File Storage · head to head
MinIO vs Sync.com

MinIO
File Storage
S3-compatible object storage server you run yourself, now under AGPL with a stripped community edition
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

Sync.com
File Storage
Cloud storage, backup and sharing with end-to-end encryption
- From
- $8/month
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only MinIO has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: MinIO the AGPL v3 licence applies copyleft over network use, so embedding MinIO in a product or hosted service obliges you to release your own source or buy a commercial licence, and legal review has removed it from several vendor stacks for this reason alone.; Sync.com all Teams plans require a minimum of 3 users
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which MinIO and Sync.com actually diverge.
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (File Storage).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in MinIO
- S3 API implementation
- Erasure coding
- Single binary deployment
- Bucket replication
- Object locking and versioning
- Identity provider integration
Only in Sync.com
Nothing recorded that MinIO does not also cover.
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
MinIO
- Providing an S3 endpoint inside an air gapped or regulated network where a cloud bucket is not permittednot Sync.com
- Backing a Kubernetes platform with object storage that lives on the same hardware as the clusternot Sync.com
- Standing up S3 semantics in CI so tests exercise the same API path as productionnot Sync.com
- Fronting local disk shelves with an S3 interface so applications only ever learn one storage APInot Sync.com
Sync.com
- Sharing patient records between healthcare providers with HIPAA compliancenot MinIO
- Managing confidential legal documents with encrypted folders and version historynot MinIO
- Providing secure client portals for financial advisors sharing sensitive datanot MinIO
- Maintaining GDPR-compliant file storage for European customer datanot MinIO
- Enabling remote work access to sensitive files without third-party trackingnot MinIO
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
MinIO
- The AGPL v3 licence applies copyleft over network use, so embedding MinIO in a product or hosted service obliges you to release your own source or buy a commercial licence, and legal review has removed it from several vendor stacks for this reason alone.
- The community edition console was reduced in 2025 to an object browser, so user, policy, bucket and configuration management now happen through the mc command line client or through the paid product, which is a real operational regression for teams that trained staff on the UI.
- The vendor has changed the terms of the free edition twice, so planning long lived infrastructure around the community build carries the risk that the next change removes something you depend on.
- Erasure coded deployments cannot be grown by adding single drives; capacity is added in server pools, so expansion is a hardware purchase in units rather than an incremental one.
- Commercial pricing is capacity based and aimed at large deployments, so a team that outgrows the community edition faces an enterprise sized quote rather than a graduated upgrade path.
Sync.com
- All Teams plans require a minimum of 3 users
- The advertised low monthly rate (e.g. $4/month for Teams 1TB) is a promotional annual rate described as 50% off; the standard monthly price is $8/month without the promotion
- Enterprise pricing for 100+ users is custom and requires contacting a dedicated account manager
Pricing, plan by plan
MinIO
Free- Community (AGPL v3)Free
- Full server functionality
- Erasure coding and replication
- Object browser only in the web console
- AIStor$undefined/year
- Commercial licence removing AGPL obligations
- Full management console
- Vendor support with response commitments
Sync.com
$8/month- Teams 1TB$8/month
- 1 TB secure storage
- Advanced sharing
- Administrator account
- Teams 2TB$12/month
- 2 TB secure storage
- Custom branding
- Role-based access control
- Teams 10TB$18/month
- 10 TB secure storage
- VIP support
- 365-day history
- Sync Enterprise$undefined/mo
- Custom storage limits
- Custom branding
- Role-based access control
Which should you pick?
Choose MinIO if
- You need s3 api implementation.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, macOS, Windows, Kubernetes, Docker.
- You also want erasure coding.
Choose Sync.com if
Nothing in the data separates Sync.com from MinIO on the points above - pick on price and on how each one feels to use.
Questions people ask
- Is MinIO or Sync.com better?
- Neither clearly leads. MinIO starts at Free and Sync.com at $8/month, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, MinIO or Sync.com?
- MinIO has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for MinIO and $8/month for Sync.com.
- Does MinIO or Sync.com run on more platforms?
