Computing vs Cube
- Sigma Computing vs Jedox
- Sigma Computing vs Logi Analytics
- Sigma Computing vs Luzmo
- Sigma Computing vs NetBase Quid
- Sigma Computing vs Phocas
- Sigma Computing vs Preset
- Sigma Computing vs Tableau
- Sigma Computing vs Metabase
- Sigma Computing vs Looker
- Sigma Computing vs Equals
- Sigma Computing vs Redash
- Sigma Computing vs Apache Superset
- Sigma Computing vs APITable
- Sigma Computing vs Coefficient
- Sigma Computing vs Mathesar
- Sigma Computing vs SeaTable
- Sigma Computing vs Numbers
- Sigma Computing vs Zoho Sheet
- Sigma Computing vs Cube Software
- Sigma Computing vs Quadratic
- Sigma Computing vs Rowy
- Sigma Computing vs Teable

