Developer Tools · head to head
Atlantis vs March Networks

Atlantis
Developer Tools
Runs Terraform plan and apply from pull request comments, self-hosted and free
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes

March Networks
Cybersecurity
Banking and retail video with transaction overlay, sold by a Canadian firm that changed from Chinese to Taiwanese ownership
- From
- On request
- Free plan
- No
The short version
- Only Atlantis has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Atlantis there is no company, no service level agreement and no paid support at any price, and the six maintainers are volunteers with day jobs, which some risk committees will not accept for a component holding production cloud credentials.; March Networks the ownership history is a live compliance question: Chinese-owned via Infinova from 2011, with a PRC government entity as controlling shareholder by January 2020, before the December 2021 sale to Delta Electronics of Taiwan, and any US federal or contractor buyer should expect to document that chain during a procurement review.
- They diverge on capability: Atlantis covers Pull request plans, March Networks covers Command Enterprise.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Atlantis and March Networks actually diverge.
| Attribute | Atlantis | March Networks |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | Free | On request |
| Pricing model | Open source, no licence fee | quote |
| Free tier | Yes | No |
| Platforms | Linux, Docker, Kubernetes, Self-hosted | Windows, Web, iOS, Android |
| Category | Developer Tools | Cybersecurity |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Atlantis
- Pull request plans
- Comment driven apply
- Workspace locking
- Policy checking
- Multi-platform webhooks
- Custom workflows
Only in March Networks
- Command Enterprise
- Searchlight
- Hybrid recording
- X-Series hybrid NVRs
- Health monitoring
- ATM and teller integration
- Retail loss prevention analytics
- Evidence export
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Atlantis
- Making Terraform review meaningful by putting the actual plan output in front of the approvernot March Networks
- Removing local applies and the credential sprawl that comes with every engineer holding production keysnot March Networks
- Getting pull request driven infrastructure without paying a per-user subscription for a hosted platformnot March Networks
- Enforcing Conftest policies as a blocking check before an apply can runnot March Networks
March Networks
- A bank investigating a disputed ATM withdrawal who needs the clip for that transaction, not two hours of timelinenot Atlantis
- A credit union refreshing 200 branches in phases where analogue and IP cameras must coexist on one recordernot Atlantis
- A restaurant chain overlaying till exceptions on video across hundreds of locationsnot Atlantis
- A transit operator needing video retrieval from vehicles and stations without shipping terabytes over the networknot Atlantis
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Atlantis
- There is no company, no service level agreement and no paid support at any price, and the six maintainers are volunteers with day jobs, which some risk committees will not accept for a component holding production cloud credentials.
- The security surface is inherently sharp, because it is an internet-reachable webhook endpoint that executes applies with privileged credentials, gated by pull request comment authorisation that is coarse next to a real policy engine.
- It is stateful, holding a working directory and lock database on local disk, so high availability and horizontal scaling are awkward and you own upgrades, webhook plumbing, secret rotation and the host itself.
- It lacks the features that distinguish the commercial alternatives, with no native drift detection, no cost estimation, no managed state interface and no policy engine beyond the Conftest integration.
- Terragrunt and monorepo layouts are not first-class, requiring hand-written custom workflows and repository configuration that becomes a growing maintenance burden as the number of repositories increases.
March Networks
- The ownership history is a live compliance question: Chinese-owned via Infinova from 2011, with a PRC government entity as controlling shareholder by January 2020, before the December 2021 sale to Delta Electronics of Taiwan, and any US federal or contractor buyer should expect to document that chain during a procurement review.
- NDAA compliance is stated at the product level and rests on American system-on-chip processors in the majority of cameras and in specific recorder lines, which means it must be confirmed per model rather than assumed across the catalogue.
- The platform is engineered around banking and retail workflows, so buyers outside those verticals pay for transaction integration they will never use and get a less developed general security experience than from a Genetec or Milestone.
- No pricing is published and everything is quoted through integrators, so a multi-hundred-site estate cannot be budgeted without a design exercise and there is no benchmark against which to test a quote.
- Hybrid recording means a recorder in every branch, which is hardware to install, monitor, service and eventually replace at every location, and that refresh cycle is a recurring capital event that cloud rivals avoid entirely.
Pricing, plan by plan
Atlantis
Free- AtlantisFree
- Apache-2.0, no usage limits and no seat count
- No commercial edition and no paid support tier
- Community support through GitHub and the CNCF Slack channel
March Networks
On request- Command Enterprise and Searchlight$undefined/year
- Per-recorder and per-channel licensing quoted through integrators
- Searchlight business intelligence licensed separately
- X-Series hybrid recorders purchased per site
Which should you pick?
Choose Atlantis if
- You need pull request plans.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, Docker, Kubernetes, Self-hosted.
- You also want comment driven apply.
Choose March Networks if
- You need command enterprise.
- You work on Windows, Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want searchlight.
Questions people ask
- Is Atlantis or March Networks better?
- Neither clearly leads. Atlantis starts at Free and March Networks at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Atlantis or March Networks?
- Atlantis has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for Atlantis and On request for March Networks.
- Does Atlantis or March Networks run on more platforms?
