Developer Tools · head to head
Keycloak vs March Networks

Keycloak
Developer Tools
Open-source identity and access management server.
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes

March Networks
Cybersecurity
Banking and retail video with transaction overlay, sold by a Canadian firm that changed from Chinese to Taiwanese ownership
- From
- On request
- Free plan
- No
The short version
- Only Keycloak has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Keycloak requires self-hosted deployment and operational expertise to install, configure and maintain; March Networks the ownership history is a live compliance question: Chinese-owned via Infinova from 2011, with a PRC government entity as controlling shareholder by January 2020, before the December 2021 sale to Delta Electronics of Taiwan, and any US federal or contractor buyer should expect to document that chain during a procurement review.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Keycloak and March Networks actually diverge.
| Attribute | Keycloak | March Networks |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | Free | On request |
| Pricing model | open-source | quote |
| Free tier | Yes | No |
| Platforms | Self-hosted, Docker, Kubernetes, Linux, Windows, API | Windows, Web, iOS, Android |
| Category | Developer Tools | Cybersecurity |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Keycloak
Nothing recorded that March Networks does not also cover.
Only in March Networks
- Command Enterprise
- Searchlight
- Hybrid recording
- X-Series hybrid NVRs
- Health monitoring
- ATM and teller integration
- Retail loss prevention analytics
- Evidence export
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Keycloak
- Organisations requiring self-hosted identity infrastructure for compliance or data residencynot March Networks
- Companies with existing LDAP/Active Directory systems needing federated authenticationnot March Networks
- Open-source projects and communities requiring free IAM without licensing costsnot March Networks
- Enterprises building custom identity workflows requiring fine-grained authorisationnot March Networks
- Teams with sufficient operational expertise to manage infrastructurenot March Networks
March Networks
- A bank investigating a disputed ATM withdrawal who needs the clip for that transaction, not two hours of timelinenot Keycloak
- A credit union refreshing 200 branches in phases where analogue and IP cameras must coexist on one recordernot Keycloak
- A restaurant chain overlaying till exceptions on video across hundreds of locationsnot Keycloak
- A transit operator needing video retrieval from vehicles and stations without shipping terabytes over the networknot Keycloak
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Keycloak
- Requires self-hosted deployment and operational expertise to install, configure and maintain
- No managed cloud option provided by Red Hat; organisations must operate infrastructure themselves or use third-party distributions
- Clustering and high-availability configurations require additional operational knowledge
- Community support only; commercial support requires third-party vendors or distributions
March Networks
- The ownership history is a live compliance question: Chinese-owned via Infinova from 2011, with a PRC government entity as controlling shareholder by January 2020, before the December 2021 sale to Delta Electronics of Taiwan, and any US federal or contractor buyer should expect to document that chain during a procurement review.
- NDAA compliance is stated at the product level and rests on American system-on-chip processors in the majority of cameras and in specific recorder lines, which means it must be confirmed per model rather than assumed across the catalogue.
- The platform is engineered around banking and retail workflows, so buyers outside those verticals pay for transaction integration they will never use and get a less developed general security experience than from a Genetec or Milestone.
- No pricing is published and everything is quoted through integrators, so a multi-hundred-site estate cannot be budgeted without a design exercise and there is no benchmark against which to test a quote.
- Hybrid recording means a recorder in every branch, which is hardware to install, monitor, service and eventually replace at every location, and that refresh cycle is a recurring capital event that cloud rivals avoid entirely.
Pricing, plan by plan
Keycloak
Free- Open-sourceFree
- Full platform functionality
- Self-hosted deployment
- Community support
March Networks
On request- Command Enterprise and Searchlight$undefined/year
- Per-recorder and per-channel licensing quoted through integrators
- Searchlight business intelligence licensed separately
- X-Series hybrid recorders purchased per site
Which should you pick?
Choose Keycloak if
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Self-hosted, Docker, Kubernetes, Linux, Windows, API.
Choose March Networks if
- You need command enterprise.
- You work on Windows, Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want searchlight.
Questions people ask
- Is Keycloak or March Networks better?
- Neither clearly leads. Keycloak starts at Free and March Networks at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Keycloak or March Networks?
- Keycloak has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for Keycloak and On request for March Networks.
- Does Keycloak or March Networks run on more platforms?
- Keycloak runs on Self-hosted, Docker, Kubernetes, Linux, Windows, API. March Networks runs on Windows, Web, iOS, Android.
- Can I use Keycloak for free?
- Yes. Keycloak has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. March Networks starts at On request.
- What is Keycloak best used for?
