Browser Extensions · head to head
Mercury Reader vs Wappalyzer
Mercury Reader
Browser Extensions
Clear clutter from articles instantly
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Mercury Reader mercury Reader's underlying engine (Postlight Parser) is free open source software licensed under Apache License 2.0, per the GitHub repository, with no paid tier; Wappalyzer cannot detect server-side or hidden technologies without client-side footprints
- They diverge on capability: Mercury Reader covers Content extraction, Wappalyzer covers Technology detection.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Mercury Reader and Wappalyzer actually diverge.
| Attribute | Mercury Reader | Wappalyzer |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | free | Unknown |
| Platforms | Chrome, Firefox, Edge | Chrome, Firefox, Edge, Web |
| Founded | 2015 | 2009 |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Browser Extensions).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Mercury Reader
- Content extraction
- Clean reading view
- Custom themes
- Font customization
Only in Wappalyzer
- Technology detection
- CMS identification
- Framework analysis
- Analytics tracking
Both cover
- Chrome support
- Firefox support
- Edge support
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Mercury Reader
- Mercury Reader's underlying engine (Postlight Parser) is free open source software licensed under Apache License 2.0, per the GitHub repository, with no paid tier
Wappalyzer
- Cannot detect server-side or hidden technologies without client-side footprints
- Went closed-source in 2023; self-hosting now difficult without maintaining community forks
- Data export features locked to Business plan ($450/month) minimum
Pricing, plan by plan
Mercury Reader
Free- FreeFree
- Clutter removal
- Clean reading
- Custom themes
Wappalyzer
FreeNo published plan breakdown. See the Wappalyzer review.
Which should you pick?
Choose Mercury Reader if
- You need content extraction.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Chrome, Firefox, Edge.
- You also want clean reading view.
Choose Wappalyzer if
- You need technology detection.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Chrome, Firefox, Edge, Web.
- You also want cms identification.
Questions people ask
- Is Mercury Reader or Wappalyzer better?
- Neither clearly leads. Mercury Reader starts at Free and Wappalyzer at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Mercury Reader or Wappalyzer?
- Mercury Reader starts at Free and Wappalyzer at Free.
- Does Mercury Reader or Wappalyzer run on more platforms?
- Mercury Reader runs on Chrome, Firefox, Edge. Wappalyzer runs on Chrome, Firefox, Edge, Web.
- Can I use Mercury Reader for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What can Mercury Reader do that Wappalyzer cannot?
- Mercury Reader covers Content extraction, Clean reading view, Custom themes, Font customization. Wappalyzer covers Technology detection, CMS identification, Framework analysis, Analytics tracking. Both handle Chrome support, Firefox support, Edge support.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Wappalyzer: Does Wappalyzer have a free version?
Yes. Wappalyzer's browser extension is completely free and provides unlimited technology lookups with no account required. The free tier includes basic website technology detection across all categories.
SourceWappalyzer: What are the paid pricing tiers for Wappalyzer?
Wappalyzer's paid plans start at $250/month for Pro (5,000 lookups, 1 user), $450/month for Business (20,000 lookups, 5 users, API access), and $850+/month for Enterprise (200,000+ lookups, 25+ users). Annual billing offers 17% discount.
SourceWappalyzer: Can Wappalyzer detect all website technologies?
Wappalyzer detects over 1,000 technologies but cannot detect server-side or hidden technologies, backend infrastructure, internal databases, or ERP systems with no client-side footprint.
SourceWappalyzer: Can Wappalyzer be self-hosted?
Wappalyzer went closed-source in 2023 when the GitHub repository was taken down. It can be deployed via Docker or npm, but the community-contributed fingerprint database is now part of the commercial product. Open-source forks are available but not officially maintained.
SourceWappalyzer: What integrations does Wappalyzer offer?
Wappalyzer integrates with CRM systems like Salesforce and HubSpot, and supports lead list exports and API access for business users on paid plans.
SourceWappalyzer: When does Wappalyzer data export become available?
Data export and lead list generation features are only available on the Business plan ($450/month) and above, not on the Pro tier.
SourceRelated pages
More on Mercury Reader
Other head to heads
- Mercury Reader vs Pocket
- Mercury Reader vs Dark Reader
- Mercury Reader vs Raindrop.io
- Mercury Reader vs Privacy Badger
- Mercury Reader vs AdBlock Plus
- Mercury Reader vs Evernote Web Clipper
- Mercury Reader vs Instapaper
- Mercury Reader vs Awesome Screenshot
- Mercury Reader vs BuiltWith
- Mercury Reader vs Capital One Shopping
- Mercury Reader vs Ghostery
- Mercury Reader vs Honey
- Mercury Reader vs LanguageTool
- Mercury Reader vs ProWritingAid
- Mercury Reader vs Rakuten
- Mercury Reader vs SimilarWeb
- Mercury Reader vs uBlock Origin
- Mercury Reader vs Hemingway Editor
- Wappalyzer vs Pocket
- Wappalyzer vs Dark Reader
- Wappalyzer vs Raindrop.io
- Wappalyzer vs Privacy Badger
- Wappalyzer vs AdBlock Plus
- Wappalyzer vs Evernote Web Clipper
- Wappalyzer vs Instapaper
- Wappalyzer vs Awesome Screenshot
- Wappalyzer vs BuiltWith
- Wappalyzer vs Capital One Shopping
- Wappalyzer vs Ghostery
- Wappalyzer vs Honey
- Wappalyzer vs LanguageTool
- Wappalyzer vs ProWritingAid
- Wappalyzer vs Rakuten
- Wappalyzer vs SimilarWeb
- Wappalyzer vs uBlock Origin
- Wappalyzer vs Hemingway Editor