- Atlantis runs on Linux, Docker, Kubernetes, Self-hosted. March Networks runs on Windows, Web, iOS, Android.
- Can I use Atlantis for free?
- Yes. Atlantis has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. March Networks starts at On request.
- What is Atlantis best used for?
- Atlantis is most often used for making terraform review meaningful by putting the actual plan output in front of the approver, removing local applies and the credential sprawl that comes with every engineer holding production keys, getting pull request driven infrastructure without paying a per-user subscription for a hosted platform, enforcing conftest policies as a blocking check before an apply can run. Of those, making terraform review meaningful by putting the actual plan output in front of the approver and removing local applies and the credential sprawl that comes with every engineer holding production keys are not what March Networks is typically brought in for.
- What can Atlantis do that March Networks cannot?
- Atlantis covers Pull request plans, Comment driven apply, Workspace locking, Policy checking. March Networks covers Command Enterprise, Searchlight, Hybrid recording, X-Series hybrid NVRs.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Atlantis: Is there a company behind Atlantis?
No. It runs as a series of LF Projects under the Linux Foundation and is maintained by volunteers. There is no vendor to buy support from and no service level agreement.
March Networks: Who owns March Networks?
Delta Electronics of Taiwan, which acquired it in December 2021 for 114 million US dollars. Before that it was owned by Chinese manufacturer Infinova, which by January 2020 had a PRC government entity as controlling shareholder.
Atlantis: Is it a CNCF project?
No. It uses a channel in the CNCF Slack, which is often misread as membership, but the project sits under LF Projects rather than the CNCF.
March Networks: Is March Networks NDAA compliant?
The company states it is, citing American system-on-chip processors in the majority of its cameras and in its Command Recording Server bundles and X-Series hybrid NVRs. Verify per model, and expect the ownership history to be raised in a federal procurement review.
Atlantis: Does it work with OpenTofu?
Yes, there is a dedicated integration guide alongside Terraform, and it also has configuration for working with hosted Terraform backends.
March Networks: What is Searchlight?
The layer that overlays ATM, teller and point of sale transaction data on video so investigators search by transaction rather than by time.
Atlantis: What does it not do that a paid platform does?
Drift detection, cost estimation, a managed state and run interface, and a real policy engine. Atlantis does pull request plan and apply well and stops there.
March Networks: Is video stored in the cloud?
No, it is hybrid. Video is recorded on a recorder at each site and only required clips move centrally, which is why it suits large branch estates on modest connections.
Related pages
More on March Networks
Other head to heads
- Atlantis vs Spacelift
- Atlantis vs HCP Terraform
- Atlantis vs Harness
- Atlantis vs Jitsu
- Atlantis vs Visual Studio Code
- Atlantis vs Tilt
- Atlantis vs Soketi
- Atlantis vs Pants Build
- Atlantis vs Steampipe
- Atlantis vs Refact
- Atlantis vs Penpot
- Atlantis vs GNU Emacs
- Atlantis vs JFrog Artifactory
- Atlantis vs Namespace
- Atlantis vs Nix
- Atlantis vs Nixpacks
- Atlantis vs Octopus Deploy
- Atlantis vs Okteto
- Atlantis vs Envysion
- Atlantis vs Eagle Eye Networks
- Atlantis vs Dahua Technology
- Atlantis vs Genetec Security Center
- Atlantis vs DTiQ
- Atlantis vs VIVOTEK VAST Security Station
- Atlantis vs Salient CompleteView
- Atlantis vs Hanwha Vision
- Atlantis vs Milestone XProtect
- Atlantis vs Camio
- Atlantis vs Rhombus Systems
- Atlantis vs ExpressVPN
- Atlantis vs Fortinet FortiGate
- Atlantis vs HID Global
- Atlantis vs IBM QRadar
- Atlantis vs Jamf Pro
- Atlantis vs Keeper Password Manager
- Atlantis vs Keygen
- March Networks vs Spacelift
- March Networks vs HCP Terraform
- March Networks vs Harness
- March Networks vs Jitsu
- March Networks vs Visual Studio Code
- March Networks vs Tilt
- March Networks vs Soketi
- March Networks vs Pants Build
- March Networks vs Steampipe
- March Networks vs Refact
- March Networks vs Penpot
- March Networks vs GNU Emacs
- March Networks vs JFrog Artifactory
- March Networks vs Namespace
- March Networks vs Nix
- March Networks vs Nixpacks
- March Networks vs Octopus Deploy
- March Networks vs Okteto
- March Networks vs Envysion
- March Networks vs Eagle Eye Networks
- March Networks vs Dahua Technology
- March Networks vs Genetec Security Center
- March Networks vs DTiQ
- March Networks vs VIVOTEK VAST Security Station
- March Networks vs Salient CompleteView
- March Networks vs Hanwha Vision
- March Networks vs Milestone XProtect
- March Networks vs Camio
- March Networks vs Rhombus Systems
- March Networks vs ExpressVPN
- March Networks vs Fortinet FortiGate
- March Networks vs HID Global
- March Networks vs IBM QRadar
- March Networks vs Jamf Pro
- March Networks vs Keeper Password Manager
- March Networks vs Keygen