- Keycloak is most often used for organisations requiring self-hosted identity infrastructure for compliance or data residency, companies with existing ldap/active directory systems needing federated authentication, open-source projects and communities requiring free iam without licensing costs, enterprises building custom identity workflows requiring fine-grained authorisation. Of those, organisations requiring self-hosted identity infrastructure for compliance or data residency and companies with existing ldap/active directory systems needing federated authentication are not what March Networks is typically brought in for.
- What can Keycloak do that March Networks cannot?
- March Networks covers Command Enterprise, Searchlight, Hybrid recording, X-Series hybrid NVRs.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Keycloak: What protocols does Keycloak support?
Keycloak supports OpenID Connect, OAuth 2.0 and SAML 2.0 protocols for authentication and authorisation.
SourceMarch Networks: Who owns March Networks?
Delta Electronics of Taiwan, which acquired it in December 2021 for 114 million US dollars. Before that it was owned by Chinese manufacturer Infinova, which by January 2020 had a PRC government entity as controlling shareholder.
Keycloak: Can Keycloak integrate with existing user directories?
Yes. Keycloak supports user federation with LDAP and Active Directory systems, allowing organisations to leverage existing user directories.
SourceMarch Networks: Is March Networks NDAA compliant?
The company states it is, citing American system-on-chip processors in the majority of its cameras and in its Command Recording Server bundles and X-Series hybrid NVRs. Verify per model, and expect the ownership history to be raised in a federal procurement review.
Keycloak: Is Keycloak free?
Yes. Keycloak is fully open-source and free to deploy and use. No licensing fees are required.
SourceMarch Networks: What is Searchlight?
The layer that overlays ATM, teller and point of sale transaction data on video so investigators search by transaction rather than by time.
March Networks: Is video stored in the cloud?
No, it is hybrid. Video is recorded on a recorder at each site and only required clips move centrally, which is why it suits large branch estates on modest connections.
Related pages
More on March Networks
Other head to heads
- Keycloak vs Penpot
- Keycloak vs Soketi
- Keycloak vs Ansible
- Keycloak vs Atlantis
- Keycloak vs Vite
- Keycloak vs Depot
- Keycloak vs Pants Build
- Keycloak vs Buildkite
- Keycloak vs Coder
- Keycloak vs Jitsu
- Keycloak vs Bitbucket
- Keycloak vs Sweep
- Keycloak vs Azure DevOps
- Keycloak vs Backstage
- Keycloak vs Claude Code
- Keycloak vs Cloud Native Buildpacks
- Keycloak vs Cody
- Keycloak vs Envysion
- Keycloak vs Eagle Eye Networks
- Keycloak vs Dahua Technology
- Keycloak vs Genetec Security Center
- Keycloak vs DTiQ
- Keycloak vs VIVOTEK VAST Security Station
- Keycloak vs Salient CompleteView
- Keycloak vs Hanwha Vision
- Keycloak vs Milestone XProtect
- Keycloak vs Camio
- Keycloak vs Rhombus Systems
- Keycloak vs ExpressVPN
- Keycloak vs Fortinet FortiGate
- Keycloak vs HID Global
- Keycloak vs IBM QRadar
- Keycloak vs Jamf Pro
- Keycloak vs Keeper Password Manager
- Keycloak vs Keygen
- March Networks vs Penpot
- March Networks vs Soketi
- March Networks vs Ansible
- March Networks vs Atlantis
- March Networks vs Vite
- March Networks vs Depot
- March Networks vs Pants Build
- March Networks vs Buildkite
- March Networks vs Coder
- March Networks vs Jitsu
- March Networks vs Bitbucket
- March Networks vs Sweep
- March Networks vs Azure DevOps
- March Networks vs Backstage
- March Networks vs Claude Code
- March Networks vs Cloud Native Buildpacks
- March Networks vs Cody
- March Networks vs Envysion
- March Networks vs Eagle Eye Networks
- March Networks vs Dahua Technology
- March Networks vs Genetec Security Center
- March Networks vs DTiQ
- March Networks vs VIVOTEK VAST Security Station
- March Networks vs Salient CompleteView
- March Networks vs Hanwha Vision
- March Networks vs Milestone XProtect
- March Networks vs Camio
- March Networks vs Rhombus Systems
- March Networks vs ExpressVPN
- March Networks vs Fortinet FortiGate
- March Networks vs HID Global
- March Networks vs IBM QRadar
- March Networks vs Jamf Pro
- March Networks vs Keeper Password Manager
- March Networks vs Keygen
