Legal · head to head
Logikcull vs Everlaw
Logikcull
Legal
Self-service ediscovery with predictable pricing
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Logikcull built for self-service, so very large or complex matters still favour the enterprise platforms; Everlaw quote-only pricing, and ediscovery is typically billed on data volume, which makes costs hard to predict in advance
- They diverge on capability: Logikcull covers Automated processing, Everlaw covers Document processing.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Logikcull and Everlaw actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (On request), free tier (No), platforms (Web, Cloud), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Legal).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Logikcull
- Automated processing
- Self-service
- Per-matter pricing
- Search and review
Only in Everlaw
- Document processing
- Predictive coding
- Review workflow
- Search and clustering
- Case building
- Cloud-native
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Logikcull
- Small firms and in-house teams without litigation support staffnot Everlaw
- Matters where volume-based pricing makes budgeting impossiblenot Everlaw
- Internal investigations needing documents searchable in hoursnot Everlaw
Everlaw
- Litigation teams reviewing very large discovery document setsnot Logikcull
- Government and corporate investigations requiring defensible reviewnot Logikcull
- Firms wanting ediscovery without running on-premise infrastructurenot Logikcull
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Logikcull
- Built for self-service, so very large or complex matters still favour the enterprise platforms
- Analytics and predictive coding are lighter than Relativity or Everlaw
- Acquired by Reveal, and roadmap direction under new ownership is a fair question for a buyer
- Per-matter pricing is predictable but not always cheaper on small collections
Everlaw
- Quote-only pricing, and ediscovery is typically billed on data volume, which makes costs hard to predict in advance
- Specialist product: outside litigation and investigations there is no use for it
- Predictive coding requires a properly trained review workflow, and poor input produces unreliable prioritisation
- Data volume charges can escalate sharply on large matters
Pricing, plan by plan
Logikcull
On requestNo published plan breakdown. See the Logikcull review.
Everlaw
On requestNo published plan breakdown. See the Everlaw review.
Which should you pick?
Choose Logikcull if
- You need automated processing.
- You work on Web, Cloud.
- You also want self-service.
Choose Everlaw if
- You need document processing.
- You work on Web, Cloud.
- You also want predictive coding.
Questions people ask
- Is Logikcull or Everlaw better?
- Neither clearly leads. Logikcull starts at On request and Everlaw at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Logikcull or Everlaw?
- Logikcull starts at On request and Everlaw at On request.
- Does Logikcull or Everlaw run on more platforms?
- Both run on Web, Cloud, so platform support will not decide this one for you.
- What is Logikcull best used for?
- Logikcull is most often used for small firms and in-house teams without litigation support staff, matters where volume-based pricing makes budgeting impossible, internal investigations needing documents searchable in hours. Of those, small firms and in-house teams without litigation support staff and matters where volume-based pricing makes budgeting impossible are not what Everlaw is typically brought in for.
- What can Logikcull do that Everlaw cannot?
- Logikcull covers Automated processing, Self-service, Per-matter pricing, Search and review. Everlaw covers Document processing, Predictive coding, Review workflow, Search and clustering.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Logikcull: What does Logikcull cost?
It publishes per-matter and subscription pricing, which is unusual in ediscovery and is much of its appeal.
Everlaw: What does Everlaw cost?
Everlaw does not publish rates. Ediscovery is generally priced on data volume and users, which is why costs are quoted per matter or per organisation.
Logikcull: Do I need a specialist to run it?
No. Processing is automated and review runs in the browser, which is the difference from platforms where certification is a job title.
Everlaw: What is ediscovery?
The process of identifying, collecting and reviewing electronic documents as evidence in litigation or investigation.
Logikcull: When is it not the right tool?
Very large or analytically complex matters, where Relativity and Everlaw have deeper review and predictive coding.
Everlaw: What is predictive coding?
Machine learning trained on reviewer decisions to prioritise documents likely to be relevant, so a team reviews the important fraction rather than everything.
Everlaw: Is Everlaw only for law firms?
No. Corporate legal departments and government agencies use it for investigations as well as litigation.