Testing · head to head
Insomnia vs Split

Insomnia
Testing
REST and GraphQL API client for development and testing
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

Split
Testing
Feature flags tied to a metrics pipeline that attributes production impact to each release, now Harness FME
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Insomnia has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Insomnia git Sync on the free tier covers up to 3 users only; Split split is now a module of the Harness platform and split.io redirects to harness.io, so buying it means entering a Harness commercial relationship rather than a standalone flag vendor contract.
- They diverge on capability: Insomnia covers REST API Client, Split covers Feature flags with targeting.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Insomnia and Split actually diverge.
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (Testing).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Insomnia
- REST API Client
- GraphQL Support
- gRPC Support
- GitHub
- GitLab
- Slack
- Windows support
- MacOS support
Only in Split
- Feature flags with targeting
- Metrics impact engine
- Guardrail metrics
- Statistical significance testing
- Event ingestion
- SDKs and streaming updates
- Audit and approvals
- Harness platform integration
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Insomnia
- Sending and debugging HTTP, GraphQL and gRPC requestsnot Split
- Storing collections in Git rather than a vendor cloudnot Split
- Mocking an API endpoint before it existsnot Split
- Running collections in CI with the Inso CLInot Split
- Environment management across staging and productionnot Split
Split
- A product organisation that wants every release measured against conversion and latency by default, not only deliberate experimentsnot Insomnia
- Running A/B tests with real statistical significance rather than comparing two dashboard linesnot Insomnia
- Catching a regression at five per cent rollout because a guardrail metric fires before the change reaches everyonenot Insomnia
- A team already committed to Harness for CI and CD that wants flags in the same platform and contractnot Insomnia
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Insomnia
- Git Sync on the free tier covers up to 3 users only
- Mock servers are capped at 1,000 requests a month on free, then $10 per 25,000
- Role-based access control requires Pro at $12 per user per month
- SSO, SCIM and vault integrations are Enterprise only at $45 per user per month
- Working without an account is limited to the local-only Scratch Pad
Split
- Split is now a module of the Harness platform and split.io redirects to harness.io, so buying it means entering a Harness commercial relationship rather than a standalone flag vendor contract.
- Harness no longer publishes per-module prices, so an organisation that wants only feature management cannot get a list price and must negotiate a module out of a platform bundle.
- The measurement engine needs traffic volume to reach significance, so a product with modest usage gets flags with an experimentation layer it will rarely be able to conclude anything from.
- Metric attribution depends on correctly instrumented events flowing into Split, which is an integration project in its own right; without it you have paid for an experimentation platform and are using it as a flag switch.
- As part of a larger DevOps suite the roadmap now competes with CI, CD, security and cloud cost modules for attention, so feature management is no longer the company’s single focus the way it was as an independent product.
Pricing, plan by plan
Insomnia
Free- EssentialsFree
- unlimited Cloud/Local projects
- up to 3 users with Git Sync
- 1,000 mock server requests/month
- Pro$12/user/month
- unlimited users with Git Sync access
- unlimited organizations
- role-based access control
- Enterprise$45/user/month
- Kong Konnect integration
- SSO (SAML/OIDC)
- SCIM provisioning
Split
On request- Harness FreeFree
- Harness Open Source and community support
- Intended for individuals and small teams
- Feature management capability limited at this tier
- Harness Essentials$undefined/year
- Bundled DevOps modules including CI, CD, IaC and security testing
- Standard support
- Pricing requires contacting sales
- Harness Enterprise$undefined/year
- Mix and match from 15 or more modules including Feature Management and Experimentation
- Premier support with a dedicated account manager
- Higher pipeline concurrency and organisation limits
Which should you pick?
Choose Insomnia if
- You need rest api client.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Windows, MacOS, Linux, Web.
- You also want graphql support.
Choose Split if
- You need feature flags with targeting.
- You work on Web, API, iOS, Android, Java, Node.js, Python, Go, .NET.
- You also want metrics impact engine.
Questions people ask
- Is Insomnia or Split better?
