Spreadsheets · head to head
Looker vs SeaTable

Looker
Spreadsheets
Modern business intelligence platform by Google
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -

SeaTable
Spreadsheets
German-hosted database-spreadsheet hybrid from the team behind Seafile, with a self-hosted server edition
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only SeaTable has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Looker no pricing published on website; quote-based model requires contacting Google Cloud sales; SeaTable the free self-hosted Developer Edition is capped at three users, so the pattern that makes Baserow and NocoDB attractive, running it yourself for free at real headcount, is not available and any serious on-premises deployment needs a paid per-user licence.
- They diverge on capability: Looker covers LookML Data Modeling, SeaTable covers Typed column database.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Looker and SeaTable actually diverge.
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (Spreadsheets).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Looker
- LookML Data Modeling
- Embedded Analytics
- API Access
- Version Control
- Data Actions
- BigQuery
- Snowflake
- Redshift
Only in SeaTable
- Typed column database
- Multiple views
- Universal app builder
- Python and JavaScript scripting
- Self-hosted server
- German data centres
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Looker
- Business intelligence and interactive dashboards for data-driven decision makingnot SeaTable
- Embedded analytics for integrating BI capabilities into third-party applicationsnot SeaTable
SeaTable
- A German or Austrian company that needs a shared operational database but cannot put customer records on a US-hosted servicenot Looker
- Replacing a sprawl of Excel files used by several departments with one permissioned base and per-view sharingnot Looker
- Running a small internal tool, such as an equipment register or an application tracker, without commissioning a bespoke buildnot Looker
- Teams already using Seafile that want structured data alongside their file sync platformnot Looker
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Looker
- No pricing published on website; quote-based model requires contacting Google Cloud sales
- Pricing typically based on user count, deployment type, and feature requirements with no transparency
SeaTable
- The free self-hosted Developer Edition is capped at three users, so the pattern that makes Baserow and NocoDB attractive, running it yourself for free at real headcount, is not available and any serious on-premises deployment needs a paid per-user licence.
- Row limits are counted across the whole account rather than per base, so the free plan ceiling of 10,000 rows and the Plus ceiling of 50,000 rows arrive sooner than people expect once a few tables hold historical records.
- The integration catalogue is short compared with Airtable, and many connections have to be routed through Zapier, Make or n8n, which adds a second subscription and a second failure point.
- English documentation and community content lag the German material, so non-German teams hit thinner tutorials and fewer worked examples when they get to scripting and the app builder.
- The vendor is a small German company rather than a venture-funded platform, which is a stability advantage but means a slower feature pace and fewer third-party consultants available to hire if a project needs outside help.
Pricing, plan by plan
Looker
On requestNo published plan breakdown. See the Looker review.
SeaTable
Free- FreeFree
- Up to 25 users
- 10,000 rows in total
- 2 GB storage
- Plus$7/month
- Billed annually, 9 EUR if billed monthly
- 50,000 rows
- 50 GB storage
- Enterprise$14/month
- Billed annually, 18 EUR if billed monthly
- Unlimited rows
- 100 GB storage
- Dedicated Cloud$undefined/year
- Quoted, minimum 100 users
- Dedicated instance
- Unlimited rows
Which should you pick?
Choose Looker if
- You need lookml data modeling.
- You work on Web, Cloud (Google Cloud Platform).
- You also want embedded analytics.
Choose SeaTable if
- You need typed column database.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android, Linux.
- You also want multiple views.
Questions people ask
- Is Looker or SeaTable better?
- Neither clearly leads. Looker starts at On request and SeaTable at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Looker or SeaTable?
- SeaTable has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at On request for Looker and Free for SeaTable.
- Does Looker or SeaTable run on more platforms?
- Looker runs on Web, Cloud (Google Cloud Platform). SeaTable runs on Web, iOS, Android, Linux.
- Can I use SeaTable for free?
- Yes. SeaTable has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Looker starts at On request.
- What is Looker best used for?
- Looker is most often used for business intelligence and interactive dashboards for data-driven decision making, embedded analytics for integrating bi capabilities into third-party applications. Of those, business intelligence and interactive dashboards for data-driven decision making and embedded analytics for integrating bi capabilities into third-party applications are not what SeaTable is typically brought in for.
- What can Looker do that SeaTable cannot?
- Looker covers LookML Data Modeling, Embedded Analytics, API Access, Version Control. SeaTable covers Typed column database, Multiple views, Universal app builder, Python and JavaScript scripting.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Looker: How much does Looker cost?
Looker does not publish pricing on its website. The platform uses a custom quote model where organizations contact Google Cloud sales for personalized pricing. Pricing is typically based on factors including user count, deployment type (cloud-hosted versus self-hosted), and required feature set.
SourceSeaTable: Where is SeaTable cloud data actually stored?
In data centres in Germany, under German and EU law, with a standard GDPR processing agreement available.
Looker: What are Looker's pricing tiers?
Looker offers subscription-based tiers typically including Standard with core BI capabilities, Advanced with enhanced features and integrations, and Premium with enterprise-grade features. Specific pricing and feature distinctions require contacting Google Cloud sales.
SourceSeaTable: Is SeaTable open source?
No. Seafile, from the same team, is open source. SeaTable is a commercial product with a free self-hosted edition limited to three users.
SeaTable: How does it compare with Airtable on price?
Plus is 7 EUR per user per month billed annually against Airtable Team at 20 USD, but SeaTable applies hard row ceilings on every plan below Enterprise.
SeaTable: Can I move an existing Airtable base across?
Yes, SeaTable imports Airtable bases and Excel files, though formula fields and automations usually need rebuilding by hand.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Looker vs Metabase
- Looker vs Apache Superset
- Looker vs Tableau
- Looker vs Redash
- Looker vs Equals
- Looker vs Sigma Computing
- Looker vs NocoDB
- Looker vs Fibery
- Looker vs Baserow
- Looker vs Budibase
- Looker vs Numbers
- Looker vs Teable
- Looker vs Rowy
- Looker vs Coefficient
- Looker vs Cube Software
- Looker vs APITable
- Looker vs Mathesar
- Looker vs Google Sheets
- SeaTable vs Metabase
- SeaTable vs Apache Superset
- SeaTable vs Tableau
- SeaTable vs Redash
- SeaTable vs Equals
- SeaTable vs Sigma Computing
- SeaTable vs NocoDB
- SeaTable vs Fibery
- SeaTable vs Baserow
- SeaTable vs Budibase
- SeaTable vs Numbers
- SeaTable vs Teable
- SeaTable vs Rowy
- SeaTable vs Coefficient
- SeaTable vs Cube Software
- SeaTable vs APITable
- SeaTable vs Mathesar
- SeaTable vs Google Sheets
