Softwr

Machine Learning · head to head

JMP vs LOVO

JMP logo

JMP

Machine Learning

Desktop statistical and design of experiments software from a SAS subsidiary

From
Free
Free plan
Yes
Full reviewWebsite
LOVO logo

LOVO

AI

AI voice generator with emotion control

From
Free
Free plan
Yes
Full reviewWebsite

The short version

  • Each has a real cost: JMP it is a desktop application holding the working table in memory, so a data set that outgrows the workstation has no in-place upgrade path, only a move to a different tool and a different skill set.; LOVO the vendor's own pricing page as captured by the Internet Archive on 6 December 2022 listed LOVO Studio at three tiers in US dollars: Free at $0 with 3 downloads per month and 3 day access to premium voices for personal use only; Personal at $17.99 per month paid annually (or $25.99 paid monthly, both promotionally discounted from $34.99/$49.99) capped at 15,000 characters per download and up to 30 downloads per month with commercial rights; and Freelancer at $99.99 per month paid annually (or $149.99 paid monthly) with up to 100 downloads per month and commercial rights; API pricing required a custom quote
  • They diverge on capability: JMP covers Custom design of experiments, LOVO covers 500+ voices.
  • Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.

Where they differ

Only the attributes on which JMP and LOVO actually diverge.

Attributes where JMP and LOVO differ
AttributeJMPLOVO
Pricing modelsubscriptionfreemium
PlatformsMac, WindowsWeb, Api
CategoryMachine LearningAI
Founded19762019

Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).

What each one covers

Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.

Only in JMP

  • Custom design of experiments
  • Linked interactive graphics
  • Analysis platforms
  • Quality and process tools
  • Graph Builder
  • JSL scripting
  • Scoring code export
  • Predictive modelling in JMP Pro

Only in LOVO

  • 500+ voices
  • 100+ languages
  • Emotion control
  • Video editor
  • API access
  • Video creation tools
  • Web support
  • Api support

What people use each for

The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.

JMP

  • Planning a physical experiment where each run is expensive, and the question is which twelve runs to perform rather than how to model data you already havenot LOVO
  • Process capability and control chart work in a manufacturing quality function that has to produce evidence for a customer or regulatornot LOVO
  • Exploratory analysis by an engineer or scientist who will not write code but needs more than a spreadsheetnot LOVO
  • Semiconductor, chemical and pharmaceutical development groups where JMP is already the shared language for reporting resultsnot LOVO

LOVO

  • ai tools managementnot JMP
  • Workflow automationnot JMP
  • Reportingnot JMP

Where each one falls short

Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.

JMP

  • It is a desktop application holding the working table in memory, so a data set that outgrows the workstation has no in-place upgrade path, only a move to a different tool and a different skill set.
  • There is no Linux build and no server edition for running analyses, so JMP cannot sit in a scheduled pipeline the way an R or Python script can, and recurring reports depend on a named person running them on a laptop.
  • The predictive modelling capability most buyers mean when they call this machine learning software is in JMP Pro, a separate and more expensive licence, so the base product's price is not the price of the thing being evaluated.
  • JSL is proprietary to JMP, so the scripts, add-ins and automation a group accumulates over a decade do not port anywhere and become sunk cost the moment anyone questions the renewal.
  • Deployment ends at exported scoring code with no registry, monitoring or retraining, so a model that runs in production is maintained by another team in another language and steadily diverges from the version the analyst still has open.

LOVO

  • The vendor's own pricing page as captured by the Internet Archive on 6 December 2022 listed LOVO Studio at three tiers in US dollars: Free at $0 with 3 downloads per month and 3 day access to premium voices for personal use only; Personal at $17.99 per month paid annually (or $25.99 paid monthly, both promotionally discounted from $34.99/$49.99) capped at 15,000 characters per download and up to 30 downloads per month with commercial rights; and Freelancer at $99.99 per month paid annually (or $149.99 paid monthly) with up to 100 downloads per month and commercial rights; API pricing required a custom quote

Pricing, plan by plan

JMP

Free
  • TrialFree
    • 30-day trial
    • Full features
  • JMP$1785/year
    • Core JMP
    • Standard features

LOVO

Free
  • FreeFree
    • 14-day trial
    • Limited features
  • Basic$24/month
    • 30 downloads/month
    • All voices
  • Pro$48/month
    • Unlimited downloads
    • Voice cloning

Which should you pick?

Choose JMP if

  • You need custom design of experiments.
  • You want to start without paying.
  • You work on Mac, Windows.
  • You also want linked interactive graphics.
JMP review

Choose LOVO if

  • You need 500+ voices.
  • You want to start without paying.
  • You work on Web, Api.
  • You also want 100+ languages.
LOVO review

Questions people ask

Is JMP or LOVO better?
Neither clearly leads. JMP starts at Free and LOVO at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
Which is cheaper, JMP or LOVO?
JMP starts at Free and LOVO at Free.
Does JMP or LOVO run on more platforms?
JMP runs on Mac, Windows. LOVO runs on Web, Api.
Can I use JMP for free?
Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
What is JMP best used for?
JMP is most often used for planning a physical experiment where each run is expensive, and the question is which twelve runs to perform rather than how to model data you already have, process capability and control chart work in a manufacturing quality function that has to produce evidence for a customer or regulator, exploratory analysis by an engineer or scientist who will not write code but needs more than a spreadsheet, semiconductor, chemical and pharmaceutical development groups where jmp is already the shared language for reporting results. Of those, planning a physical experiment where each run is expensive, and the question is which twelve runs to perform rather than how to model data you already have and process capability and control chart work in a manufacturing quality function that has to produce evidence for a customer or regulator are not what LOVO is typically brought in for.
What can JMP do that LOVO cannot?
JMP covers Custom design of experiments, Linked interactive graphics, Analysis platforms, Quality and process tools. LOVO covers 500+ voices, 100+ languages, Emotion control, Video editor.

Answered from the vendors’ own pages

JMP: Is JMP the same thing as SAS?

No. JMP is a separate desktop product from a SAS subsidiary, with its own interface, its own scripting language and its own licence. Knowing SAS does not transfer to it beyond the statistics.

JMP: Do I need JMP Pro?

If you want cross validation, penalised regression, boosted trees or neural networks, yes. The base edition covers classical statistics, graphics and design of experiments well and stops short of predictive modelling.

JMP: Does it run on Linux?

No. Windows and macOS only, as an installed application.

JMP: Can I put a JMP model into production?

Only by exporting the scoring formula as SQL, C, Python or similar and running it in another system. JMP itself does not serve, monitor or retrain models.

JMP: Who actually uses it?

Process and quality engineers, and scientists in R&D, particularly in semiconductor, chemicals, pharmaceutical and medical device work. It is not usually chosen by data engineering or platform teams.

Share

Related pages

More on JMP

More on LOVO

Keep looking

Other head to heads