Backup · head to head
Kopia vs Paragon Backup & Recovery

Kopia
Backup
Open source deduplicating backup with client side encryption and a repository on almost any storage
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

Paragon Backup & Recovery
Backup
Professional-grade backup for Windows
- From
- $50/year
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Kopia has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Kopia space is only reclaimed when maintenance runs, and in a shared repository full maintenance is owned by one client, so if that machine goes away the repository grows for ever while every backup still reports success.; Paragon Backup & Recovery the free Community Edition is licensed for non-commercial use only
- They diverge on capability: Kopia covers Content defined chunking, Paragon Backup & Recovery covers Full disk backup.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Kopia and Paragon Backup & Recovery actually diverge.
| Attribute | Kopia | Paragon Backup & Recovery |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | Free | $50/year |
| Pricing model | Open source, no licence fee | subscription |
| Free tier | Yes | No |
| Platforms | Linux, macOS, Windows, Docker | Windows |
| Founded | Unknown | 1994 |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (Backup).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Kopia
- Content defined chunking
- Global deduplication
- Pack blobs
- Client side encryption
- Desktop and command line
- Repository verification
Only in Paragon Backup & Recovery
- Full disk backup
- File-level backup
- Incremental/differential
- Recovery media
- Virtual disk mount
- UEFI support
- Windows
- Network shares
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Kopia
- Backing up laptops and workstations to cheap object storage with a desktop interface rather than a cron jobnot Paragon Backup & Recovery
- Deduplicating backups of several similar machines into one repository so common content is stored oncenot Paragon Backup & Recovery
- Replacing a chunk based tool whose per object charges made a cheap bucket expensivenot Paragon Backup & Recovery
- Keeping an encrypted offsite copy where the storage provider must never be able to read the contentsnot Paragon Backup & Recovery
Paragon Backup & Recovery
- Full disk and partition backup on Windowsnot Kopia
- Bare metal recovery from an imagenot Kopia
- Scheduled incremental backups for a home machinenot Kopia
- Migrating an installation to a new drive on the paid editionsnot Kopia
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Kopia
- Space is only reclaimed when maintenance runs, and in a shared repository full maintenance is owned by one client, so if that machine goes away the repository grows for ever while every backup still reports success.
- The repository format has changed across versions and mixing client versions against one repository is discouraged, so a fleet must be upgraded together rather than machine by machine.
- There is no central orchestration or reporting for many machines, so monitoring a fleet means building your own alerting around exit codes.
- Restoring many small files is slower than the backup was, because content must be reassembled from pack blobs, and this is rarely tested until the day it matters.
- Encryption is client side with no escrow, so a lost repository password means the data is unrecoverable and there is no vendor to appeal to.
Paragon Backup & Recovery
- The free Community Edition is licensed for non-commercial use only
- Windows only, and specifically Windows 10 x64 from 1809, Windows 11 x64 and Windows 11 Arm64
- Volume and OS copying, partition management and email notifications need the Advanced edition
- Windows Server support requires the Business edition
- Paid edition prices are not shown on the product page
Pricing, plan by plan
Kopia
Free- KopiaFree
- Full functionality, no data limit
- Desktop application included
- Any supported storage back end
Paragon Backup & Recovery
$50/year- Community Edition$50/year
- Full disk backup
- File-level backup
- Recovery media
Which should you pick?
Choose Kopia if
- You need content defined chunking.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, macOS, Windows, Docker.
- You also want global deduplication.
Choose Paragon Backup & Recovery if
- You need full disk backup.
- You work on Windows.
- You also want file-level backup.
Questions people ask
- Is Kopia or Paragon Backup & Recovery better?
- Neither clearly leads. Kopia starts at Free and Paragon Backup & Recovery at $50/year, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Kopia or Paragon Backup & Recovery?
- Kopia has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for Kopia and $50/year for Paragon Backup & Recovery.
- Does Kopia or Paragon Backup & Recovery run on more platforms?
- Kopia runs on Linux, macOS, Windows, Docker. Paragon Backup & Recovery runs on Windows.
- Can I use Kopia for free?
- Yes. Kopia has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Paragon Backup & Recovery starts at $50/year.
- What is Kopia best used for?
- Kopia is most often used for backing up laptops and workstations to cheap object storage with a desktop interface rather than a cron job, deduplicating backups of several similar machines into one repository so common content is stored once, replacing a chunk based tool whose per object charges made a cheap bucket expensive, keeping an encrypted offsite copy where the storage provider must never be able to read the contents. Of those, backing up laptops and workstations to cheap object storage with a desktop interface rather than a cron job and deduplicating backups of several similar machines into one repository so common content is stored once are not what Paragon Backup & Recovery is typically brought in for.
