Cybersecurity · head to head
Metasploit vs Securiti

Metasploit
Cybersecurity
The world's most used penetration testing framework
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

Securiti
Cybersecurity
Data and AI security posture management with privacy operations on a single data catalogue
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Metasploit has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Metasploit the free Framework edition is command line only; the web interface is Pro only; Securiti value depends entirely on connector coverage and completed scanning, so the first useful data map commonly takes months and stalls whenever a data owner will not grant access to a system.
- They diverge on capability: Metasploit covers Exploit database, Securiti covers Sensitive data discovery.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Metasploit and Securiti actually diverge.
| Attribute | Metasploit | Securiti |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | Free | On request |
| Pricing model | freemium | quote |
| Free tier | Yes | No |
| Platforms | Desktop, Cli | Web |
| Founded | 2000 | Unknown |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (Cybersecurity).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Metasploit
- Exploit database
- Payload generation
- Post-exploitation
- Evasion modules
- Auxiliary scanners
- Social engineering
- Credential harvesting
- Session management
Only in Securiti
- Sensitive data discovery
- Data security posture management
- Data access intelligence
- AI and LLM governance
- PrivacyOps
- Data flow governance
- Breach impact analysis
- People data graph
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Metasploit
- Penetration testing and exploit development against known vulnerabilitiesnot Securiti
- Validating whether a reported vulnerability is actually exploitablenot Securiti
- Running phishing and credential attack simulations on the Pro editionnot Securiti
Securiti
- An enterprise that must answer, within days of a breach, exactly whose regulated data was in the affected store and in which jurisdictionsnot Metasploit
- A privacy team automating deletion requests across dozens of systems where the hard part is knowing where a person appears at allnot Metasploit
- A security team that needs to find sensitive data sitting in over-permissive cloud buckets and warehouse tables before an auditor doesnot Metasploit
- A company putting internal data into retrieval-augmented AI applications and needing to prove that regulated fields are not reaching the modelnot Metasploit
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Metasploit
- The free Framework edition is command line only; the web interface is Pro only
- Automated exploitation, automated credential attacks and antivirus evading dynamic payloads are restricted to Metasploit Pro
- Reporting, audit wizards, task chains and closed loop vulnerability validation are Pro only
- Rapid7 publishes no price for Metasploit Pro and routes buyers to contact sales
Securiti
- Value depends entirely on connector coverage and completed scanning, so the first useful data map commonly takes months and stalls whenever a data owner will not grant access to a system.
- Usage-based pricing tied to data volume means costs rise as the estate grows rather than as the security programme matures, and organisations with large but low-risk data lakes pay for scanning they do not need.
- The breadth across DSPM, privacy and AI governance means each individual module is competing with a specialist, and buyers who only need one of the three often find a focused tool does that job better for less.
- Classification accuracy on unstructured and free-text data requires tuning, and untuned deployments generate false positives that erode trust in the catalogue precisely when teams are being asked to act on it.
- Pricing is unpublished and modular, so scoping is difficult without a sales engagement and the eventual cost depends on module choices that are hard to evaluate before you have seen your own data map.
Pricing, plan by plan
Metasploit
Free- Metasploit Framework (OSS)Free
- Open source
- 1500+ exploits
- Command line
- Metasploit ProFree
- Web interface
- Automated testing
- Phishing campaigns
Securiti
On request- Data and AI Command Centre$undefined/year
- Modular, usage based pricing quoted by data volume and modules selected
- Available through the AWS marketplace as well as direct
- Annual subscription with no fixed end date, cancellable
Which should you pick?
Choose Metasploit if
- You need exploit database.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Desktop, Cli.
- You also want payload generation.
Choose Securiti if
- You need sensitive data discovery.
- You also want data security posture management.
Questions people ask
- Is Metasploit or Securiti better?
- Neither clearly leads. Metasploit starts at Free and Securiti at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Metasploit or Securiti?
- Metasploit has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for Metasploit and On request for Securiti.
- Does Metasploit or Securiti run on more platforms?
- Metasploit runs on Desktop, Cli. Securiti runs on Web.
- Can I use Metasploit for free?
- Yes. Metasploit has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Securiti starts at On request.
- What is Metasploit best used for?
