Machine Learning · head to head
JMP vs SingleStore

JMP
Machine Learning
Desktop statistical and design of experiments software from a SAS subsidiary
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

SingleStore
Databases
The real-time distributed SQL database for data-intensive applications
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: JMP it is a desktop application holding the working table in memory, so a data set that outgrows the workstation has no in-place upgrade path, only a move to a different tool and a different skill set.; SingleStore high licensing costs that increase with data scale and cluster size
- They diverge on capability: JMP covers Custom design of experiments, SingleStore covers Real-time Analytics.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which JMP and SingleStore actually diverge.
| Attribute | JMP | SingleStore |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | subscription | Unknown |
| Platforms | Mac, Windows | Cloud (SingleStoreDB Cloud), Self-Managed |
| Category | Machine Learning | Databases |
| Founded | 1976 | 2011 |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in JMP
- Custom design of experiments
- Linked interactive graphics
- Analysis platforms
- Quality and process tools
- Graph Builder
- JSL scripting
- Scoring code export
- Predictive modelling in JMP Pro
Only in SingleStore
- Real-time Analytics
- Fast Data Ingest
- In-memory Processing
- Distributed Architecture
- MySQL Compatible
- Columnar Storage
- Vector Search
- Kafka
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
JMP
- Planning a physical experiment where each run is expensive, and the question is which twelve runs to perform rather than how to model data you already havenot SingleStore
- Process capability and control chart work in a manufacturing quality function that has to produce evidence for a customer or regulatornot SingleStore
- Exploratory analysis by an engineer or scientist who will not write code but needs more than a spreadsheetnot SingleStore
- Semiconductor, chemical and pharmaceutical development groups where JMP is already the shared language for reporting resultsnot SingleStore
SingleStore
- Transaction processingnot JMP
- Data storagenot JMP
- Application backendnot JMP
- Reportingnot JMP
- Data analyticsnot JMP
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
JMP
- It is a desktop application holding the working table in memory, so a data set that outgrows the workstation has no in-place upgrade path, only a move to a different tool and a different skill set.
- There is no Linux build and no server edition for running analyses, so JMP cannot sit in a scheduled pipeline the way an R or Python script can, and recurring reports depend on a named person running them on a laptop.
- The predictive modelling capability most buyers mean when they call this machine learning software is in JMP Pro, a separate and more expensive licence, so the base product's price is not the price of the thing being evaluated.
- JSL is proprietary to JMP, so the scripts, add-ins and automation a group accumulates over a decade do not port anywhere and become sunk cost the moment anyone questions the renewal.
- Deployment ends at exported scoring code with no registry, monitoring or retraining, so a model that runs in production is maintained by another team in another language and steadily diverges from the version the analyst still has open.
SingleStore
- High licensing costs that increase with data scale and cluster size
- Eventual consistency in replication: secondary replicas may lag during high write loads
- Complex operational setup requiring specialized knowledge for optimization
- Vendor lock-in due to proprietary technology without open-source alternatives
- Disorganized documentation and lack of online training resources
Pricing, plan by plan
JMP
Free- TrialFree
- 30-day trial
- Full features
- JMP$1785/year
- Core JMP
- Standard features
SingleStore
Free- Free Tier$0.99/month
- Usage-based pricing
- Limited resources
Which should you pick?
Choose JMP if
- You need custom design of experiments.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Mac, Windows.
- You also want linked interactive graphics.
Choose SingleStore if
- You need real-time analytics.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Cloud (SingleStoreDB Cloud), Self-Managed.
- You also want fast data ingest.
Questions people ask
- Is JMP or SingleStore better?
- Neither clearly leads. JMP starts at Free and SingleStore at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, JMP or SingleStore?
- JMP starts at Free and SingleStore at Free.
- Does JMP or SingleStore run on more platforms?
- JMP runs on Mac, Windows. SingleStore runs on Cloud (SingleStoreDB Cloud), Self-Managed.
- Can I use JMP for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is JMP best used for?
- JMP is most often used for planning a physical experiment where each run is expensive, and the question is which twelve runs to perform rather than how to model data you already have, process capability and control chart work in a manufacturing quality function that has to produce evidence for a customer or regulator, exploratory analysis by an engineer or scientist who will not write code but needs more than a spreadsheet, semiconductor, chemical and pharmaceutical development groups where jmp is already the shared language for reporting results. Of those, planning a physical experiment where each run is expensive, and the question is which twelve runs to perform rather than how to model data you already have and process capability and control chart work in a manufacturing quality function that has to produce evidence for a customer or regulator are not what SingleStore is typically brought in for.
- What can JMP do that SingleStore cannot?
