Cybersecurity · head to head
Metasploit vs Refact

Metasploit
Cybersecurity
The world's most used penetration testing framework
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

Refact
Developer Tools
Autonomous AI coding agent for development tasks
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Metasploit the free Framework edition is command line only; the web interface is Pro only; Refact requires configuration for optimal performance
- They diverge on capability: Metasploit covers Exploit database, Refact covers Autonomous agent workflows.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Metasploit and Refact actually diverge.
| Attribute | Metasploit | Refact |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | freemium | Freemium with paid tiers |
| Platforms | Desktop, Cli | VS Code, Web |
| Category | Cybersecurity | Developer Tools |
| Founded | 2000 | 2023 |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Metasploit
- Exploit database
- Payload generation
- Post-exploitation
- Evasion modules
- Auxiliary scanners
- Social engineering
- Credential harvesting
- Session management
Only in Refact
- Autonomous agent workflows
- IDE chat
- Real-time code completions
- GitHub integration
- Database integration
- Multi-LLM support
- 25+ language support
Both cover
- On-premise deployment
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Metasploit
- Penetration testing and exploit development against known vulnerabilitiesnot Refact
- Validating whether a reported vulnerability is actually exploitablenot Refact
- Running phishing and credential attack simulations on the Pro editionnot Refact
Refact
- Autonomous code generation for development tasksnot Metasploit
- End-to-end bug fixes and refactoringnot Metasploit
- Multi-language software development accelerationnot Metasploit
- Enterprise development with data privacy requirementsnot Metasploit
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Metasploit
- The free Framework edition is command line only; the web interface is Pro only
- Automated exploitation, automated credential attacks and antivirus evading dynamic payloads are restricted to Metasploit Pro
- Reporting, audit wizards, task chains and closed loop vulnerability validation are Pro only
- Rapid7 publishes no price for Metasploit Pro and routes buyers to contact sales
Refact
- Requires configuration for optimal performance
- On-premise deployment adds operational complexity
- Free tier limited by daily agent request quota
- Coin system adds complexity to cost calculation
Pricing, plan by plan
Metasploit
Free- Metasploit Framework (OSS)Free
- Open source
- 1500+ exploits
- Command line
- Metasploit ProFree
- Web interface
- Automated testing
- Phishing campaigns
Refact
Free- FreeFree
- Limited daily agent usage
- Unlimited completions
- 2,000 coins for agent and chat
- Pro$10/month
- 40 daily agent requests
- 64k context window
- 10,000 coins monthly
- Enterprise$undefined/custom
- On-premise deployment
- Custom coin allocation
- Fine-tuning support
Which should you pick?
Choose Metasploit if
- You need exploit database.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Desktop, Cli.
- You also want payload generation.
Choose Refact if
- You need autonomous agent workflows.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on VS Code, Web.
- You also want ide chat.
Questions people ask
- Is Metasploit or Refact better?
- Neither clearly leads. Metasploit starts at Free and Refact at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Metasploit or Refact?
- Metasploit starts at Free and Refact at Free.
- Does Metasploit or Refact run on more platforms?
- Metasploit runs on Desktop, Cli. Refact runs on VS Code, Web.
- Can I use Metasploit for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Metasploit best used for?
- Metasploit is most often used for penetration testing and exploit development against known vulnerabilities, validating whether a reported vulnerability is actually exploitable, running phishing and credential attack simulations on the pro edition. Of those, penetration testing and exploit development against known vulnerabilities and validating whether a reported vulnerability is actually exploitable are not what Refact is typically brought in for.
- What can Metasploit do that Refact cannot?
- Metasploit covers Exploit database, Payload generation, Post-exploitation, Evasion modules. Refact covers Autonomous agent workflows, IDE chat, Real-time code completions, GitHub integration. Both handle On-premise deployment.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Metasploit: Is Metasploit Framework free to use?
Yes, Metasploit Framework is available as free open-source software with source code accessible via GitHub. Community support is provided through Slack, GitHub, Twitter, and email.
SourceRefact: How many programming languages does Refact support?
Refact supports 25+ programming languages including Python, JavaScript, Go, Rust, Java, C++, and many others.
SourceMetasploit: What is the difference between Metasploit Framework and Metasploit Pro?
Metasploit Framework is the free open-source version. Metasploit Pro is a commercial offering with customer support from Rapid7, though specific pricing and features are not detailed on the download page.
SourceRefact: Can I deploy Refact on-premises?
Yes. Refact offers on-premise deployment options for organizations requiring complete data control and privacy.
SourceMetasploit: What support is available for the free Framework version?
Community-based support for Metasploit Framework is available through Slack, GitHub, Twitter, and email ([email protected]). Commercial customers using Metasploit Pro receive customer support from Rapid7.
SourceRefact: What LLMs does Refact support?
Refact works with multiple LLMs including Claude, GPT-4, and open-source models, giving you flexibility in model selection.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- Metasploit vs 1Password
- Metasploit vs Bitdefender Total Security
- Metasploit vs Norton 360
- Metasploit vs LastPass
- Metasploit vs Burp Suite
- Metasploit vs OWASP ZAP
- Metasploit vs Syft
- Metasploit vs Wireshark
- Metasploit vs HashiCorp Vault
- Metasploit vs Bitwarden
- Metasploit vs Semgrep
- Metasploit vs Passbolt
- Metasploit vs RoboForm
- Metasploit vs Sardine
- Metasploit vs Semperis
- Metasploit vs SentinelOne
- Metasploit vs Shufti Pro
- Metasploit vs SentinelOne Singularity
- Metasploit vs GitHub Copilot
- Metasploit vs Swagger UI
- Metasploit vs Sweep
- Metasploit vs Coder
- Metasploit vs Pieces for Developers
- Metasploit vs CodeSandbox
- Metasploit vs GNU Emacs
- Metasploit vs Moonrepo
- Metasploit vs Pants Build
- Metasploit vs Atlantis
- Metasploit vs Backstage
- Metasploit vs Visual Studio Code
- Metasploit vs Garden
- Metasploit vs GitLab CI/CD
- Metasploit vs HCP Terraform
- Metasploit vs Helm
- Metasploit vs Jitsu
- Metasploit vs Notepad++
- Refact vs 1Password
- Refact vs Bitdefender Total Security
- Refact vs Norton 360
- Refact vs LastPass
- Refact vs Burp Suite
- Refact vs OWASP ZAP
- Refact vs Syft
- Refact vs Wireshark
- Refact vs HashiCorp Vault
- Refact vs Bitwarden
- Refact vs Semgrep
- Refact vs Passbolt
- Refact vs RoboForm
- Refact vs Sardine
- Refact vs Semperis
- Refact vs SentinelOne
- Refact vs Shufti Pro
- Refact vs SentinelOne Singularity
- Refact vs GitHub Copilot
- Refact vs Swagger UI
- Refact vs Sweep
- Refact vs Coder
- Refact vs Pieces for Developers
- Refact vs CodeSandbox
- Refact vs GNU Emacs
- Refact vs Moonrepo
- Refact vs Pants Build
- Refact vs Atlantis
- Refact vs Backstage
- Refact vs Visual Studio Code
- Refact vs Garden
- Refact vs GitLab CI/CD
- Refact vs HCP Terraform
- Refact vs Helm
- Refact vs Jitsu
- Refact vs Notepad++
