Automation Integration · head to head
Kogito vs Tray.io

Kogito
Automation Integration
Cloud-native business automation for Quarkus, now an Apache KIE component
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Kogito kogito is a developer framework, not a product, so there is no equivalent of Camunda Operate for business users and any process monitoring interface has to be built or bought separately.; Tray.io now rebranded Tray.ai; pricing page names three tiers, Pro (3 workspaces, 7 day insights), Team (20 workspaces, 30 day insights) and Enterprise (unlimited workspaces, 180 day insights, SSO, HIPAA), but publishes no figures and requires a demo or sales call for a quote
- They diverge on capability: Kogito covers Build-time code generation, Tray.io covers Low-code workflow builder.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Kogito and Tray.io actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Automation Integration).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Kogito
- Build-time code generation
- Quarkus and Spring Boot support
- DMN decision services
- Drools rules engine
- Serverless workflow
- Kubernetes operator
Only in Tray.io
- Low-code workflow builder
- API integrations
- Webhooks
- Conditional logic
- Error handling
- Rate limiting
- Data transformation
- Authentication
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Kogito
- A Quarkus microservice that must expose a DMN decision model as a REST endpoint with millisecond start-upnot Tray.io
- Serverless deployment of business rules where a traditional BPM server would be far too heavynot Tray.io
- A Red Hat shop that wants the upstream of Red Hat process automation with the option of a supported build laternot Tray.io
- Replacing hand-coded conditional logic with DMN tables that business analysts can review and amendnot Tray.io
Tray.io
- Workflow Automationnot Kogito
- Data Integrationnot Kogito
- Process Automationnot Kogito
- App Integrationnot Kogito
- API Connectivitynot Kogito
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Kogito
- Kogito is a developer framework, not a product, so there is no equivalent of Camunda Operate for business users and any process monitoring interface has to be built or bought separately.
- Long-running stateful processes need external persistence and messaging that you configure and operate yourself, which removes much of the convenience a BPM server normally provides.
- It sits inside the Apache KIE incubator, and incubating status means graduation is not guaranteed and the project name and artefact coordinates have already changed once.
- Red Hat is by far the dominant contributor despite ASF stewardship, so the roadmap follows Red Hat product priorities rather than community demand.
- Documentation is spread across legacy JBoss sites, the old Kogito site and the new Apache KIE site, and search results routinely land on outdated versions, which costs real time during adoption.
Tray.io
- Now rebranded Tray.ai; pricing page names three tiers, Pro (3 workspaces, 7 day insights), Team (20 workspaces, 30 day insights) and Enterprise (unlimited workspaces, 180 day insights, SSO, HIPAA), but publishes no figures and requires a demo or sales call for a quote
Pricing, plan by plan
Kogito
Free- KogitoFree
- Apache 2.0 licence
- Apache KIE incubating project
- No usage limits
Tray.io
Free- Starter$50/month
- 20 workflows
- 50 integrations
- Community support
- Professional$150/month
- Unlimited workflows
- 500+ integrations
- Email support
- Enterprise$500/month
- Custom workflows
- Dedicated support
- Advanced security
Which should you pick?
Choose Kogito if
- You need build-time code generation.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, Docker, Kubernetes.
- You also want quarkus and spring boot support.
Choose Tray.io if
- You need low-code workflow builder.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Api.
- You also want api integrations.
Questions people ask
- Is Kogito or Tray.io better?
- Neither clearly leads. Kogito starts at Free and Tray.io at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Kogito or Tray.io?
- Kogito starts at Free and Tray.io at Free.
- Does Kogito or Tray.io run on more platforms?
- Kogito runs on Linux, Docker, Kubernetes. Tray.io runs on Web, Api.
- Can I use Kogito for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Kogito best used for?
- Kogito is most often used for a quarkus microservice that must expose a dmn decision model as a rest endpoint with millisecond start-up, serverless deployment of business rules where a traditional bpm server would be far too heavy, a red hat shop that wants the upstream of red hat process automation with the option of a supported build later, replacing hand-coded conditional logic with dmn tables that business analysts can review and amend. Of those, a quarkus microservice that must expose a dmn decision model as a rest endpoint with millisecond start-up and serverless deployment of business rules where a traditional bpm server would be far too heavy are not what Tray.io is typically brought in for.
- What can Kogito do that Tray.io cannot?
- Kogito covers Build-time code generation, Quarkus and Spring Boot support, DMN decision services, Drools rules engine. Tray.io covers Low-code workflow builder, API integrations, Webhooks, Conditional logic.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Kogito: Is Kogito still maintained?
Yes. It is an Apache KIE incubating project with active commits, with Red Hat as the dominant contributor.
Kogito: How does it differ from jBPM?
Kogito compiles process and rule definitions into application code at build time; jBPM was a runtime engine that loads definitions.
Kogito: Does it need Quarkus?
It is designed for Quarkus and supports Spring Boot; both are Java frameworks rather than a standalone server.
Kogito: Is there commercial support?
Not from Apache. Red Hat sells supported builds of this lineage as part of its subscriptions.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Kogito vs n8n
- Kogito vs Temporal
- Kogito vs Flowable
- Kogito vs Camunda
- Kogito vs Activiti
- Kogito vs Decodable
- Kogito vs Zapier
- Kogito vs Dagster
- Kogito vs Blue Prism
- Kogito vs CrewAI
- Kogito vs Mage AI
- Kogito vs Nintex
- Kogito vs Stitch
- Kogito vs Talend
- Kogito vs Tealium
- Kogito vs Tines
- Kogito vs Trigger.dev
- Kogito vs Xano
- Kogito vs Microsoft Power Automate
- Kogito vs MuleSoft
- Kogito vs Cyclr
- Kogito vs Celigo
- Kogito vs Boomi
- Kogito vs Workato
- Kogito vs Automation Anywhere
- Kogito vs Paragon
- Kogito vs Hightouch
- Kogito vs Jitterbit
- Kogito vs Nango
- Kogito vs Pipedream
- Kogito vs Windmill
- Tray.io vs n8n
- Tray.io vs Temporal
- Tray.io vs Flowable
- Tray.io vs Camunda
- Tray.io vs Activiti
- Tray.io vs Decodable
- Tray.io vs Zapier
- Tray.io vs Dagster
- Tray.io vs Blue Prism
- Tray.io vs CrewAI
- Tray.io vs Mage AI
- Tray.io vs Nintex
- Tray.io vs Stitch
- Tray.io vs Talend
- Tray.io vs Tealium
- Tray.io vs Tines
- Tray.io vs Trigger.dev
- Tray.io vs Xano
- Tray.io vs Microsoft Power Automate
- Tray.io vs MuleSoft
- Tray.io vs Cyclr
- Tray.io vs Celigo
- Tray.io vs Boomi
- Tray.io vs Workato
- Tray.io vs Automation Anywhere
- Tray.io vs Paragon
- Tray.io vs Hightouch
- Tray.io vs Jitterbit
- Tray.io vs Nango
- Tray.io vs Pipedream
- Tray.io vs Windmill

