Cybersecurity · head to head
Metasploit vs pfSense
Metasploit
Cybersecurity
The world's most used penetration testing framework
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
pfSense
Networking
Open source firewall software with a free Community Edition and a separate commercial Plus edition sold by Netgate
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Metasploit the free Framework edition is command line only; the web interface is Pro only; pfSense pfSense CE and pfSense Plus are not simply the same software with a support contract layered on top; Plus is a separately developed edition with its own feature set, and moving between them is a migration, not a toggle
- They diverge on capability: Metasploit covers Exploit database, pfSense covers Stateful firewall and NAT.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Metasploit and pfSense actually diverge.
| Attribute | Metasploit | pfSense |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | freemium | Open source Community Edition, free; commercial Plus edition sold separately by Netgate |
| Platforms | Desktop, Cli | Linux |
| Category | Cybersecurity | Networking |
| Founded | 2000 | Unknown |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Metasploit
- Exploit database
- Payload generation
- Post-exploitation
- Evasion modules
- Auxiliary scanners
- Social engineering
- Credential harvesting
- Session management
Only in pfSense
- Stateful firewall and NAT
- VPN support
- Traffic shaping and QoS
- Package ecosystem
- CE and Plus editions
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Metasploit
- Penetration testing and exploit development against known vulnerabilitiesnot pfSense
- Validating whether a reported vulnerability is actually exploitablenot pfSense
- Running phishing and credential attack simulations on the Pro editionnot pfSense
pfSense
- A home user or small business wanting a free, fully-featured firewall on commodity hardware with no licence costnot Metasploit
- A business wanting an integrated firewall appliance with vendor support, typically buying a Netgate appliance bundled with pfSense Plusnot Metasploit
- A team wanting to evaluate advanced features like real-time threat intelligence before committing to Netgate hardware or a Plus migrationnot Metasploit
- An organisation replacing an expensive commercial firewall with an open source alternative while retaining the option to add commercial support laternot Metasploit
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Metasploit
- The free Framework edition is command line only; the web interface is Pro only
- Automated exploitation, automated credential attacks and antivirus evading dynamic payloads are restricted to Metasploit Pro
- Reporting, audit wizards, task chains and closed loop vulnerability validation are Pro only
- Rapid7 publishes no price for Metasploit Pro and routes buyers to contact sales
pfSense
- pfSense CE and pfSense Plus are not simply the same software with a support contract layered on top; Plus is a separately developed edition with its own feature set, and moving between them is a migration, not a toggle
- Running Plus on non-Netgate hardware depends on Netgate's current migration terms, which have changed over time, so a buyer planning to use white-box hardware with Plus should verify current eligibility rather than assume it works as it did previously
- CE has no official vendor support channel; a business relying on it for production firewalling without a support contract is self-supporting on community forums
- Some newer features and threat intelligence integrations are Plus-only, so CE users do not get feature parity going forward even though both editions remain under active development
- Netgate's own appliance pricing and the terms of the CE-to-Plus migration path are not always clearly presented in one place, requiring some digging to understand the real total cost of a Plus deployment on non-Netgate hardware
- As with any self-managed firewall, security depends on the operator applying updates and correctly configuring rules; there is no managed security operations layer included even in Plus
Pricing, plan by plan
Metasploit
Free- Metasploit Framework (OSS)Free
- Open source
- 1500+ exploits
- Command line
- Metasploit ProFree
- Web interface
- Automated testing
- Phishing campaigns
pfSense
Free- pfSense CEFree
- Full firewall and routing functionality
- No vendor lock-in to hardware
- Community support
- pfSense Plus (via Netgate appliance)$undefined/one-time
- Bundled with Netgate hardware appliances from around $189
- Threat intelligence feeds
- Certified support tiers
Which should you pick?
Choose Metasploit if
- You need exploit database.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Desktop, Cli.
- You also want payload generation.
Choose pfSense if
- You need stateful firewall and nat.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux.
- You also want vpn support.
Questions people ask
- Is Metasploit or pfSense better?
- Neither clearly leads. Metasploit starts at Free and pfSense at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Metasploit or pfSense?
- Metasploit starts at Free and pfSense at Free.
- Does Metasploit or pfSense run on more platforms?
- Metasploit runs on Desktop, Cli. pfSense runs on Linux.
- Can I use Metasploit for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Metasploit best used for?