- What can Kopia do that Paragon Backup & Recovery cannot?
- Kopia covers Content defined chunking, Global deduplication, Pack blobs, Client side encryption. Paragon Backup & Recovery covers Full disk backup, File-level backup, Incremental/differential, Recovery media.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Kopia: Is a partly corrupt repository still restorable?
Partly. Deduplication means one damaged pack blob affects every snapshot referencing its contents, but unaffected files still restore. Run verification regularly rather than assuming.
Paragon Backup & Recovery: Is Paragon Backup & Recovery still available?
No, Paragon Backup & Recovery has been unavailable since October 8, 2025, and is marked as a legacy product. Business customers are directed to explore alternative products for business use.
SourceKopia: How does it compare with restic?
Similar guarantees, with packing that behaves better on per operation billing, a desktop interface, and compression enabled by default.
Paragon Backup & Recovery: How much does Paragon Backup & Recovery cost?
No pricing information is published. The product is restricted to home use only and customers must contact Paragon's sales team directly for any inquiries.
SourceKopia: Do I need to run maintenance manually?
It is scheduled automatically by default, but you must ensure the client that owns full maintenance keeps running, otherwise deleted snapshots never free space.
Paragon Backup & Recovery: What should business users do if they used Paragon Backup & Recovery?
Business customers are recommended to explore the company's other products designed for business use and contact the sales team for alternative solutions.
SourceKopia: Can several machines share one repository?
Yes, and that is where deduplication pays off, but they should run compatible versions and only one owns full maintenance.
Related pages
More on Paragon Backup & Recovery
Other head to heads
- Kopia vs rustic
- Kopia vs Borg Backup
- Kopia vs Duplicacy
- Kopia vs Restic
- Kopia vs Proxmox Backup Server
- Kopia vs UrBackup
- Kopia vs Velero
- Kopia vs HPE StoreOnce
- Kopia vs Portworx Backup
- Kopia vs Trilio
- Kopia vs Acronis Cyber Protect
- Kopia vs BDRShield
- Kopia vs CloudCasa
- Kopia vs Cohesity DataProtect
- Kopia vs Datto Backup
- Kopia vs MSP360 Backup
- Kopia vs Backupify
- Kopia vs Spanning Backup
- Kopia vs CloudAlly
- Kopia vs Commvault Complete Data Protection
- Kopia vs AOMEI Backupper
- Kopia vs EaseUS Todo Backup
- Kopia vs Macrium Reflect
- Kopia vs Rubrik Cloud Data Management
- Kopia vs Datto SIRIS
- Kopia vs N-able Backup
- Kopia vs OwnBackup
- Kopia vs Veeam Kasten for Kubernetes
- Kopia vs Amanda Enterprise
- Paragon Backup & Recovery vs rustic
- Paragon Backup & Recovery vs Borg Backup
- Paragon Backup & Recovery vs Duplicacy
- Paragon Backup & Recovery vs Restic
- Paragon Backup & Recovery vs Proxmox Backup Server
- Paragon Backup & Recovery vs UrBackup
- Paragon Backup & Recovery vs Velero
- Paragon Backup & Recovery vs HPE StoreOnce
- Paragon Backup & Recovery vs Portworx Backup
- Paragon Backup & Recovery vs Trilio
- Paragon Backup & Recovery vs Acronis Cyber Protect
- Paragon Backup & Recovery vs BDRShield
- Paragon Backup & Recovery vs CloudCasa
- Paragon Backup & Recovery vs Cohesity DataProtect
- Paragon Backup & Recovery vs Datto Backup
- Paragon Backup & Recovery vs MSP360 Backup
- Paragon Backup & Recovery vs Backupify
- Paragon Backup & Recovery vs Spanning Backup
- Paragon Backup & Recovery vs CloudAlly
- Paragon Backup & Recovery vs Commvault Complete Data Protection
- Paragon Backup & Recovery vs AOMEI Backupper
- Paragon Backup & Recovery vs EaseUS Todo Backup
- Paragon Backup & Recovery vs Macrium Reflect
- Paragon Backup & Recovery vs Rubrik Cloud Data Management
- Paragon Backup & Recovery vs Datto SIRIS
- Paragon Backup & Recovery vs N-able Backup
- Paragon Backup & Recovery vs OwnBackup
- Paragon Backup & Recovery vs Veeam Kasten for Kubernetes
- Paragon Backup & Recovery vs Amanda Enterprise
