Cybersecurity · head to head
Jamf Pro vs Metasploit

Jamf Pro
Cybersecurity
Apple-only device management for Mac, iPhone, iPad and Apple TV, licensed per device by a public US vendor.
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -

Metasploit
Cybersecurity
The world's most used penetration testing framework
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Metasploit has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Jamf Pro it manages Apple hardware only, so any organisation with Windows or Android devices runs a second management platform and produces two sets of compliance evidence, and the two inventories disagree with each other more often than either vendor's documentation suggests.; Metasploit the free Framework edition is command line only; the web interface is Pro only
- They diverge on capability: Jamf Pro covers Automated Device Enrolment, Metasploit covers Exploit database.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Jamf Pro and Metasploit actually diverge.
| Attribute | Jamf Pro | Metasploit |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | On request | Free |
| Pricing model | quote | freemium |
| Free tier | No | Yes |
| Platforms | Web | Desktop, Cli |
| Founded | Unknown | 2000 |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (Cybersecurity).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Jamf Pro
- Automated Device Enrolment
- Configuration profiles
- Policies and scripts
- Smart groups
- Self Service
- Patch management
- Extension attributes
- Same-day OS support
Only in Metasploit
- Exploit database
- Payload generation
- Post-exploitation
- Evasion modules
- Auxiliary scanners
- Social engineering
- Credential harvesting
- Session management
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Jamf Pro
- An Apple-heavy workforce where devices ship directly to users and must configure themselves on first boot with no IT touchnot Metasploit
- Education deployments managing shared iPads across classes with per-user app assignmentnot Metasploit
- Developer organisations where engineers have administrator rights on their own Macs and management has to be achieved by policy and script rather than lockdownnot Metasploit
- Organisations needing compliance evidence for Apple devices that a general-purpose endpoint manager cannot produce at the required depthnot Metasploit
Metasploit
- Penetration testing and exploit development against known vulnerabilitiesnot Jamf Pro
- Validating whether a reported vulnerability is actually exploitablenot Jamf Pro
- Running phishing and credential attack simulations on the Pro editionnot Jamf Pro
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Jamf Pro
- It manages Apple hardware only, so any organisation with Windows or Android devices runs a second management platform and produces two sets of compliance evidence, and the two inventories disagree with each other more often than either vendor's documentation suggests.
- Licensing is per device per year with different rates for computers and mobile devices, so spare and shared hardware sitting in a cupboard continues to consume licences until somebody actively removes it from inventory, which is nobody's job by default.
- Apple's frameworks set the ceiling: if Apple does not expose a setting through MDM or declarative device management, Jamf cannot manage it either, so requests that are a single Group Policy object on Windows are answered with a scripted workaround or with nothing.
- Zero-touch deployment depends on devices being registered in Apple Business Manager, which generally means buying through Apple or an authorised reseller, so machines bought retail or inherited through an acquisition cannot be supervised without wiping and re-enrolling them.
- Getting value from it requires an Apple platform specialist who can write shell scripts, read configuration profiles and design smart group logic, and a generalist team without that skill uses a fraction of the product while paying the full per-device rate.
Metasploit
- The free Framework edition is command line only; the web interface is Pro only
- Automated exploitation, automated credential attacks and antivirus evading dynamic payloads are restricted to Metasploit Pro
- Reporting, audit wizards, task chains and closed loop vulnerability validation are Pro only
- Rapid7 publishes no price for Metasploit Pro and routes buyers to contact sales
Pricing, plan by plan
Jamf Pro
On requestNo published plan breakdown. See the Jamf Pro review.
Metasploit
Free- Metasploit Framework (OSS)Free
- Open source
- 1500+ exploits
- Command line
- Metasploit ProFree
- Web interface
- Automated testing
- Phishing campaigns
Which should you pick?
Choose Jamf Pro if
- You need automated device enrolment.
- You also want configuration profiles.
Choose Metasploit if
- You need exploit database.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Desktop, Cli.
- You also want payload generation.
Questions people ask
- Is Jamf Pro or Metasploit better?
- Neither clearly leads. Jamf Pro starts at On request and Metasploit at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Jamf Pro or Metasploit?
- Metasploit has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at On request for Jamf Pro and Free for Metasploit.
- Does Jamf Pro or Metasploit run on more platforms?
- Jamf Pro runs on Web. Metasploit runs on Desktop, Cli.
- Can I use Metasploit for free?
- Yes. Metasploit has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Jamf Pro starts at On request.
- What is Jamf Pro best used for?
- Jamf Pro is most often used for an apple-heavy workforce where devices ship directly to users and must configure themselves on first boot with no it touch, education deployments managing shared ipads across classes with per-user app assignment, developer organisations where engineers have administrator rights on their own macs and management has to be achieved by policy and script rather than lockdown, organisations needing compliance evidence for apple devices that a general-purpose endpoint manager cannot produce at the required depth. Of those, an apple-heavy workforce where devices ship directly to users and must configure themselves on first boot with no it touch and education deployments managing shared ipads across classes with per-user app assignment are not what Metasploit is typically brought in for.