- MinIO runs on Linux, macOS, Windows, Kubernetes, Docker. Sync.com runs on Web.
- Can I use MinIO for free?
- Yes. MinIO has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Sync.com starts at $8/month.
- What is MinIO best used for?
- MinIO is most often used for providing an s3 endpoint inside an air gapped or regulated network where a cloud bucket is not permitted, backing a kubernetes platform with object storage that lives on the same hardware as the cluster, standing up s3 semantics in ci so tests exercise the same api path as production, fronting local disk shelves with an s3 interface so applications only ever learn one storage api. Of those, providing an s3 endpoint inside an air gapped or regulated network where a cloud bucket is not permitted and backing a kubernetes platform with object storage that lives on the same hardware as the cluster are not what Sync.com is typically brought in for.
- What can MinIO do that Sync.com cannot?
- MinIO covers S3 API implementation, Erasure coding, Single binary deployment, Bucket replication.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
MinIO: Can I still use MinIO for free?
Yes, the AGPL v3 server remains available and functional. What changed is the console, which no longer manages users, policies or configuration in the community build.
Sync.com: What are the Sync.com team plan price differences?
Sync.com offers three main team tiers: Teams 1TB at $8/month per user (annual), Teams 2TB at $12/month per user (annual), and Teams 10TB at $18/month per user (annual). All require a minimum of 3 users. Higher tiers include enhanced features like custom branding, admin delegation, and longer file history.
SourceMinIO: Does AGPL affect me if I only use it internally?
Internal use without offering the software over a network to third parties generally does not trigger the source obligation, but if MinIO forms part of a service you offer to others, it does. Take advice rather than a forum answer.
Sync.com: Does Sync.com offer a free trial?
Yes, Sync.com offers a 30-day free trial with no credit card required. All plans also include a full 30-day money-back guarantee.
SourceMinIO: What replaced the community console features?
The mc client and the server admin API. Third party UIs exist but they are not maintained by MinIO.
Sync.com: What file history retention does Sync.com provide?
Sync.com Teams 1TB includes 180-day file history. Teams 2TB and Teams 10TB offer 365-day history. This history duration applies across all shared files and team folders.
SourceMinIO: Is it suitable as a Veeam or restic backup target?
Yes, object locking and versioning work and both tools treat it as standard S3. Immutability depends on configuring the lock policy at bucket creation.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- MinIO vs Cloudian
- MinIO vs Scality RING
- MinIO vs Ceph
- MinIO vs Panzura
- MinIO vs Backblaze
- MinIO vs VAST Data
- MinIO vs Cloudflare R2
- MinIO vs IDrive e2
- MinIO vs Storj
- MinIO vs Tigris
- MinIO vs TrueNAS
- MinIO vs Nextcloud
- MinIO vs Tresorit
- MinIO vs Veritas NetBackup
- MinIO vs Google Drive
- MinIO vs Veeam Backup & Replication
- MinIO vs Carbonite
- MinIO vs Barracuda Backup
- MinIO vs Duplicati
- MinIO vs Microsoft OneDrive
- MinIO vs Arq Backup
- MinIO vs Box
- MinIO vs pCloud
- Sync.com vs Cloudian
- Sync.com vs Scality RING
- Sync.com vs Ceph
- Sync.com vs Panzura
- Sync.com vs Backblaze
- Sync.com vs VAST Data
- Sync.com vs Cloudflare R2
- Sync.com vs IDrive e2
- Sync.com vs Storj
- Sync.com vs Tigris
- Sync.com vs TrueNAS
- Sync.com vs Nextcloud
- Sync.com vs Tresorit
- Sync.com vs Veritas NetBackup
- Sync.com vs Google Drive
- Sync.com vs Veeam Backup & Replication
- Sync.com vs Carbonite
- Sync.com vs Barracuda Backup
- Sync.com vs Duplicati
- Sync.com vs Microsoft OneDrive
- Sync.com vs Arq Backup
- Sync.com vs Box
- Sync.com vs pCloud
