Backup · head to head
Kopia vs Vault

Kopia
Backup
Open source deduplicating backup with client side encryption and a repository on almost any storage
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Kopia space is only reclaimed when maintenance runs, and in a shared repository full maintenance is owned by one client, so if that machine goes away the repository grows for ever while every backup still reports success.; Vault vault 1.15.0 and later is licensed under the Business Source License 1.1, not an OSI open source licence, with IBM Corporation as licensor
- They diverge on capability: Kopia covers Content defined chunking, Vault covers Secrets management.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Kopia and Vault actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Kopia
- Content defined chunking
- Global deduplication
- Pack blobs
- Client side encryption
- Desktop and command line
- Repository verification
Only in Vault
- Secrets management
- Encryption
- Authentication
- Authorization
- Audit logging
- API access
- High availability
- Replication
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Kopia
- Backing up laptops and workstations to cheap object storage with a desktop interface rather than a cron jobnot Vault
- Deduplicating backups of several similar machines into one repository so common content is stored oncenot Vault
- Replacing a chunk based tool whose per object charges made a cheap bucket expensivenot Vault
- Keeping an encrypted offsite copy where the storage provider must never be able to read the contentsnot Vault
Vault
- Centrally storing and rotating secrets, API keys and database credentialsnot Kopia
- Issuing short-lived dynamic credentials to applications instead of static passwordsnot Kopia
- Encryption as a service and PKI certificate issuancenot Kopia
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Kopia
- Space is only reclaimed when maintenance runs, and in a shared repository full maintenance is owned by one client, so if that machine goes away the repository grows for ever while every backup still reports success.
- The repository format has changed across versions and mixing client versions against one repository is discouraged, so a fleet must be upgraded together rather than machine by machine.
- There is no central orchestration or reporting for many machines, so monitoring a fleet means building your own alerting around exit codes.
- Restoring many small files is slower than the backup was, because content must be reassembled from pack blobs, and this is rarely tested until the day it matters.
- Encryption is client side with no escrow, so a lost repository password means the data is unrecoverable and there is no vendor to appeal to.
Vault
- Vault 1.15.0 and later is licensed under the Business Source License 1.1, not an OSI open source licence, with IBM Corporation as licensor
- The Additional Use Grant forbids offering Vault to third parties on a hosted or embedded basis in a paid product that competes with IBM's paid versions of Vault
- Each version only converts to MPL 2.0 four years after that version is published, and the Change Date is tracked per version
- Replication, HSM support, namespaces, performance standby nodes, FIPS builds, control group authorisation, multi-factor authentication, secrets sync and lease count quotas all require a Vault Enterprise licence
- A Vault Enterprise licence must be applied to the cluster before any Enterprise feature can be used
Pricing, plan by plan
Kopia
Free- KopiaFree
- Full functionality, no data limit
- Desktop application included
- Any supported storage back end
Vault
Free- Open SourceFree
- Secrets management
- Encryption as a service
- Identity management
- EnterpriseFree
- Advanced features
- Premium support
- Dedicated updates
Which should you pick?
Choose Kopia if
- You need content defined chunking.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, macOS, Windows, Docker.
- You also want global deduplication.
Choose Vault if
- You need secrets management.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, Windows, Mac, Cloud.
- You also want encryption.
Questions people ask
- Is Kopia or Vault better?
- Neither clearly leads. Kopia starts at Free and Vault at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Kopia or Vault?
- Kopia starts at Free and Vault at Free.
- Does Kopia or Vault run on more platforms?
- Kopia runs on Linux, macOS, Windows, Docker. Vault runs on Linux, Windows, Mac, Cloud.
- Can I use Kopia for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Kopia best used for?
- Kopia is most often used for backing up laptops and workstations to cheap object storage with a desktop interface rather than a cron job, deduplicating backups of several similar machines into one repository so common content is stored once, replacing a chunk based tool whose per object charges made a cheap bucket expensive, keeping an encrypted offsite copy where the storage provider must never be able to read the contents. Of those, backing up laptops and workstations to cheap object storage with a desktop interface rather than a cron job and deduplicating backups of several similar machines into one repository so common content is stored once are not what Vault is typically brought in for.
