Browser Extensions · head to head
Violentmonkey vs Wappalyzer
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Violentmonkey smaller script ecosystem compared to Tampermonkey which has larger user base and more available scripts; Wappalyzer cannot detect server-side or hidden technologies without client-side footprints
- They diverge on capability: Violentmonkey covers Userscript support, Wappalyzer covers Technology detection.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Violentmonkey and Wappalyzer actually diverge.
| Attribute | Violentmonkey | Wappalyzer |
|---|---|---|
| Platforms | Chrome, Firefox, Edge | Chrome, Firefox, Edge, Web |
| Founded | 2013 | 2009 |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), pricing model (Unknown), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Browser Extensions).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Violentmonkey
- Userscript support
- Clean interface
- Cloud sync
- Script editor
- Opera support
Only in Wappalyzer
- Technology detection
- CMS identification
- Framework analysis
- Analytics tracking
Both cover
- Chrome support
- Firefox support
- Edge support
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Violentmonkey
- Run open-source userscripts to customize or automate web pagesnot Wappalyzer
- Import scripts compatible with Greasemonkey and Tampermonkey formatsnot Wappalyzer
- Sync scripts and settings across browsers via Dropbox, OneDrive, Google Drive, or WebDAVnot Wappalyzer
- Batch import/export scripts as zip filesnot Wappalyzer
Wappalyzer
- Building target prospect lists filtered by specific technology adoptionnot Violentmonkey
- Detecting when competitors migrate to new development stacksnot Violentmonkey
- Enriching CRM records with discovered technology stack informationnot Violentmonkey
- Identifying timing signals from prospect infrastructure changesnot Violentmonkey
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Violentmonkey
- Smaller script ecosystem compared to Tampermonkey which has larger user base and more available scripts
- Less marketing and visibility results in lower adoption compared to more widely-known alternatives
- Community maintenance model means slower feature development compared to commercial alternatives
Wappalyzer
- Cannot detect server-side or hidden technologies without client-side footprints
- Went closed-source in 2023; self-hosting now difficult without maintaining community forks
- Data export features locked to Business plan ($450/month) minimum
Pricing, plan by plan
Violentmonkey
FreeNo published plan breakdown. See the Violentmonkey review.
Wappalyzer
FreeNo published plan breakdown. See the Wappalyzer review.
Which should you pick?
Choose Violentmonkey if
- You need userscript support.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Chrome, Firefox, Edge.
- You also want clean interface.
Choose Wappalyzer if
- You need technology detection.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Chrome, Firefox, Edge, Web.
- You also want cms identification.
Questions people ask
- Is Violentmonkey or Wappalyzer better?
- Neither clearly leads. Violentmonkey starts at Free and Wappalyzer at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Violentmonkey or Wappalyzer?
- Violentmonkey starts at Free and Wappalyzer at Free.
- Does Violentmonkey or Wappalyzer run on more platforms?
- Violentmonkey runs on Chrome, Firefox, Edge. Wappalyzer runs on Chrome, Firefox, Edge, Web.
- Can I use Violentmonkey for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Violentmonkey best used for?
- Violentmonkey is most often used for run open-source userscripts to customize or automate web pages, import scripts compatible with greasemonkey and tampermonkey formats, sync scripts and settings across browsers via dropbox, onedrive, google drive, or webdav, batch import/export scripts as zip files. Of those, run open-source userscripts to customize or automate web pages and import scripts compatible with greasemonkey and tampermonkey formats are not what Wappalyzer is typically brought in for.
- What can Violentmonkey do that Wappalyzer cannot?
- Violentmonkey covers Userscript support, Clean interface, Cloud sync, Script editor. Wappalyzer covers Technology detection, CMS identification, Framework analysis, Analytics tracking. Both handle Chrome support, Firefox support, Edge support.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Violentmonkey: Is Violentmonkey open-source?
Yes. Violentmonkey is fully open-source and available on GitHub, making it free to use and community-maintained unlike Tampermonkey which has a larger proprietary ecosystem.
SourceWappalyzer: Does Wappalyzer have a free version?
Yes. Wappalyzer's browser extension is completely free and provides unlimited technology lookups with no account required. The free tier includes basic website technology detection across all categories.
SourceViolentmonkey: What browsers does Violentmonkey support?
