APIs · head to head
Kong Gateway vs NocoDB

Kong Gateway
APIs
Open-source and cloud API gateway for managing microservices traffic
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

NocoDB
Spreadsheets
Open-source no-code database platform with REST and GraphQL APIs
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Kong Gateway the free open-source gateway lacks the analytics, portals, and support of the paid Konnect tiers.; NocoDB the free cloud tier is capped at 3 editor seats, 1,000 records and 1 GB of storage
- They diverge on capability: Kong Gateway covers API request routing, NocoDB covers REST API.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Kong Gateway and NocoDB actually diverge.
| Attribute | Kong Gateway | NocoDB |
|---|---|---|
| Platforms | web, linux, api | Cloud, Self-hosted, Docker |
| Category | APIs | Spreadsheets |
| Founded | 2017 | 2020 |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), pricing model (freemium), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Kong Gateway
- API request routing
- Plugin ecosystem
- Developer portals
- AI Gateway
- Analytics and observability
- SSO and audit logs
Only in NocoDB
- REST API
- GraphQL API
- No-code database
- Multiple SQL databases
- Webhooks
- Automation
- Cloud support
- Self-hosted support
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Kong Gateway
- Routing and securing traffic across microservicesnot NocoDB
- Publishing internal or external developer portalsnot NocoDB
- Managing rate limits and authentication at the API edgenot NocoDB
- Gateway-level routing to multiple LLM providersnot NocoDB
NocoDB
- Self-hosting an open source alternative to a spreadsheet databasenot Kong Gateway
- Putting a spreadsheet interface over an existing Postgres or MySQL databasenot Kong Gateway
- Building internal tools on structured data with an APInot Kong Gateway
- Team bases with per-field and per-table permissions on the paid tiersnot Kong Gateway
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Kong Gateway
- The free open-source gateway lacks the analytics, portals, and support of the paid Konnect tiers.
- Plus tier caps API requests at 1M/month before incurring per-million overage charges.
- Enterprise pricing is custom and not published, making budgeting harder without sales contact.
- Configuration and plugin management can require significant operational expertise to run at scale.
NocoDB
- The free cloud tier is capped at 3 editor seats, 1,000 records and 1 GB of storage
- Records are the metering unit on cloud, so Plus covers 50K and Business 300K rather than scaling by seat alone
- Row-level security, audit log retention and team hierarchy require the Scale tier
- SCIM provisioning and air-gapped deployment are Enterprise only
- The self-hosted Community edition is unlimited on records and seats but does without workflows, scripts and dashboards, which start at the paid self-hosted tiers
Pricing, plan by plan
Kong Gateway
Free- Free TrialFree
- 30-day enterprise functionality trial
- Unlimited gateways
- 30-day analytics retention
- Plus$undefined/month
- Up to 5 serverless, 2 hybrid, 2 dedicated cloud gateways
- 1M API requests/month included
- Up to 2 developer portals
- Enterprise$undefined/month
- Unlimited hybrid and dedicated cloud gateways
- Unlimited developer portals
- SSO and audit logs
NocoDB
Free- Free (Cloud)Free
- 3 editor seats
- 10 commenter seats
- 1 GB storage
- Plus$12/month
- Unlimited seats
- 50,000 records
- 20 GB storage
- Business$24/month
- Unlimited seats
- 300,000 records
- 100 GB storage
- Scale$45/month
- Minimum 3 seats required
- 1,000,000 records
- 150 GB storage
Which should you pick?
Choose Kong Gateway if
- You need api request routing.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on web, linux, api.
- You also want plugin ecosystem.
Choose NocoDB if
- You need rest api.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Cloud, Self-hosted, Docker.
- You also want graphql api.
Questions people ask
- Is Kong Gateway or NocoDB better?
- Neither clearly leads. Kong Gateway starts at Free and NocoDB at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Kong Gateway or NocoDB?
- Kong Gateway starts at Free and NocoDB at Free.
- Does Kong Gateway or NocoDB run on more platforms?
- Kong Gateway runs on web, linux, api. NocoDB runs on Cloud, Self-hosted, Docker.
- Can I use Kong Gateway for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Kong Gateway best used for?
- Kong Gateway is most often used for routing and securing traffic across microservices, publishing internal or external developer portals, managing rate limits and authentication at the api edge, gateway-level routing to multiple llm providers. Of those, routing and securing traffic across microservices and publishing internal or external developer portals are not what NocoDB is typically brought in for.
- What can Kong Gateway do that NocoDB cannot?