- What can Jamf Pro do that Metasploit cannot?
- Jamf Pro covers Automated Device Enrolment, Configuration profiles, Policies and scripts, Smart groups. Metasploit covers Exploit database, Payload generation, Post-exploitation, Evasion modules.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Jamf Pro: Does Jamf Pro include endpoint security?
No. Threat prevention, endpoint telemetry and compliance monitoring are Jamf Protect, a separate product and a separate licence. Jamf Connect for identity and password sync is also separate.
Metasploit: Is Metasploit Framework free to use?
Yes, Metasploit Framework is available as free open-source software with source code accessible via GitHub. Community support is provided through Slack, GitHub, Twitter, and email.
SourceJamf Pro: Can it manage Windows or Android?
No. Jamf manages Apple platforms only. A mixed estate needs a second management platform, and that is a deliberate product decision rather than a gap they intend to close.
Metasploit: What is the difference between Metasploit Framework and Metasploit Pro?
Metasploit Framework is the free open-source version. Metasploit Pro is a commercial offering with customer support from Rapid7, though specific pricing and features are not detailed on the download page.
SourceJamf Pro: Do I need Apple Business Manager?
For zero-touch enrolment and volume app licensing, yes. You can enrol devices manually through a user-initiated flow without it, but you lose supervision, automatic enrolment and the ability to prevent a user removing management.
Metasploit: What support is available for the free Framework version?
Community-based support for Metasploit Framework is available through Slack, GitHub, Twitter, and email ([email protected]). Commercial customers using Metasploit Pro receive customer support from Rapid7.
SourceJamf Pro: Can I host it myself?
Yes, Jamf Pro can be self-hosted, though Jamf Cloud is the default and receives new capabilities first. Self-hosting means you own the upgrade cadence, which matters because Apple's September releases set the timetable.
Jamf Pro: How does it compare to Microsoft Intune?
Intune manages Apple devices adequately and is often already paid for in an existing Microsoft agreement, which is the argument against Jamf. Jamf is deeper, supports new Apple releases faster, and has the local agent for scripting. Organisations with a few hundred Macs and a strong Apple culture generally choose Jamf; those with a handful of Macs in a Windows estate generally do not.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Jamf Pro vs Bitdefender Total Security
- Jamf Pro vs 1Password
- Jamf Pro vs Norton 360
- Jamf Pro vs LastPass
- Jamf Pro vs Milestone XProtect
- Jamf Pro vs WireGuard
- Jamf Pro vs VIVOTEK VAST Security Station
- Jamf Pro vs Fenergo
- Jamf Pro vs Saviynt
- Jamf Pro vs Entrust Identity as a Service
- Jamf Pro vs IBM QRadar
- Jamf Pro vs Authelia
- Jamf Pro vs Authy
- Jamf Pro vs Baffle
- Jamf Pro vs Beyond Identity
- Jamf Pro vs BeyondTrust
- Jamf Pro vs Bitdefender VPN
- Jamf Pro vs Burp Suite
- Jamf Pro vs OWASP ZAP
- Jamf Pro vs Syft
- Jamf Pro vs Wireshark
- Jamf Pro vs HashiCorp Vault
- Jamf Pro vs Bitwarden
- Jamf Pro vs Semgrep
- Jamf Pro vs Passbolt
- Jamf Pro vs RoboForm
- Jamf Pro vs Sardine
- Jamf Pro vs Semperis
- Jamf Pro vs SentinelOne
- Jamf Pro vs Shufti Pro
- Jamf Pro vs SentinelOne Singularity
- Metasploit vs Bitdefender Total Security
- Metasploit vs 1Password
- Metasploit vs Norton 360
- Metasploit vs LastPass
- Metasploit vs Milestone XProtect
- Metasploit vs WireGuard
- Metasploit vs VIVOTEK VAST Security Station
- Metasploit vs Fenergo
- Metasploit vs Saviynt
- Metasploit vs Entrust Identity as a Service
- Metasploit vs IBM QRadar
- Metasploit vs Authelia
- Metasploit vs Authy
- Metasploit vs Baffle
- Metasploit vs Beyond Identity
- Metasploit vs BeyondTrust
- Metasploit vs Bitdefender VPN
- Metasploit vs Burp Suite
- Metasploit vs OWASP ZAP
- Metasploit vs Syft
- Metasploit vs Wireshark
- Metasploit vs HashiCorp Vault
- Metasploit vs Bitwarden
- Metasploit vs Semgrep
- Metasploit vs Passbolt
- Metasploit vs RoboForm
- Metasploit vs Sardine
- Metasploit vs Semperis
- Metasploit vs SentinelOne
- Metasploit vs Shufti Pro
- Metasploit vs SentinelOne Singularity
