Cloud · head to head
Infracost vs Logto

Infracost
Cloud
Cloud cost estimates in pull requests, with governance in the paid tier
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

Logto
Cybersecurity
Open-source identity and authentication infrastructure for apps and APIs
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Infracost usage-based resources such as object storage, serverless functions and data transfer have no cost without monthly usage figures supplied by hand, and the documentation warns plainly that engineers otherwise read them as free.; Logto advanced features like RBAC, organizations, MFA, and enterprise SSO are billed as separate paid add-ons rather than included in Pro.
- They diverge on capability: Infracost covers Pull request cost diffs, Logto covers Prebuilt sign-in UI.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Infracost and Logto actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Infracost
- Pull request cost diffs
- Multi-format parsing
- Apache-2.0 CLI
- FinOps policies
- Automated remediation
- IDE integration
Only in Logto
- Prebuilt sign-in UI
- Social connectors
- Role-based access control
- Multi-factor authentication
- Machine-to-machine apps
- Audit logs
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Infracost
- Teams that want an expensive infrastructure change questioned at review rather than discovered on an invoicenot Logto
- Platform groups enforcing tagging so cloud spend can be attributed to a team at allnot Logto
- Organisations adopting FinOps practice without buying a full cloud management platformnot Logto
- Engineers who want a cost figure in the editor while writing the Terraformnot Logto
Logto
- Adding sign-in to a new SaaS productnot Infracost
- Implementing SSO for B2B customersnot Infracost
- Securing internal APIs with M2M tokensnot Infracost
- Adding RBAC and organizations to a multi-tenant appnot Infracost
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Infracost
- Usage-based resources such as object storage, serverless functions and data transfer have no cost without monthly usage figures supplied by hand, and the documentation warns plainly that engineers otherwise read them as free.
- Splitting production from non-production usage assumptions is not supported in the free usage file, which the docs attribute to a missing project filter, so that separation requires the paid product.
- The step from 250 to 1,000 dollars a month is large and the Cloud tier includes only ten admin seats, with developer seats charged at a figure that is not published, so the cost for a large organisation cannot be computed from the pricing page.
- Estimates are list price. Negotiated agreements, committed use discounts and reserved instance economics require SKU-level overrides available only on Enterprise, so the number in the pull request is not the number on the bill.
- The share of the product covered by the Apache-2.0 licence is shrinking. Checks, automated fixes, policies and agent integrations are all hosted-only, so the permissive licence increasingly protects the estimation engine rather than the product.
Logto
- Advanced features like RBAC, organizations, MFA, and enterprise SSO are billed as separate paid add-ons rather than included in Pro.
- Enterprise pricing is not published and requires contacting sales.
- Token-based billing can make cost forecasting harder than flat per-MAU pricing for high-traffic apps.
Pricing, plan by plan
Infracost
Free- FreeFree
- 1,000 runs a month
- Terraform, CloudFormation and CDK estimates
- Community support
- Starter$250/month
- 10,000 runs a month
- Email support
- Cloud$1000/month
- Ten admin seats, developer seats charged separately
- FinOps policies and cost guardrails
- Dashboards and audit trails
- Enterprise$undefined/year
- SKU-level price overrides for negotiated rates
- Business unit reporting
- SSO with SAML group mapping
Logto
Free- FreeFree
- Up to 50,000 MAU
- 50K tokens included
- 3 applications
- Pro$24/month
- Unlimited MAU and applications
- 3 included API resources
- Passkey sign-in
Which should you pick?
Choose Infracost if
- You need pull request cost diffs.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, macOS, Linux, Windows, Docker.
- You also want multi-format parsing.
Choose Logto if
- You need prebuilt sign-in ui.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on web, api.
- You also want social connectors.
Questions people ask
- Is Infracost or Logto better?
- Neither clearly leads. Infracost starts at Free and Logto at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Infracost or Logto?
- Infracost starts at Free and Logto at Free.
- Does Infracost or Logto run on more platforms?
- Infracost runs on Web, macOS, Linux, Windows, Docker. Logto runs on web, api.
- Can I use Infracost for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Infracost best used for?