Violentmonkey works on browsers with WebExtensions support, including Chrome, Firefox, Edge, and other Chromium-based browsers.
SourceWappalyzer: What are the paid pricing tiers for Wappalyzer?
Wappalyzer's paid plans start at $250/month for Pro (5,000 lookups, 1 user), $450/month for Business (20,000 lookups, 5 users, API access), and $850+/month for Enterprise (200,000+ lookups, 25+ users). Annual billing offers 17% discount.
SourceViolentmonkey: How does Violentmonkey compare to Tampermonkey in performance?
Community benchmarks show Violentmonkey uses about 15 to 30 percent less RAM on Chrome compared to Tampermonkey when managing many open tabs.
SourceWappalyzer: Can Wappalyzer detect all website technologies?
Wappalyzer detects over 1,000 technologies but cannot detect server-side or hidden technologies, backend infrastructure, internal databases, or ERP systems with no client-side footprint.
SourceViolentmonkey: What is the current version of Violentmonkey?
Violentmonkey reached version 2.46.0 as of July 31, 2026, with active ongoing development and regular updates to the open-source project.
SourceWappalyzer: Can Wappalyzer be self-hosted?
Wappalyzer went closed-source in 2023 when the GitHub repository was taken down. It can be deployed via Docker or npm, but the community-contributed fingerprint database is now part of the commercial product. Open-source forks are available but not officially maintained.
SourceWappalyzer: What integrations does Wappalyzer offer?
Wappalyzer integrates with CRM systems like Salesforce and HubSpot, and supports lead list exports and API access for business users on paid plans.
SourceWappalyzer: When does Wappalyzer data export become available?
Data export and lead list generation features are only available on the Business plan ($450/month) and above, not on the Pro tier.
SourceRelated pages
More on Violentmonkey
Other head to heads
- Violentmonkey vs Dark Reader
- Violentmonkey vs Privacy Badger
- Violentmonkey vs Awesome Screenshot
- Violentmonkey vs Tampermonkey
- Violentmonkey vs LanguageTool
- Violentmonkey vs uBlock Origin
- Violentmonkey vs Pocket
- Violentmonkey vs Raindrop.io
- Violentmonkey vs Instapaper
- Violentmonkey vs Honey
- Violentmonkey vs Keeper
- Violentmonkey vs Mercury Reader
- Violentmonkey vs Rakuten
- Violentmonkey vs Hemingway Editor
- Violentmonkey vs Night Eye
- Violentmonkey vs React Developer Tools
- Violentmonkey vs Save to Google Drive
- Violentmonkey vs BuiltWith
- Violentmonkey vs JSON Viewer
- Violentmonkey vs Vue.js Devtools
- Violentmonkey vs Web Developer
- Violentmonkey vs Redux DevTools
- Violentmonkey vs SimilarWeb
- Violentmonkey vs Ghostery
- Violentmonkey vs HTTPS Everywhere
- Violentmonkey vs Vimeo Record
- Violentmonkey vs Arc
- Violentmonkey vs ColorZilla
- Wappalyzer vs Dark Reader
- Wappalyzer vs Privacy Badger
- Wappalyzer vs Awesome Screenshot
- Wappalyzer vs Tampermonkey
- Wappalyzer vs LanguageTool
- Wappalyzer vs uBlock Origin
- Wappalyzer vs Pocket
- Wappalyzer vs Raindrop.io
- Wappalyzer vs Instapaper
- Wappalyzer vs Honey
- Wappalyzer vs Keeper
- Wappalyzer vs Mercury Reader
- Wappalyzer vs Rakuten
- Wappalyzer vs Hemingway Editor
- Wappalyzer vs Night Eye
- Wappalyzer vs React Developer Tools
- Wappalyzer vs Save to Google Drive
- Wappalyzer vs BuiltWith
- Wappalyzer vs JSON Viewer
- Wappalyzer vs Vue.js Devtools
- Wappalyzer vs Web Developer
- Wappalyzer vs Redux DevTools
- Wappalyzer vs SimilarWeb
- Wappalyzer vs Ghostery
- Wappalyzer vs HTTPS Everywhere
- Wappalyzer vs Vimeo Record
- Wappalyzer vs Arc
- Wappalyzer vs ColorZilla


