Cloud · head to head
Kustomize vs Spring Cloud Gateway

Spring Cloud Gateway
APIs
API gateway built on Project Reactor for building microservices
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Kustomize no packaging or distribution story, which is exactly what Helm charts provide; Spring Cloud Gateway released under the Apache 2.0 license, free and open source with no commercial tier
- They diverge on capability: Kustomize covers Overlay patching, Spring Cloud Gateway covers Routing.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Kustomize and Spring Cloud Gateway actually diverge.
| Attribute | Kustomize | Spring Cloud Gateway |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Open source, no licence fee | open-source |
| Platforms | Kubernetes, Linux, macOS, Windows | Java, Spring Boot |
| Category | Cloud | APIs |
| Founded | Unknown | 1998 |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Kustomize
- Overlay patching
- No templating language
- Built into kubectl
- Generators
Only in Spring Cloud Gateway
- Routing
- Path Rewriting
- Circuit Breaker
- Spring Boot
- Spring Security
- Spring Cloud
- Java support
- Spring Boot support
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Kustomize
- Managing dev, staging and production variants of the same manifestsnot Spring Cloud Gateway
- Keeping manifests readable and directly applyable rather than templatednot Spring Cloud Gateway
- Patching third-party manifests without forking themnot Spring Cloud Gateway
Spring Cloud Gateway
- API Developmentnot Kustomize
- API Gatewaynot Kustomize
- API Testingnot Kustomize
- API Documentationnot Kustomize
- Microservicesnot Kustomize
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Kustomize
- No packaging or distribution story, which is exactly what Helm charts provide
- Deeply nested overlays become hard to follow, and reasoning about the final output requires building it
- No release lifecycle: nothing tracks what is installed or supports rollback the way Helm does
- Patch syntax is fiddly for anything beyond simple field replacement
Spring Cloud Gateway
- Released under the Apache 2.0 license, free and open source with no commercial tier
Pricing, plan by plan
Kustomize
Free- KustomizeFree
- Full functionality
- No usage limits
- Community support
Spring Cloud Gateway
Free- Open SourceFree
- Core Spring Cloud Gateway
- Community support
Which should you pick?
Choose Kustomize if
- You need overlay patching.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Kubernetes, Linux, macOS, Windows.
- You also want no templating language.
Choose Spring Cloud Gateway if
- You need routing.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Java, Spring Boot.
- You also want path rewriting.
Questions people ask
- Is Kustomize or Spring Cloud Gateway better?
- Neither clearly leads. Kustomize starts at Free and Spring Cloud Gateway at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Kustomize or Spring Cloud Gateway?
- Kustomize starts at Free and Spring Cloud Gateway at Free.
- Does Kustomize or Spring Cloud Gateway run on more platforms?
- Kustomize runs on Kubernetes, Linux, macOS, Windows. Spring Cloud Gateway runs on Java, Spring Boot.
- Can I use Kustomize for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Kustomize best used for?
- Kustomize is most often used for managing dev, staging and production variants of the same manifests, keeping manifests readable and directly applyable rather than templated, patching third-party manifests without forking them. Of those, managing dev, staging and production variants of the same manifests and keeping manifests readable and directly applyable rather than templated are not what Spring Cloud Gateway is typically brought in for.
- What can Kustomize do that Spring Cloud Gateway cannot?
- Kustomize covers Overlay patching, No templating language, Built into kubectl, Generators. Spring Cloud Gateway covers Routing, Path Rewriting, Circuit Breaker, Spring Boot.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Kustomize: Is Kustomize free?
Yes, open source and part of the Kubernetes project.
Spring Cloud Gateway: Is Spring Cloud Gateway free?
Yes, Spring Cloud Gateway is free and open-source software. It is part of the Spring ecosystem and available through GitHub repositories with open-source dependencies like spring-cloud-starter-gateway-server-webflux and spring-cloud-starter-gateway-server-webmvc.
SourceKustomize: Kustomize or Helm?
Kustomize patches plain YAML and keeps bases readable; Helm templates and packages applications with a release lifecycle. Many teams use both — Helm to install third-party charts, Kustomize to patch them.
Spring Cloud Gateway: What enterprise support is available for Spring Cloud Gateway?
Tanzu Spring provides optional enterprise support including Day 0 access to security patches for organizations requiring guaranteed support, but specific pricing is not published on the Spring Cloud Gateway project page.
SourceKustomize: Do I need to install Kustomize?
No. It is built into kubectl, available through kubectl apply -k.
Related pages
More on Spring Cloud Gateway
Other head to heads
- Kustomize vs Portworx
- Kustomize vs Podman
- Kustomize vs Rancher
- Kustomize vs DigitalOcean
- Kustomize vs Pulumi
- Kustomize vs Caddy
- Kustomize vs Packer
- Kustomize vs Porter
- Kustomize vs Crossplane
- Kustomize vs IBM Cloud
- Kustomize vs Koyeb
- Kustomize vs Microsoft Azure
- Kustomize vs Nitric
- Kustomize vs OpenEBS
- Kustomize vs Buildah
- Kustomize vs K3s
- Kustomize vs Vagrant
- Kustomize vs Nomad
- Kustomize vs Appwrite
- Kustomize vs Hasura
- Kustomize vs PocketBase
- Kustomize vs Sanity
- Kustomize vs Kong Gateway
- Kustomize vs Tyk
- Kustomize vs Janus Gateway
- Kustomize vs Convoy
- Kustomize vs WSO2 API Manager
- Kustomize vs Gravitee
- Kustomize vs KeystoneJS
- Kustomize vs Strapi
- Kustomize vs Swagger/OpenAPI
- Kustomize vs Thredd
- Kustomize vs Thunder Client
- Kustomize vs Toqio
- Kustomize vs Kong
- Spring Cloud Gateway vs Portworx
- Spring Cloud Gateway vs Podman
- Spring Cloud Gateway vs Rancher
- Spring Cloud Gateway vs DigitalOcean
- Spring Cloud Gateway vs Pulumi
- Spring Cloud Gateway vs Caddy
- Spring Cloud Gateway vs Packer
- Spring Cloud Gateway vs Porter
- Spring Cloud Gateway vs Crossplane
- Spring Cloud Gateway vs IBM Cloud
- Spring Cloud Gateway vs Koyeb
- Spring Cloud Gateway vs Microsoft Azure
- Spring Cloud Gateway vs Nitric
- Spring Cloud Gateway vs OpenEBS
- Spring Cloud Gateway vs Buildah
- Spring Cloud Gateway vs K3s
- Spring Cloud Gateway vs Vagrant
- Spring Cloud Gateway vs Nomad
- Spring Cloud Gateway vs Appwrite
- Spring Cloud Gateway vs Hasura
- Spring Cloud Gateway vs PocketBase
- Spring Cloud Gateway vs Sanity
- Spring Cloud Gateway vs Kong Gateway
- Spring Cloud Gateway vs Tyk
- Spring Cloud Gateway vs Janus Gateway
- Spring Cloud Gateway vs Convoy
- Spring Cloud Gateway vs WSO2 API Manager
- Spring Cloud Gateway vs Gravitee
- Spring Cloud Gateway vs KeystoneJS
- Spring Cloud Gateway vs Strapi
- Spring Cloud Gateway vs Swagger/OpenAPI
- Spring Cloud Gateway vs Thredd
- Spring Cloud Gateway vs Thunder Client
- Spring Cloud Gateway vs Toqio
- Spring Cloud Gateway vs Kong