- Metasploit is most often used for penetration testing and exploit development against known vulnerabilities, validating whether a reported vulnerability is actually exploitable, running phishing and credential attack simulations on the pro edition. Of those, penetration testing and exploit development against known vulnerabilities and validating whether a reported vulnerability is actually exploitable are not what pfSense is typically brought in for.
- What can Metasploit do that pfSense cannot?
- Metasploit covers Exploit database, Payload generation, Post-exploitation, Evasion modules. pfSense covers Stateful firewall and NAT, VPN support, Traffic shaping and QoS, Package ecosystem.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Metasploit: Is Metasploit Framework free to use?
Yes, Metasploit Framework is available as free open-source software with source code accessible via GitHub. Community support is provided through Slack, GitHub, Twitter, and email.
SourcepfSense: What is the difference between pfSense CE and pfSense Plus?
CE is the free, open source edition installable on any compatible hardware; Plus is a commercial edition from Netgate with additional features and support, typically bundled with Netgate appliances.
Metasploit: What is the difference between Metasploit Framework and Metasploit Pro?
Metasploit Framework is the free open-source version. Metasploit Pro is a commercial offering with customer support from Rapid7, though specific pricing and features are not detailed on the download page.
SourcepfSense: Can I run pfSense Plus on my own hardware?
It is possible through a migration from a CE installation via Netgate's official channel, but the terms and availability of that path have changed over time and should be confirmed directly with Netgate.
Metasploit: What support is available for the free Framework version?
Community-based support for Metasploit Framework is available through Slack, GitHub, Twitter, and email ([email protected]). Commercial customers using Metasploit Pro receive customer support from Rapid7.
SourcepfSense: Is pfSense CE really free with no catch?
Yes, CE has no licence fee and no hardware lock-in, though it comes with community rather than vendor support.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Metasploit vs 1Password
- Metasploit vs Bitdefender Total Security
- Metasploit vs Norton 360
- Metasploit vs LastPass
- Metasploit vs Burp Suite
- Metasploit vs OWASP ZAP
- Metasploit vs Syft
- Metasploit vs Wireshark
- Metasploit vs HashiCorp Vault
- Metasploit vs Bitwarden
- Metasploit vs Semgrep
- Metasploit vs Passbolt
- Metasploit vs RoboForm
- Metasploit vs Sardine
- Metasploit vs Semperis
- Metasploit vs SentinelOne
- Metasploit vs Shufti Pro
- Metasploit vs SentinelOne Singularity
- Metasploit vs MikroTik RouterOS
- Metasploit vs OpenVPN
- Metasploit vs Cisco Meraki
- Metasploit vs Juniper Mist
- Metasploit vs LibreNMS
- Metasploit vs Icinga
- Metasploit vs OPNsense
- Metasploit vs Zabbix
- Metasploit vs Traefik
- Metasploit vs Eclipse Mosquitto
- Metasploit vs Nebula
- Metasploit vs Consul
- Metasploit vs Domotz
- Metasploit vs Headscale
- Metasploit vs HiveMQ
- Metasploit vs Netdata
- Metasploit vs ThousandEyes
- pfSense vs 1Password
- pfSense vs Bitdefender Total Security
- pfSense vs Norton 360
- pfSense vs LastPass
- pfSense vs Burp Suite
- pfSense vs OWASP ZAP
- pfSense vs Syft
- pfSense vs Wireshark
- pfSense vs HashiCorp Vault
- pfSense vs Bitwarden
- pfSense vs Semgrep
- pfSense vs Passbolt
- pfSense vs RoboForm
- pfSense vs Sardine
- pfSense vs Semperis
- pfSense vs SentinelOne
- pfSense vs Shufti Pro
- pfSense vs SentinelOne Singularity
- pfSense vs MikroTik RouterOS
- pfSense vs OpenVPN
- pfSense vs Cisco Meraki
- pfSense vs Juniper Mist
- pfSense vs LibreNMS
- pfSense vs Icinga
- pfSense vs OPNsense
- pfSense vs Zabbix
- pfSense vs Traefik
- pfSense vs Eclipse Mosquitto
- pfSense vs Nebula
- pfSense vs Consul
- pfSense vs Domotz
- pfSense vs Headscale
- pfSense vs HiveMQ
- pfSense vs Netdata
- pfSense vs ThousandEyes