Developer Tools · head to head
Keycloak vs Stytch

Keycloak
Developer Tools
Open-source identity and access management server.
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes

Stytch
Cybersecurity
Identity platform with passwordless auth, passkeys and bot detection.
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Keycloak requires self-hosted deployment and operational expertise to install, configure and maintain; Stytch free tier limited to 10,000 monthly active users; scaling beyond this requires custom pricing negotiation
- Prices and features above were last checked on 29 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Keycloak and Stytch actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Keycloak
- Organisations requiring self-hosted identity infrastructure for compliance or data residencynot Stytch
- Companies with existing LDAP/Active Directory systems needing federated authenticationnot Stytch
- Open-source projects and communities requiring free IAM without licensing costsnot Stytch
- Enterprises building custom identity workflows requiring fine-grained authorisationnot Stytch
- Teams with sufficient operational expertise to manage infrastructurenot Stytch
Stytch
- Applications prioritising passwordless and passkey authenticationnot Keycloak
- SaaS platforms requiring AI agent authentication and machine-to-machine flowsnot Keycloak
- Companies with emerging identity needs such as bot detection and device intelligencenot Keycloak
- Organisations building with Next.js and React requiring modern auth patternsnot Keycloak
- Applications needing transparent pricing without surprise tiers or feature gatingnot Keycloak
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Keycloak
- Requires self-hosted deployment and operational expertise to install, configure and maintain
- No managed cloud option provided by Red Hat; organisations must operate infrastructure themselves or use third-party distributions
- Clustering and high-availability configurations require additional operational knowledge
- Community support only; commercial support requires third-party vendors or distributions
Stytch
- Free tier limited to 10,000 monthly active users; scaling beyond this requires custom pricing negotiation
- Fraud prevention capabilities billed at $0.005 per fingerprint for usage exceeding 10,000 free checks
- Additional SSO or SCIM connections beyond the 5 included in free tier cost $125 each
- Brand customisation and email removal require one-time payment of $99
- HIPAA and advanced fraud protection only available in Enterprise tier
- No native UI builder; requires custom frontend development for fully-branded auth flows
Pricing, plan by plan
Keycloak
Free- Open-sourceFree
- Full platform functionality
- Self-hosted deployment
- Community support
Stytch
Free- FreeFree
- 10,000 monthly active users and AI agents
- Unlimited organisations
- 5 SSO or SCIM connections
- Scaled$undefined/variable
- Usage-based pricing for users exceeding 10,000
- All free tier features
- Volume discounts available
- Enterprise$undefined/variable
- Custom pricing
- Discounted volume rates
- Enterprise support SLA
Which should you pick?
Choose Keycloak if
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Self-hosted, Docker, Kubernetes, Linux, Windows, API.
Questions people ask
- Is Keycloak or Stytch better?
- Neither clearly leads. Keycloak starts at Free and Stytch at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Keycloak or Stytch?
- Keycloak starts at Free and Stytch at Free.
- Does Keycloak or Stytch run on more platforms?
- Keycloak runs on Self-hosted, Docker, Kubernetes, Linux, Windows, API. Stytch runs on Web, API.
- Can I use Keycloak for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Keycloak best used for?
- Keycloak is most often used for organisations requiring self-hosted identity infrastructure for compliance or data residency, companies with existing ldap/active directory systems needing federated authentication, open-source projects and communities requiring free iam without licensing costs, enterprises building custom identity workflows requiring fine-grained authorisation. Of those, organisations requiring self-hosted identity infrastructure for compliance or data residency and companies with existing ldap/active directory systems needing federated authentication are not what Stytch is typically brought in for.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Keycloak: What protocols does Keycloak support?
Keycloak supports OpenID Connect, OAuth 2.0 and SAML 2.0 protocols for authentication and authorisation.
SourceStytch: What is included in Stytch's free tier?
The free tier includes 10,000 monthly active users (human and AI agents), unlimited organisations, 5 SSO or SCIM connections, and 1,000 machine-to-machine tokens with full authentication features.
SourceKeycloak: Can Keycloak integrate with existing user directories?
Yes. Keycloak supports user federation with LDAP and Active Directory systems, allowing organisations to leverage existing user directories.
SourceStytch: Does Stytch support AI agent authentication?
Yes. Stytch provides native AI agent authentication and authorisation, with support for the Model Context Protocol (MCP) for authenticating AI agents accessing external systems.
SourceKeycloak: Is Keycloak free?
Yes. Keycloak is fully open-source and free to deploy and use. No licensing fees are required.
SourceStytch: What fraud prevention features does Stytch offer?
Stytch includes bot detection with 99.99% accuracy, device fingerprinting, invisible CAPTCHA, and zero-day device intelligence built into all tiers.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- Keycloak vs Penpot
- Keycloak vs Soketi
- Keycloak vs Ansible
- Keycloak vs Atlantis
- Keycloak vs Vite
- Keycloak vs Depot
- Keycloak vs Pants Build
- Keycloak vs Buildkite
- Keycloak vs Coder
- Keycloak vs Jitsu
- Keycloak vs Bitbucket
- Keycloak vs Sweep
- Keycloak vs Azure DevOps
- Keycloak vs Backstage
- Keycloak vs Claude Code
- Keycloak vs Cloud Native Buildpacks
- Keycloak vs Cody
- Keycloak vs Bitdefender Total Security
- Keycloak vs 1Password
- Keycloak vs Norton 360
- Keycloak vs LastPass
- Keycloak vs Cisco Duo
- Keycloak vs Transmit Security
- Keycloak vs Descope
- Keycloak vs Authy
- Keycloak vs Entrust Identity as a Service
- Keycloak vs VMware Carbon Black
- Keycloak vs Feedzai
- Keycloak vs NICE Actimize
- Keycloak vs Salient CompleteView
- Keycloak vs Sumsub
- Keycloak vs Tuta
- Keycloak vs Camio
- Keycloak vs Clerk
- Stytch vs Penpot
- Stytch vs Soketi
- Stytch vs Ansible
- Stytch vs Atlantis
- Stytch vs Vite
- Stytch vs Depot
- Stytch vs Pants Build
- Stytch vs Buildkite
- Stytch vs Coder
- Stytch vs Jitsu
- Stytch vs Bitbucket
- Stytch vs Sweep
- Stytch vs Azure DevOps
- Stytch vs Backstage
- Stytch vs Claude Code
- Stytch vs Cloud Native Buildpacks
- Stytch vs Cody
- Stytch vs Bitdefender Total Security
- Stytch vs 1Password
- Stytch vs Norton 360
- Stytch vs LastPass
- Stytch vs Cisco Duo
- Stytch vs Transmit Security
- Stytch vs Descope
- Stytch vs Authy
- Stytch vs Entrust Identity as a Service
- Stytch vs VMware Carbon Black
- Stytch vs Feedzai
- Stytch vs NICE Actimize
- Stytch vs Salient CompleteView
- Stytch vs Sumsub
- Stytch vs Tuta
- Stytch vs Camio
- Stytch vs Clerk
