Testing · head to head
Insomnia vs Tricentis Tosca

Insomnia
Testing
REST and GraphQL API client for development and testing
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

Tricentis Tosca
Testing
Model based test automation for enterprise applications, with deep SAP and mainframe coverage
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Insomnia has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Insomnia git Sync on the free tier covers up to 3 users only; Tricentis Tosca licensing is quoted per workstation at enterprise figures, so the tool only pays back where testing headcount is already large; a team of five will not recover the cost.
- They diverge on capability: Insomnia covers REST API Client, Tricentis Tosca covers Model based test design.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Insomnia and Tricentis Tosca actually diverge.
| Attribute | Insomnia | Tricentis Tosca |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | Free | On request |
| Pricing model | freemium | quote |
| Free tier | Yes | No |
| Platforms | Windows, MacOS, Linux, Web | Windows, Web |
| Founded | 2010 | Unknown |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (Testing).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Insomnia
- REST API Client
- GraphQL Support
- gRPC Support
- GitHub
- GitLab
- Slack
- Windows support
- MacOS support
Only in Tricentis Tosca
- Model based test design
- SAP coverage
- Risk based test selection
- API and message layer testing
- Test data management
- Distributed execution
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Insomnia
- Sending and debugging HTTP, GraphQL and gRPC requestsnot Tricentis Tosca
- Storing collections in Git rather than a vendor cloudnot Tricentis Tosca
- Mocking an API endpoint before it existsnot Tricentis Tosca
- Running collections in CI with the Inso CLInot Tricentis Tosca
- Environment management across staging and productionnot Tricentis Tosca
Tricentis Tosca
- Regression testing an SAP estate through an S/4HANA migration where thousands of transactions must be verifiednot Insomnia
- A regulated organisation that needs auditable evidence of what was tested before each releasenot Insomnia
- Testing a mixed estate of browser, Windows desktop and mainframe applications from one suitenot Insomnia
- A test centre of excellence with dozens of testers where per screen maintenance beats per test maintenancenot Insomnia
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Insomnia
- Git Sync on the free tier covers up to 3 users only
- Mock servers are capped at 1,000 requests a month on free, then $10 per 25,000
- Role-based access control requires Pro at $12 per user per month
- SSO, SCIM and vault integrations are Enterprise only at $45 per user per month
- Working without an account is limited to the local-only Scratch Pad
Tricentis Tosca
- Licensing is quoted per workstation at enterprise figures, so the tool only pays back where testing headcount is already large; a team of five will not recover the cost.
- Building the initial application model takes months and is usually done with paid consultants, meaning value arrives long after the invoice does.
- The authoring environment is Windows only and heavy, which sits awkwardly in organisations whose engineers work on macOS or Linux.
- Tricentis has assembled its portfolio through acquisitions, so products sold together vary in how deeply they are integrated and a buyer should verify the joins rather than the diagram.
- Skills are specific to Tosca and not transferable, so recruiting testers means hiring for a niche tool and losing a trained one hurts more than losing a Selenium engineer.
Pricing, plan by plan
Insomnia
Free- EssentialsFree
- unlimited Cloud/Local projects
- up to 3 users with Git Sync
- 1,000 mock server requests/month
- Pro$12/user/month
- unlimited users with Git Sync access
- unlimited organizations
- role-based access control
- Enterprise$45/user/month
- Kong Konnect integration
- SSO (SAML/OIDC)
- SCIM provisioning
Tricentis Tosca
On request- Tricentis Tosca$undefined/year
- Quoted per workstation licence with separate execution agents and module packs
- Implementation is normally sold with partner services, which typically exceed first year licence cost
Which should you pick?
Choose Insomnia if
- You need rest api client.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Windows, MacOS, Linux, Web.
- You also want graphql support.
Choose Tricentis Tosca if
- You need model based test design.
- You work on Windows, Web.
- You also want sap coverage.
Questions people ask
- Is Insomnia or Tricentis Tosca better?
- Neither clearly leads. Insomnia starts at Free and Tricentis Tosca at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Insomnia or Tricentis Tosca?
- Insomnia has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for Insomnia and On request for Tricentis Tosca.
- Does Insomnia or Tricentis Tosca run on more platforms?
- Insomnia runs on Windows, MacOS, Linux, Web. Tricentis Tosca runs on Windows, Web.
