Cloud · head to head
OVHcloud vs Qovery

Qovery
Cloud
Deployment platform that provisions and operates Kubernetes inside your own cloud account
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: OVHcloud public Cloud pricing table lists a scheduled price change with a column labeled Price on April 1, 2026, showing current rates are promotional and set to change on that date; Qovery no plan publishes a price, deployment minute overage rates are not disclosed, and there is a 14 day trial rather than a free tier, so you cannot budget or compare against alternatives without going through sales.
- They diverge on capability: OVHcloud covers Public Cloud, Qovery covers Bring your own cloud.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which OVHcloud and Qovery actually diverge.
Identical on both: free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Cloud).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in OVHcloud
- Public Cloud
- Private Cloud
- Bare Metal Servers
- Managed Kubernetes
- Object Storage
- Block Storage
- Load Balancers
- Databases
Only in Qovery
- Bring your own cloud
- Preview environments
- Cluster lifecycle
- Terraform provider
- MCP server
- Policy as code
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
OVHcloud
- Managed Kubernetes container orchestration for cloud-native applicationsnot Qovery
- Virtual machine instances with customizable CPU, RAM, and IOPSnot Qovery
- Object storage with S3-compatible API for scalable data archivalnot Qovery
- Managed databases including PostgreSQL, MySQL, MongoDB, and ClickHousenot Qovery
- Private network connectivity with vRack for multi-AZ isolationnot Qovery
Qovery
- A regulated business that must keep application data inside its own AWS account but has nobody to build a deployment platformnot OVHcloud
- Giving twenty engineers preview environments per pull request without writing and maintaining Terraform and Helm by handnot OVHcloud
- Standardising deployment across AWS and GCP when acquisitions have left the organisation on two cloudsnot OVHcloud
- Replacing a managed platform when data residency rules put every hosted option out of reachnot OVHcloud
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
OVHcloud
- Public Cloud pricing table lists a scheduled price change with a column labeled Price on April 1, 2026, showing current rates are promotional and set to change on that date
- Free network traffic and free Object Storage API calls exclude the Asia-Pacific region
Qovery
- No plan publishes a price, deployment minute overage rates are not disclosed, and there is a 14 day trial rather than a free tier, so you cannot budget or compare against alternatives without going through sales.
- The GPL-3.0 engine and console do not constitute a self-hostable product, because the control plane and API are closed and the self-hosted option is gated behind Enterprise, so the open licence gives you no exit if the company changes direction.
- Qovery provisions managed Kubernetes into your account, which means the cloud bill sits on top of the licence and Qovery initiates control plane and ingress controller upgrades on infrastructure your team is accountable for.
- The company repositioned to agentic infrastructure in June 2026 and now ships a deployment platform, a browser development portal and autonomous coding agents concurrently, so a buyer of the deployment product is not at the centre of the roadmap.
- Team and Business are capped at two and three connected clusters with fixed 4 vCPU CI runners and no single sign-on on Team, which pushes teams of moderate size onto quoted Enterprise pricing earlier than the plan names imply.
Pricing, plan by plan
OVHcloud
€3.5/month- Public Cloud Starter$3.5/month
- 1 vCPU
- 1 GB RAM
- 10 GB storage
- Bare Metal$49/month
- Dedicated hardware
- High performance
- Full control
Qovery
On request- Team$undefined/year
- Billed on usage with no published rate card
- 10 users, up to 100 environments, 2 connected clusters
- 5,000 deployment minutes and 7 day audit logs
- Business$undefined/year
- Billed on usage with no published rate card
- 20 users, up to 250 environments, 3 connected clusters
- 10,000 deployment minutes and 30 day audit logs
- Enterprise$undefined/year
- Custom users, environments and clusters
- Self-hosted or air-gapped control plane
- On-premises and bring-your-own-Kubernetes
Which should you pick?
Choose OVHcloud if
- You need public cloud.
- You work on Linux, Windows, Api, Cli.
- You also want private cloud.
Choose Qovery if
- You need bring your own cloud.
- You work on Web, CLI, REST API, Kubernetes.
- You also want preview environments.
Questions people ask
- Is OVHcloud or Qovery better?
- Neither clearly leads. OVHcloud starts at €3.5/month and Qovery at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, OVHcloud or Qovery?
- OVHcloud starts at €3.5/month and Qovery at On request.
- Does OVHcloud or Qovery run on more platforms?
- OVHcloud runs on Linux, Windows, Api, Cli. Qovery runs on Web, CLI, REST API, Kubernetes.
