Developer Tools · head to head
Cody vs March Networks

March Networks
Cybersecurity
Banking and retail video with transaction overlay, sold by a Canadian firm that changed from Chinese to Taiwanese ownership
- From
- On request
- Free plan
- No
The short version
- Only Cody has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Cody sourcegraph now publishes a single Enterprise plan starting at $16K, with no free or individual Pro tier listed on the pricing page; March Networks the ownership history is a live compliance question: Chinese-owned via Infinova from 2011, with a PRC government entity as controlling shareholder by January 2020, before the December 2021 sale to Delta Electronics of Taiwan, and any US federal or contractor buyer should expect to document that chain during a procurement review.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Cody and March Networks actually diverge.
| Attribute | Cody | March Networks |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | Free | On request |
| Pricing model | freemium | quote |
| Free tier | Yes | No |
| Platforms | Web | Windows, Web, iOS, Android |
| Category | Developer Tools | Cybersecurity |
| Founded | 2013 | Unknown |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Cody
Nothing recorded that March Networks does not also cover.
Only in March Networks
- Command Enterprise
- Searchlight
- Hybrid recording
- X-Series hybrid NVRs
- Health monitoring
- ATM and teller integration
- Retail loss prevention analytics
- Evidence export
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Cody
- Code completion and intelligent autocomplete in IDEsnot March Networks
- Developer chat with codebase context awarenessnot March Networks
- Automated debugging and error identificationnot March Networks
- Customizable prompts for workflow automationnot March Networks
March Networks
- A bank investigating a disputed ATM withdrawal who needs the clip for that transaction, not two hours of timelinenot Cody
- A credit union refreshing 200 branches in phases where analogue and IP cameras must coexist on one recordernot Cody
- A restaurant chain overlaying till exceptions on video across hundreds of locationsnot Cody
- A transit operator needing video retrieval from vehicles and stations without shipping terabytes over the networknot Cody
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Cody
- Sourcegraph now publishes a single Enterprise plan starting at $16K, with no free or individual Pro tier listed on the pricing page
- sourcegraph.com/cody redirects to the documentation rather than a Cody product or pricing page
- AI features are metered as credits included per user, and exceeding the allocation requires buying a higher volume bucket
- Volume credit buckets are sold as an add-on rather than included
- A customer success manager and premium support are optional paid extras on top of the Enterprise plan
- Standard support is 24x5 rather than 24x7, with round-the-clock coverage sold as an upgrade
- The published $16K figure is a starting price that scales with team size, so the actual cost is quoted rather than listed
March Networks
- The ownership history is a live compliance question: Chinese-owned via Infinova from 2011, with a PRC government entity as controlling shareholder by January 2020, before the December 2021 sale to Delta Electronics of Taiwan, and any US federal or contractor buyer should expect to document that chain during a procurement review.
- NDAA compliance is stated at the product level and rests on American system-on-chip processors in the majority of cameras and in specific recorder lines, which means it must be confirmed per model rather than assumed across the catalogue.
- The platform is engineered around banking and retail workflows, so buyers outside those verticals pay for transaction integration they will never use and get a less developed general security experience than from a Genetec or Milestone.
- No pricing is published and everything is quoted through integrators, so a multi-hundred-site estate cannot be budgeted without a design exercise and there is no benchmark against which to test a quote.
- Hybrid recording means a recorder in every branch, which is hardware to install, monitor, service and eventually replace at every location, and that refresh cycle is a recurring capital event that cloud rivals avoid entirely.
Pricing, plan by plan
Cody
FreeNo published plan breakdown. See the Cody review.
March Networks
On request- Command Enterprise and Searchlight$undefined/year
- Per-recorder and per-channel licensing quoted through integrators
- Searchlight business intelligence licensed separately
- X-Series hybrid recorders purchased per site
Which should you pick?
Choose March Networks if
- You need command enterprise.
- You work on Windows, Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want searchlight.
Questions people ask
- Is Cody or March Networks better?
- Neither clearly leads. Cody starts at Free and March Networks at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Cody or March Networks?
- Cody has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for Cody and On request for March Networks.
- Does Cody or March Networks run on more platforms?
- Cody runs on Web. March Networks runs on Windows, Web, iOS, Android.
- Can I use Cody for free?
- Yes. Cody has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. March Networks starts at On request.
- What is Cody best used for?