- Can I use Insomnia for free?
- Yes. Insomnia has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Tricentis Tosca starts at On request.
- What is Insomnia best used for?
- Insomnia is most often used for sending and debugging http, graphql and grpc requests, storing collections in git rather than a vendor cloud, mocking an api endpoint before it exists, running collections in ci with the inso cli. Of those, sending and debugging http, graphql and grpc requests and storing collections in git rather than a vendor cloud are not what Tricentis Tosca is typically brought in for.
- What can Insomnia do that Tricentis Tosca cannot?
- Insomnia covers REST API Client, GraphQL Support, gRPC Support, GitHub. Tricentis Tosca covers Model based test design, SAP coverage, Risk based test selection, API and message layer testing.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Insomnia: How much does Insomnia cost?
Insomnia offers a free Essentials plan. Pro plans cost $12 per user per month with annual billing offering 17% savings. Enterprise plans cost $45 per user per month with support for up to 50 users self-serve; contact sales for larger teams.
SourceTricentis Tosca: Is Tosca scriptless?
Test assembly is scriptless, but non trivial estates still need TQL queries and custom modules, which is programming under another name.
Insomnia: Is there a free version of Insomnia?
Yes, the Essentials plan is free and includes unlimited Cloud and Local projects, Git Sync for up to 3 users, 1,000 mock server requests per month, Inso CLI, E2EE, custom linting, plugins, and AI features.
SourceTricentis Tosca: Why does it dominate SAP testing?
It holds SAP certification, covers SAP GUI and Fiori at transaction level, and is sold through the same integrators that run SAP programmes.
Insomnia: What mock server request limits apply to Insomnia plans?
Essentials includes 1,000 mock server requests per month. Pro includes 10,000 requests per month. Enterprise includes unlimited mock server requests. Additional mock server requests beyond plan allowances cost $10 per 25,000 requests.
SourceTricentis Tosca: Can it replace Selenium for a web only product?
It can, but the economics do not work. Model based testing pays off across large heterogeneous estates, not one web application.
Related pages
More on Tricentis Tosca
Other head to heads
- Insomnia vs Playwright
- Insomnia vs GitHub Actions
- Insomnia vs BrowserStack
- Insomnia vs Cypress
- Insomnia vs CircleCI
- Insomnia vs BugHerd
- Insomnia vs Zephyr Scale
- Insomnia vs Testsigma
- Insomnia vs Kameleoon
- Insomnia vs Appium
- Insomnia vs Qase
- Insomnia vs Cucumber
- Insomnia vs Applitools
- Insomnia vs pytest
- Insomnia vs Vitest
- Insomnia vs Percy
- Insomnia vs Jest
- Insomnia vs Selenium
- Insomnia vs TestRail
- Insomnia vs mabl
- Insomnia vs Ranorex
- Insomnia vs QA Wolf
- Insomnia vs Robot Framework
- Insomnia vs Katalon
- Insomnia vs WebdriverIO
- Insomnia vs Eppo
- Insomnia vs k6
- Insomnia vs PractiTest
- Insomnia vs Puppeteer
- Tricentis Tosca vs Playwright
- Tricentis Tosca vs GitHub Actions
- Tricentis Tosca vs BrowserStack
- Tricentis Tosca vs Cypress
- Tricentis Tosca vs CircleCI
- Tricentis Tosca vs BugHerd
- Tricentis Tosca vs Zephyr Scale
- Tricentis Tosca vs Testsigma
- Tricentis Tosca vs Kameleoon
- Tricentis Tosca vs Appium
- Tricentis Tosca vs Qase
- Tricentis Tosca vs Cucumber
- Tricentis Tosca vs Applitools
- Tricentis Tosca vs pytest
- Tricentis Tosca vs Vitest
- Tricentis Tosca vs Percy
- Tricentis Tosca vs Jest
- Tricentis Tosca vs Selenium
- Tricentis Tosca vs TestRail
- Tricentis Tosca vs mabl
- Tricentis Tosca vs Ranorex
- Tricentis Tosca vs QA Wolf
- Tricentis Tosca vs Robot Framework
- Tricentis Tosca vs Katalon
- Tricentis Tosca vs WebdriverIO
- Tricentis Tosca vs Eppo
- Tricentis Tosca vs k6
- Tricentis Tosca vs PractiTest
- Tricentis Tosca vs Puppeteer