- JMP covers Custom design of experiments, Linked interactive graphics, Analysis platforms, Quality and process tools. SingleStore covers Real-time Analytics, Fast Data Ingest, In-memory Processing, Distributed Architecture.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
JMP: Is JMP the same thing as SAS?
No. JMP is a separate desktop product from a SAS subsidiary, with its own interface, its own scripting language and its own licence. Knowing SAS does not transfer to it beyond the statistics.
SingleStore: Does SingleStore offer a free tier?
Yes, SingleStore offers a free tier starting from $0.99/month with usage-based pricing. The free tier allows developers to evaluate the platform with limited resources before scaling to production workloads.
SourceJMP: Do I need JMP Pro?
If you want cross validation, penalised regression, boosted trees or neural networks, yes. The base edition covers classical statistics, graphics and design of experiments well and stops short of predictive modelling.
SingleStore: Can SingleStore handle both transactional and analytical workloads?
Yes, SingleStore is a hybrid transactional/analytical processing (HTAP) database that combines operational (OLTP) and analytical (OLAP) workloads in a single unified engine, eliminating the need for separate systems.
SourceJMP: Does it run on Linux?
No. Windows and macOS only, as an installed application.
SingleStore: Does SingleStore integrate with Apache Spark?
Yes, SingleStore provides the Spark Connector 3.0 for bidirectional data integration with Apache Spark. The connector supports SQL, Python, Scala, Java, and R for data loading and extraction.
SourceJMP: Can I put a JMP model into production?
Only by exporting the scoring formula as SQL, C, Python or similar and running it in another system. JMP itself does not serve, monitor or retrain models.
SingleStore: Can SingleStore ingest data from Kafka?
Yes, SingleStore supports high-throughput streaming ingestion from Apache Kafka and other sources, enabling millions of events per second without requiring ETL pipelines or data movement.
SourceJMP: Who actually uses it?
Process and quality engineers, and scientists in R&D, particularly in semiconductor, chemicals, pharmaceutical and medical device work. It is not usually chosen by data engineering or platform teams.
SingleStore: Is SingleStore available as cloud or self-managed?
SingleStore offers both deployment options: SingleStoreDB Cloud (managed service) and SingleStore Self-Managed for on-premises or private cloud deployments. The managed service handles infrastructure, scaling, and maintenance automatically.
SourceRelated pages
More on SingleStore
Other head to heads
- JMP vs DataRobot
- JMP vs AWS SageMaker
- JMP vs Google Vertex AI
- JMP vs Azure Machine Learning
- JMP vs IBM SPSS
- JMP vs Minitab
- JMP vs Stata
- JMP vs Jupyter
- JMP vs Weights & Biases
- JMP vs Orange
- JMP vs Databricks
- JMP vs Snowflake
- JMP vs PyTorch
- JMP vs scikit-learn
- JMP vs Apache Spark MLlib
- JMP vs Weaviate
- JMP vs Alteryx
- JMP vs Apache Druid
- JMP vs ClickHouse
- JMP vs DuckDB
- JMP vs Elasticsearch
- JMP vs TiDB
- JMP vs Materialize
- JMP vs TimescaleDB
- JMP vs Estuary
- JMP vs Fivetran HVR
- JMP vs Firebolt
- JMP vs Nile
- JMP vs Ninox
- JMP vs Presto
- JMP vs Privacera
- JMP vs RavenDB
- JMP vs Readyset
- JMP vs Apache Pinot
- JMP vs Apache Flink
- SingleStore vs DataRobot
- SingleStore vs AWS SageMaker
- SingleStore vs Google Vertex AI
- SingleStore vs Azure Machine Learning
- SingleStore vs IBM SPSS
- SingleStore vs Minitab
- SingleStore vs Stata
- SingleStore vs Jupyter
- SingleStore vs Weights & Biases
- SingleStore vs Orange
- SingleStore vs Databricks
- SingleStore vs Snowflake
- SingleStore vs PyTorch
- SingleStore vs scikit-learn
- SingleStore vs Apache Spark MLlib
- SingleStore vs Weaviate
- SingleStore vs Alteryx
- SingleStore vs Apache Druid
- SingleStore vs ClickHouse
- SingleStore vs DuckDB
- SingleStore vs Elasticsearch
- SingleStore vs TiDB
- SingleStore vs Materialize
- SingleStore vs TimescaleDB
- SingleStore vs Estuary
- SingleStore vs Fivetran HVR
- SingleStore vs Firebolt
- SingleStore vs Nile
- SingleStore vs Ninox
- SingleStore vs Presto
- SingleStore vs Privacera
- SingleStore vs RavenDB
- SingleStore vs Readyset
- SingleStore vs Apache Pinot
- SingleStore vs Apache Flink