- What is OVHcloud best used for?
- OVHcloud is most often used for managed kubernetes container orchestration for cloud-native applications, virtual machine instances with customizable cpu, ram, and iops, object storage with s3-compatible api for scalable data archival, managed databases including postgresql, mysql, mongodb, and clickhouse. Of those, managed kubernetes container orchestration for cloud-native applications and virtual machine instances with customizable cpu, ram, and iops are not what Qovery is typically brought in for.
- What can OVHcloud do that Qovery cannot?
- OVHcloud covers Public Cloud, Private Cloud, Bare Metal Servers, Managed Kubernetes. Qovery covers Bring your own cloud, Preview environments, Cluster lifecycle, Terraform provider.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
OVHcloud: How does OVHcloud charge for cloud services?
OVHcloud offers pay-as-you-go pricing for compute, storage, and bandwidth. Specific per-unit costs are accessed through the pricing calculator on the vendor site.
SourceQovery: Does Qovery run my applications on its own servers?
No. It provisions and operates Kubernetes inside your AWS, GCP, Azure or Scaleway account, so compute and data stay with your cloud provider and that bill is entirely separate from the Qovery licence.
OVHcloud: Are there savings plans for OVHcloud services?
OVHcloud mentions savings plan options on its services pages, but pricing discounts and commitment terms are not detailed on the homepage.
SourceQovery: Can I self-host Qovery?
Only on Enterprise. The deployment engine and console are GPL-3.0, but the control plane is closed source and the self-hosted and air-gapped deployments are commercial Enterprise features.
OVHcloud: What is the cost of OVHcloud zero inter-AZ fees?
OVHcloud advertises zero inter-AZ (availability zone) fees for data transfers within its network. Monthly subscription rates for individual services are not published on the vendor homepage.
SourceQovery: What does it cost?
Qovery does not publish a rate card. Team and Business are billed on usage and quoted through sales, and Enterprise is fully custom. There is a 14 day trial with no card required.
Qovery: What survives if I stop paying?
The Kubernetes cluster and the workloads keep running in your cloud account, but you lose the console, the deployment pipeline, preview environments and every process built on top of them.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- OVHcloud vs AWS (Amazon Web Services)
- OVHcloud vs DigitalOcean
- OVHcloud vs Grafana Cloud
- OVHcloud vs Neon
- OVHcloud vs Scaleway
- OVHcloud vs Oracle Cloud
- OVHcloud vs IBM Cloud
- OVHcloud vs Lambda
- OVHcloud vs Vultr
- OVHcloud vs Alibaba Cloud
- OVHcloud vs Tencent Cloud
- OVHcloud vs Chef
- OVHcloud vs Rancher
- OVHcloud vs Upstash
- OVHcloud vs Azure Functions
- OVHcloud vs Deno Deploy
- OVHcloud vs Hetzner Cloud
- OVHcloud vs Infracost
- OVHcloud vs Render
- OVHcloud vs Porter
- OVHcloud vs Northflank
- OVHcloud vs CapRover
- OVHcloud vs Coolify
- OVHcloud vs Railway
- OVHcloud vs Dokku
- OVHcloud vs Portworx
- OVHcloud vs Podman
- OVHcloud vs containerd
- OVHcloud vs Encore
- OVHcloud vs Orca Security
- OVHcloud vs Packer
- OVHcloud vs OpenTelemetry
- OVHcloud vs Rook
- Qovery vs AWS (Amazon Web Services)
- Qovery vs DigitalOcean
- Qovery vs Grafana Cloud
- Qovery vs Neon
- Qovery vs Scaleway
- Qovery vs Oracle Cloud
- Qovery vs IBM Cloud
- Qovery vs Lambda
- Qovery vs Vultr
- Qovery vs Alibaba Cloud
- Qovery vs Tencent Cloud
- Qovery vs Chef
- Qovery vs Rancher
- Qovery vs Upstash
- Qovery vs Azure Functions
- Qovery vs Deno Deploy
- Qovery vs Hetzner Cloud
- Qovery vs Infracost
- Qovery vs Render
- Qovery vs Porter
- Qovery vs Northflank
- Qovery vs CapRover
- Qovery vs Coolify
- Qovery vs Railway
- Qovery vs Dokku
- Qovery vs Portworx
- Qovery vs Podman
- Qovery vs containerd
- Qovery vs Encore
- Qovery vs Orca Security
- Qovery vs Packer
- Qovery vs OpenTelemetry
- Qovery vs Rook