- Cody is most often used for code completion and intelligent autocomplete in ides, developer chat with codebase context awareness, automated debugging and error identification, customizable prompts for workflow automation. Of those, code completion and intelligent autocomplete in ides and developer chat with codebase context awareness are not what March Networks is typically brought in for.
- What can Cody do that March Networks cannot?
- March Networks covers Command Enterprise, Searchlight, Hybrid recording, X-Series hybrid NVRs.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Cody: Is Cody free?
Cody offers a free tier for individual developers via VS Code, JetBrains, Visual Studio, and the web app. Unlimited free usage is available for solo developers.
SourceMarch Networks: Who owns March Networks?
Delta Electronics of Taiwan, which acquired it in December 2021 for 114 million US dollars. Before that it was owned by Chinese manufacturer Infinova, which by January 2020 had a PRC government entity as controlling shareholder.
Cody: What does Cody Enterprise cost?
Cody Enterprise pricing is custom and requires contacting Sourcegraph sales. It is available for Sourcegraph Enterprise customers and must be quoted based on your deployment and usage needs.
SourceMarch Networks: Is March Networks NDAA compliant?
The company states it is, citing American system-on-chip processors in the majority of its cameras and in its Command Recording Server bundles and X-Series hybrid NVRs. Verify per model, and expect the ownership history to be raised in a federal procurement review.
Cody: What LLMs does Cody use?
Cody uses the latest large language models for code completions, chat, and debugging. It leverages Sourcegraph's advanced Search API to pull codebase context from local and remote repositories.
SourceMarch Networks: What is Searchlight?
The layer that overlays ATM, teller and point of sale transaction data on video so investigators search by transaction rather than by time.
March Networks: Is video stored in the cloud?
No, it is hybrid. Video is recorded on a recorder at each site and only required clips move centrally, which is why it suits large branch estates on modest connections.
Related pages
More on March Networks
Other head to heads
- Cody vs Turborepo
- Cody vs Visual Studio Code
- Cody vs ESLint
- Cody vs pnpm
- Cody vs Sourcegraph
- Cody vs Sweep
- Cody vs Deep Code
- Cody vs GitHub Copilot
- Cody vs Bazel
- Cody vs Fig
- Cody vs GoLand
- Cody vs Steampipe
- Cody vs Tilt
- Cody vs WarpBuild
- Cody vs Webpack
- Cody vs Avo
- Cody vs Azure DevOps
- Cody vs PhpStorm
- Cody vs Envysion
- Cody vs Eagle Eye Networks
- Cody vs Dahua Technology
- Cody vs Genetec Security Center
- Cody vs DTiQ
- Cody vs VIVOTEK VAST Security Station
- Cody vs Salient CompleteView
- Cody vs Hanwha Vision
- Cody vs Milestone XProtect
- Cody vs Camio
- Cody vs Rhombus Systems
- Cody vs ExpressVPN
- Cody vs Fortinet FortiGate
- Cody vs HID Global
- Cody vs IBM QRadar
- Cody vs Jamf Pro
- Cody vs Keeper Password Manager
- Cody vs Keygen
- March Networks vs Turborepo
- March Networks vs Visual Studio Code
- March Networks vs ESLint
- March Networks vs pnpm
- March Networks vs Sourcegraph
- March Networks vs Sweep
- March Networks vs Deep Code
- March Networks vs GitHub Copilot
- March Networks vs Bazel
- March Networks vs Fig
- March Networks vs GoLand
- March Networks vs Steampipe
- March Networks vs Tilt
- March Networks vs WarpBuild
- March Networks vs Webpack
- March Networks vs Avo
- March Networks vs Azure DevOps
- March Networks vs PhpStorm
- March Networks vs Envysion
- March Networks vs Eagle Eye Networks
- March Networks vs Dahua Technology
- March Networks vs Genetec Security Center
- March Networks vs DTiQ
- March Networks vs VIVOTEK VAST Security Station
- March Networks vs Salient CompleteView
- March Networks vs Hanwha Vision
- March Networks vs Milestone XProtect
- March Networks vs Camio
- March Networks vs Rhombus Systems
- March Networks vs ExpressVPN
- March Networks vs Fortinet FortiGate
- March Networks vs HID Global
- March Networks vs IBM QRadar
- March Networks vs Jamf Pro
- March Networks vs Keeper Password Manager
- March Networks vs Keygen