- Metasploit is most often used for penetration testing and exploit development against known vulnerabilities, validating whether a reported vulnerability is actually exploitable, running phishing and credential attack simulations on the pro edition. Of those, penetration testing and exploit development against known vulnerabilities and validating whether a reported vulnerability is actually exploitable are not what Securiti is typically brought in for.
- What can Metasploit do that Securiti cannot?
- Metasploit covers Exploit database, Payload generation, Post-exploitation, Evasion modules. Securiti covers Sensitive data discovery, Data security posture management, Data access intelligence, AI and LLM governance.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Metasploit: Is Metasploit Framework free to use?
Yes, Metasploit Framework is available as free open-source software with source code accessible via GitHub. Community support is provided through Slack, GitHub, Twitter, and email.
SourceSecuriti: Is Securiti a DSPM tool or a privacy tool?
Both, deliberately. It runs data security posture management and privacy operations off one discovery catalogue, which is its main argument against buying two products.
Metasploit: What is the difference between Metasploit Framework and Metasploit Pro?
Metasploit Framework is the free open-source version. Metasploit Pro is a commercial offering with customer support from Rapid7, though specific pricing and features are not detailed on the download page.
SourceSecuriti: What does it cost?
Not published. Pricing is modular and usage based, quoted by data volume and selected modules, and it is also available through the AWS marketplace.
Metasploit: What support is available for the free Framework version?
Community-based support for Metasploit Framework is available through Slack, GitHub, Twitter, and email ([email protected]). Commercial customers using Metasploit Pro receive customer support from Rapid7.
SourceSecuriti: How long until it is useful?
Expect months, not weeks. The limiting factor is configuring connectors and getting access approvals to the systems you most want scanned.
Securiti: Does it govern AI use?
Yes, it includes controls over data flowing into models and retrieval pipelines, which is increasingly the reason enterprises shortlist it.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Metasploit vs 1Password
- Metasploit vs Bitdefender Total Security
- Metasploit vs Norton 360
- Metasploit vs LastPass
- Metasploit vs Burp Suite
- Metasploit vs OWASP ZAP
- Metasploit vs Syft
- Metasploit vs Wireshark
- Metasploit vs HashiCorp Vault
- Metasploit vs Bitwarden
- Metasploit vs Semgrep
- Metasploit vs Passbolt
- Metasploit vs RoboForm
- Metasploit vs Sardine
- Metasploit vs Semperis
- Metasploit vs SentinelOne
- Metasploit vs Shufti Pro
- Metasploit vs SentinelOne Singularity
- Metasploit vs BigID
- Metasploit vs OneTrust
- Metasploit vs Transcend
- Metasploit vs DataGrail
- Metasploit vs Varonis Data Security Platform
- Metasploit vs Netwrix
- Metasploit vs Osano
- Metasploit vs Mullvad VPN
- Metasploit vs Speakeasy
- Metasploit vs Endor Labs
- Metasploit vs Enpass
- Metasploit vs Private Internet Access
- Metasploit vs Microsoft Intune
- Metasploit vs NordVPN
- Metasploit vs Omada Identity
- Metasploit vs Ory
- Metasploit vs ProtonVPN
- Securiti vs 1Password
- Securiti vs Bitdefender Total Security
- Securiti vs Norton 360
- Securiti vs LastPass
- Securiti vs Burp Suite
- Securiti vs OWASP ZAP
- Securiti vs Syft
- Securiti vs Wireshark
- Securiti vs HashiCorp Vault
- Securiti vs Bitwarden
- Securiti vs Semgrep
- Securiti vs Passbolt
- Securiti vs RoboForm
- Securiti vs Sardine
- Securiti vs Semperis
- Securiti vs SentinelOne
- Securiti vs Shufti Pro
- Securiti vs SentinelOne Singularity
- Securiti vs BigID
- Securiti vs OneTrust
- Securiti vs Transcend
- Securiti vs DataGrail
- Securiti vs Varonis Data Security Platform
- Securiti vs Netwrix
- Securiti vs Osano
- Securiti vs Mullvad VPN
- Securiti vs Speakeasy
- Securiti vs Endor Labs
- Securiti vs Enpass
- Securiti vs Private Internet Access
- Securiti vs Microsoft Intune
- Securiti vs NordVPN
- Securiti vs Omada Identity
- Securiti vs Ory
- Securiti vs ProtonVPN