- What can Kopia do that Vault cannot?
- Kopia covers Content defined chunking, Global deduplication, Pack blobs, Client side encryption. Vault covers Secrets management, Encryption, Authentication, Authorization.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Kopia: Is a partly corrupt repository still restorable?
Partly. Deduplication means one damaged pack blob affects every snapshot referencing its contents, but unaffected files still restore. Run verification regularly rather than assuming.
Vault: Is HashiCorp Vault free to use?
Yes, Vault is available as a free, open-source project. The community version includes secrets management, certificate generation and rotation, encryption services, and credential management. Vault Enterprise is a commercial offering with additional features.
SourceKopia: How does it compare with restic?
Similar guarantees, with packing that behaves better on per operation billing, a desktop interface, and compression enabled by default.
Vault: What are the differences between open-source Vault and Vault Enterprise?
Open-source Vault is free and self-hosted. Vault Enterprise includes additional features and commercial support. HashiCorp also offers Vault Dedicated on the HashiCorp Cloud Platform as a fully managed cloud option.
SourceKopia: Do I need to run maintenance manually?
It is scheduled automatically by default, but you must ensure the client that owns full maintenance keeps running, otherwise deleted snapshots never free space.
Vault: Can I try HashiCorp Cloud Platform Vault without payment?
Yes, HashiCorp offers a free trial option for HCP Vault Dedicated. New users also receive a $500 credit to use across HashiCorp Cloud Platform services.
SourceKopia: Can several machines share one repository?
Yes, and that is where deduplication pays off, but they should run compatible versions and only one owns full maintenance.
Vault: What does Vault manage and protect?
Vault provides identity-based secrets management for users, machines, services, and AI agents. It automates authentication and authorization for access to secrets, passwords, certificates, encryption keys, and other sensitive data across your infrastructure.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- Kopia vs rustic
- Kopia vs Borg Backup
- Kopia vs Duplicacy
- Kopia vs Restic
- Kopia vs Proxmox Backup Server
- Kopia vs UrBackup
- Kopia vs Velero
- Kopia vs HPE StoreOnce
- Kopia vs Portworx Backup
- Kopia vs Trilio
- Kopia vs Acronis Cyber Protect
- Kopia vs BDRShield
- Kopia vs CloudCasa
- Kopia vs Cohesity DataProtect
- Kopia vs Datto Backup
- Kopia vs MSP360 Backup
- Kopia vs AWS (Amazon Web Services)
- Kopia vs DigitalOcean
- Kopia vs Grafana Cloud
- Kopia vs Neon
- Kopia vs Crossplane
- Kopia vs Microsoft Azure
- Kopia vs Podman
- Kopia vs Hetzner Cloud
- Kopia vs Linode
- Kopia vs Vultr
- Kopia vs Akamai
- Kopia vs Alibaba Cloud
- Kopia vs CapRover
- Kopia vs Chef
- Kopia vs Buildah
- Vault vs rustic
- Vault vs Borg Backup
- Vault vs Duplicacy
- Vault vs Restic
- Vault vs Proxmox Backup Server
- Vault vs UrBackup
- Vault vs Velero
- Vault vs HPE StoreOnce
- Vault vs Portworx Backup
- Vault vs Trilio
- Vault vs Acronis Cyber Protect
- Vault vs BDRShield
- Vault vs CloudCasa
- Vault vs Cohesity DataProtect
- Vault vs Datto Backup
- Vault vs MSP360 Backup
- Vault vs AWS (Amazon Web Services)
- Vault vs DigitalOcean
- Vault vs Grafana Cloud
- Vault vs Neon
- Vault vs Crossplane
- Vault vs Microsoft Azure
- Vault vs Podman
- Vault vs Hetzner Cloud
- Vault vs Linode
- Vault vs Vultr
- Vault vs Akamai
- Vault vs Alibaba Cloud
- Vault vs CapRover
- Vault vs Chef
- Vault vs Buildah