- Neither clearly leads. Insomnia starts at Free and Split at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Insomnia or Split?
- Insomnia has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for Insomnia and On request for Split.
- Does Insomnia or Split run on more platforms?
- Insomnia runs on Windows, MacOS, Linux, Web. Split runs on Web, API, iOS, Android, Java, Node.js, Python, Go, .NET.
- Can I use Insomnia for free?
- Yes. Insomnia has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Split starts at On request.
- What is Insomnia best used for?
- Insomnia is most often used for sending and debugging http, graphql and grpc requests, storing collections in git rather than a vendor cloud, mocking an api endpoint before it exists, running collections in ci with the inso cli. Of those, sending and debugging http, graphql and grpc requests and storing collections in git rather than a vendor cloud are not what Split is typically brought in for.
- What can Insomnia do that Split cannot?
- Insomnia covers REST API Client, GraphQL Support, gRPC Support, GitHub. Split covers Feature flags with targeting, Metrics impact engine, Guardrail metrics, Statistical significance testing.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Insomnia: How much does Insomnia cost?
Insomnia offers a free Essentials plan. Pro plans cost $12 per user per month with annual billing offering 17% savings. Enterprise plans cost $45 per user per month with support for up to 50 users self-serve; contact sales for larger teams.
SourceSplit: Is Split still called Split?
It is now sold as Harness Feature Management and Experimentation after the Harness acquisition, and split.io redirects to harness.io.
Insomnia: Is there a free version of Insomnia?
Yes, the Essentials plan is free and includes unlimited Cloud and Local projects, Git Sync for up to 3 users, 1,000 mock server requests per month, Inso CLI, E2EE, custom linting, plugins, and AI features.
SourceSplit: Can I buy just feature flags?
Not from a price list. Harness publishes bundle tiers and directs single-module buyers to sales.
Insomnia: What mock server request limits apply to Insomnia plans?
Essentials includes 1,000 mock server requests per month. Pro includes 10,000 requests per month. Enterprise includes unlimited mock server requests. Additional mock server requests beyond plan allowances cost $10 per 25,000 requests.
SourceSplit: What does it do that a plain flag service does not?
It attributes changes in your product metrics to specific flags with statistical significance testing and alerts on guardrail metrics.
Split: Do we need a lot of traffic?
Yes. Statistical tests need volume to conclude, so low-traffic products get limited value from the measurement layer.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Insomnia vs Playwright
- Insomnia vs GitHub Actions
- Insomnia vs BrowserStack
- Insomnia vs Cypress
- Insomnia vs CircleCI
- Insomnia vs BugHerd
- Insomnia vs Zephyr Scale
- Insomnia vs Testsigma
- Insomnia vs Kameleoon
- Insomnia vs Appium
- Insomnia vs Qase
- Insomnia vs Cucumber
- Insomnia vs Applitools
- Insomnia vs pytest
- Insomnia vs Vitest
- Insomnia vs Percy
- Insomnia vs Jest
- Insomnia vs Eppo
- Insomnia vs GrowthBook
- Insomnia vs Selenium
- Insomnia vs TestRail
- Insomnia vs Katalon
- Insomnia vs Sauce Labs
- Insomnia vs QA Wolf
- Insomnia vs Robot Framework
- Insomnia vs Detox
- Split vs Playwright
- Split vs GitHub Actions
- Split vs BrowserStack
- Split vs Cypress
- Split vs CircleCI
- Split vs BugHerd
- Split vs Zephyr Scale
- Split vs Testsigma
- Split vs Kameleoon
- Split vs Appium
- Split vs Qase
- Split vs Cucumber
- Split vs Applitools
- Split vs pytest
- Split vs Vitest
- Split vs Percy
- Split vs Jest
- Split vs Eppo
- Split vs GrowthBook
- Split vs Selenium
- Split vs TestRail
- Split vs Katalon
- Split vs Sauce Labs
- Split vs QA Wolf
- Split vs Robot Framework
- Split vs Detox