- Infracost is most often used for teams that want an expensive infrastructure change questioned at review rather than discovered on an invoice, platform groups enforcing tagging so cloud spend can be attributed to a team at all, organisations adopting finops practice without buying a full cloud management platform, engineers who want a cost figure in the editor while writing the terraform. Of those, teams that want an expensive infrastructure change questioned at review rather than discovered on an invoice and platform groups enforcing tagging so cloud spend can be attributed to a team at all are not what Logto is typically brought in for.
- What can Infracost do that Logto cannot?
- Infracost covers Pull request cost diffs, Multi-format parsing, Apache-2.0 CLI, FinOps policies. Logto covers Prebuilt sign-in UI, Social connectors, Role-based access control, Multi-factor authentication.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Infracost: Is the open source version genuinely useful on its own?
Yes, for estimation. It parses your definitions and produces breakdowns and diffs locally. What it does not do is comment on pull requests, enforce policy or report across an organisation, all of which are hosted-only.
Logto: What does Logto cost?
Logto offers a Free plan at $0/month, a Pro plan starting at $24/month with 50K free tokens included, and a custom-priced Enterprise plan. Extra add-ons like RBAC or MFA are billed separately on Pro.
SourceInfracost: Will the estimate match my cloud bill?
No. It is list price. Committed use discounts, enterprise agreements and reserved instances need SKU-level overrides that sit in the Enterprise tier.
Logto: Is there a free plan, and what are its limits?
Yes. The Free plan supports up to 50,000 monthly active users, 3 total applications, 1 machine-to-machine app, 3 social connectors, 1 webhook, and 3-day audit log retention.
SourceInfracost: Why do my S3 and Lambda resources show no cost?
Usage-based resources need monthly usage values supplied in a usage file or defined centrally. Without them they estimate at zero, which is the documented behaviour and the most common way the tool misleads.
Logto: How is usage metered?
Logto uses token-based billing: only access tokens issued for authentication and authorization activity are counted, rather than charging purely per MAU.
SourceInfracost: Has the licence ever changed?
No. The command line tool has been Apache 2.0 throughout, with no Business Source or AGPL episode, which is unusual in this category.
Infracost: What is a run?
Not defined on the public pricing page, and the run allowance is what separates the free and Starter tiers, so establish the definition before choosing between them.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Infracost vs Terragrunt
- Infracost vs Pulumi
- Infracost vs Packer
- Infracost vs Serverless Framework
- Infracost vs SST
- Infracost vs Coolify
- Infracost vs CapRover
- Infracost vs DeepInfra
- Infracost vs Linode
- Infracost vs VictoriaMetrics
- Infracost vs Contabo
- Infracost vs Chef
- Infracost vs Cilium
- Infracost vs Vagrant
- Infracost vs containerd
- Infracost vs Ory
- Infracost vs authentik
- Infracost vs Authelia
- Infracost vs Clerk
- Infracost vs 1Password
- Infracost vs Frontegg
- Infracost vs Sigstore
- Infracost vs Infisical
- Infracost vs OWASP ZAP
- Infracost vs Bitwarden
- Infracost vs Semgrep
- Infracost vs Veriff
- Infracost vs Brave Browser
- Infracost vs March Networks
- Infracost vs Salient CompleteView
- Infracost vs Sumsub
- Infracost vs Tuta
- Infracost vs Ory Kratos
- Logto vs Terragrunt
- Logto vs Pulumi
- Logto vs Packer
- Logto vs Serverless Framework
- Logto vs SST
- Logto vs Coolify
- Logto vs CapRover
- Logto vs DeepInfra
- Logto vs Linode
- Logto vs VictoriaMetrics
- Logto vs Contabo
- Logto vs Chef
- Logto vs Cilium
- Logto vs Vagrant
- Logto vs containerd
- Logto vs Ory
- Logto vs authentik
- Logto vs Authelia
- Logto vs Clerk
- Logto vs 1Password
- Logto vs Frontegg
- Logto vs Sigstore
- Logto vs Infisical
- Logto vs OWASP ZAP
- Logto vs Bitwarden
- Logto vs Semgrep
- Logto vs Veriff
- Logto vs Brave Browser
- Logto vs March Networks
- Logto vs Salient CompleteView
- Logto vs Sumsub
- Logto vs Tuta
- Logto vs Ory Kratos