- Kong Gateway covers API request routing, Plugin ecosystem, Developer portals, AI Gateway. NocoDB covers REST API, GraphQL API, No-code database, Multiple SQL databases.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Kong Gateway: Is Kong Gateway free?
Kong's core gateway is open source and free to self-host. Kong Konnect, the managed cloud platform, offers a 30-day free trial before moving to paid Plus or custom Enterprise pricing.
SourceNocoDB: Is NocoDB free?
Yes, NocoDB offers a free cloud plan with 3 editor seats, 1,000 records, 1 GB storage, and 1,000 API calls per month. A free self-hosted Community edition with unlimited records and seats is also available.
SourceKong Gateway: How is usage metered on the Plus plan?
The Plus plan includes 1M API requests per month, with additional usage billed at $200 per extra 1 million requests up to a 10M/month cap, plus per-gateway and per-LLM-model charges.
SourceNocoDB: How much does NocoDB Plus cost?
NocoDB Plus costs $12 per seat per month (billed annually) or $15 per seat per month (monthly). For unlimited seats, it costs $108/month annually or $180/month monthly. Plus includes 50,000 records, 20 GB storage, and 100,000 API calls per month.
SourceKong Gateway: What support is included?
Plus includes email support with a 2-business-day SLA, while Enterprise adds dedicated success managers and professional services.
SourceNocoDB: What is the difference between NocoDB Plus and Business plans?
Plus ($12/seat annual) includes 50,000 records and 100,000 API calls per month. Business ($24/seat annual) includes 300,000 records, 1,000,000 API calls per month, external database connections, SAML SSO, and table/field permissions.
SourceNocoDB: Can I self-host NocoDB for free?
Yes, NocoDB's Community edition is free for self-hosting. It includes unlimited records, storage, and seats, with all core features including webhooks and 6 view types.
SourceRelated pages
More on Kong Gateway
Other head to heads
- Kong Gateway vs Tyk
- Kong Gateway vs Moesif
- Kong Gateway vs Treblle
- Kong Gateway vs Convoy
- Kong Gateway vs Janus Gateway
- Kong Gateway vs Spring Cloud Gateway
- Kong Gateway vs Gravitee
- Kong Gateway vs Strapi
- Kong Gateway vs WSO2 API Manager
- Kong Gateway vs AWS API Gateway
- Kong Gateway vs GraphQL Apollo
- Kong Gateway vs Appwrite
- Kong Gateway vs Payload CMS
- Kong Gateway vs Portkey
- Kong Gateway vs Prisma
- Kong Gateway vs RapidAPI
- Kong Gateway vs REST Client VSCode
- Kong Gateway vs Rutter
- Kong Gateway vs APITable
- Kong Gateway vs Teable
- Kong Gateway vs Looker
- Kong Gateway vs SeaTable
- Kong Gateway vs Tableau
- Kong Gateway vs Metabase
- Kong Gateway vs Redash
- Kong Gateway vs Mathesar
- Kong Gateway vs Baserow
- Kong Gateway vs Budibase
- Kong Gateway vs Fibery
- Kong Gateway vs Apache Superset
- Kong Gateway vs Coefficient
- Kong Gateway vs Cube Software
- Kong Gateway vs Quadratic
- Kong Gateway vs Rowy
- NocoDB vs Tyk
- NocoDB vs Moesif
- NocoDB vs Treblle
- NocoDB vs Convoy
- NocoDB vs Janus Gateway
- NocoDB vs Spring Cloud Gateway
- NocoDB vs Gravitee
- NocoDB vs Strapi
- NocoDB vs WSO2 API Manager
- NocoDB vs AWS API Gateway
- NocoDB vs GraphQL Apollo
- NocoDB vs Appwrite
- NocoDB vs Payload CMS
- NocoDB vs Portkey
- NocoDB vs Prisma
- NocoDB vs RapidAPI
- NocoDB vs REST Client VSCode
- NocoDB vs Rutter
- NocoDB vs APITable
- NocoDB vs Teable
- NocoDB vs Looker
- NocoDB vs SeaTable
- NocoDB vs Tableau
- NocoDB vs Metabase
- NocoDB vs Redash
- NocoDB vs Mathesar
- NocoDB vs Baserow
- NocoDB vs Budibase
- NocoDB vs Fibery
- NocoDB vs Apache Superset
- NocoDB vs Coefficient
- NocoDB vs Cube Software
- NocoDB vs Quadratic
- NocoDB vs Rowy
