Government · head to head
Incode vs Teleport

Teleport
Cybersecurity
Certificate-based access to servers, Kubernetes, databases and apps, replacing shared credentials and VPNs
- From
- On request
- Free plan
- No
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Incode incode is now sold as Tyler ERP Pro and tylertech.com/products/incode redirects to the ERP Pro product page; Teleport pricing is not published and is described as active users plus protected resources, so an autoscaling estate cannot forecast the bill and finance teams discover the true cost only after the first true-up.
- They diverge on capability: Incode covers General Ledger, Teleport covers Short-lived certificates.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Incode and Teleport actually diverge.
Identical on both: free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Incode
- General Ledger
- Accounts Payable
- Payroll Management
- Utility Billing
- Budget Management
- Bank Integrations
- ADP
- Third-party Payroll
Only in Teleport
- Short-lived certificates
- Protocol coverage
- Session recording and replay
- Access Requests
- Device Trust
- Identity provider integration
- Machine identity
- FIPS and FedRAMP builds
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Incode
- Financial management and ERP for small and mid-sized local governmentsnot Teleport
- Utility billing, payroll and human resources for city and county administrationnot Teleport
- Court and public safety records for municipalitiesnot Teleport
Teleport
- Removing long-lived SSH keys and shared database passwords so that offboarding an engineer takes one action in the identity providernot Incode
- Producing session recordings and per-user database audit trails as direct evidence for SOC 2 or FedRAMPnot Incode
- Giving contractors or on-call engineers time-boxed, approved access to production instead of standing admin rightsnot Incode
- Replacing a flat VPN with per-resource authorisation across servers, Kubernetes and internal web appsnot Incode
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Incode
- Incode is now sold as Tyler ERP Pro and tylertech.com/products/incode redirects to the ERP Pro product page
- No pricing is published; Tyler routes all enquiries through contact and demo requests with no published rate, minimum or cost driver
- The product is sold only to public sector organisations
Teleport
- Pricing is not published and is described as active users plus protected resources, so an autoscaling estate cannot forecast the bill and finance teams discover the true cost only after the first true-up.
- The proxy is a hard dependency on reaching production, so it needs its own high availability deployment and a tested break-glass path or an outage in Teleport becomes an outage in your ability to respond to outages.
- The open source Community Edition omits Access Requests, Device Trust and the FIPS builds, which are exactly the controls an auditor asks about, so the free tier rarely survives a compliance review.
- Self-hosting means running and upgrading a certificate authority and its backing store, and Teleport releases frequently enough that upgrade work becomes a standing operational commitment.
- Coverage across protocols is uneven in depth, so teams with legacy systems, unusual databases or bespoke network appliances find gaps that still require the old VPN to remain in place alongside it.
Pricing, plan by plan
Incode
$700/month- Municipal Suite$700/month
- Financial Management
- HR/Payroll
- Utility Billing
Teleport
On request- Teleport Community Edition$undefined/year
- Open source, self-hosted
- SSH, Kubernetes, database and app access
- Session recording
- Teleport Enterprise$undefined/year
- Cloud-hosted or self-hosted
- Access Requests and approval workflow
- Device Trust and hardware key enforcement
Which should you pick?
Choose Incode if
- You need general ledger.
- You work on Web, Desktop.
- You also want accounts payable.
Choose Teleport if
- You need short-lived certificates.
- You work on Linux, macOS, Windows, Kubernetes, Cloud.
- You also want protocol coverage.
Questions people ask
- Is Incode or Teleport better?
- Neither clearly leads. Incode starts at $700/month and Teleport at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Incode or Teleport?
- Incode starts at $700/month and Teleport at On request.
- Does Incode or Teleport run on more platforms?
- Incode runs on Web, Desktop. Teleport runs on Linux, macOS, Windows, Kubernetes, Cloud.
- What is Incode best used for?
- Incode is most often used for financial management and erp for small and mid-sized local governments, utility billing, payroll and human resources for city and county administration, court and public safety records for municipalities. Of those, financial management and erp for small and mid-sized local governments and utility billing, payroll and human resources for city and county administration are not what Teleport is typically brought in for.
- What can Incode do that Teleport cannot?
- Incode covers General Ledger, Accounts Payable, Payroll Management, Utility Billing. Teleport covers Short-lived certificates, Protocol coverage, Session recording and replay, Access Requests.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Teleport: Is the open source edition usable in production?
Yes, but it lacks Access Requests, Device Trust and FIPS builds, which most compliance programmes end up requiring.
Teleport: How is it priced?
Not publicly. The vendor prices on active users and protected resources and provides a quote after a sales conversation.
Teleport: What happens if Teleport goes down?
Nobody reaches the resources behind it, so you need a highly available deployment and a documented break-glass procedure.
Teleport: Does it replace our VPN?
For anything you put behind it, yes. Legacy systems and appliances it does not support will keep the VPN alive.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Incode vs CivicPlus
- Incode vs Granicus
- Incode vs Accela
- Incode vs DocuWare
- Incode vs Workday Government
- Incode vs Springbrook Software
- Incode vs SAP for Government
- Incode vs Mapbox Government
- Incode vs OpenCities
- Incode vs CentralSquare
- Incode vs Axon Records
- Incode vs Nextdoor for Government
- Incode vs Oracle Government Cloud
- Incode vs Palantir Gotham
- Incode vs Periscope Holdings
- Incode vs Ring Neighbors
- Incode vs CivicPlus Asset Management
- Incode vs JumpCloud
- Incode vs HashiCorp Vault
- Incode vs HashiCorp Boundary
- Incode vs Beyond Identity
- Incode vs Falco
- Incode vs Delinea
- Incode vs Sysdig
- Incode vs BeyondTrust
- Incode vs One Identity
- Incode vs Zscaler Internet Access
- Incode vs Doppler
- Incode vs Infisical
- Incode vs Akeyless
- Incode vs DataGrail
- Incode vs Envysion
- Incode vs Feedzai
- Teleport vs CivicPlus
- Teleport vs Granicus
- Teleport vs Accela
- Teleport vs DocuWare
- Teleport vs Workday Government
- Teleport vs Springbrook Software
- Teleport vs SAP for Government
- Teleport vs Mapbox Government
- Teleport vs OpenCities
- Teleport vs CentralSquare
- Teleport vs Axon Records
- Teleport vs Nextdoor for Government
- Teleport vs Oracle Government Cloud
- Teleport vs Palantir Gotham
- Teleport vs Periscope Holdings
- Teleport vs Ring Neighbors
- Teleport vs CivicPlus Asset Management
- Teleport vs JumpCloud
- Teleport vs HashiCorp Vault
- Teleport vs HashiCorp Boundary
- Teleport vs Beyond Identity
- Teleport vs Falco
- Teleport vs Delinea
- Teleport vs Sysdig
- Teleport vs BeyondTrust
- Teleport vs One Identity
- Teleport vs Zscaler Internet Access
- Teleport vs Doppler
- Teleport vs Infisical
- Teleport vs Akeyless
- Teleport vs DataGrail
- Teleport vs Envysion
- Teleport vs Feedzai

