Softwr

Energy · head to head

Generac Grid Services vs iHawk by Cyberhawk

Generac Grid Services logo

Generac Grid Services

Energy

Virtual power plant and distributed energy management platform

From
On request
Rated
-
Full reviewWebsite
iHawk by Cyberhawk logo

iHawk by Cyberhawk

Energy

Asset inspection data platform sold by a drone inspection service company, not standalone software

From
On request
Rated
-
Full reviewWebsite

The short version

  • Each has a real cost: Generac Grid Services no pricing plans, tiers, costs, or pricing models are published on the website; iHawk by Cyberhawk cyberhawk's business is inspection services, so the platform is normally sold as part of a capture contract and the software line item cannot be compared cleanly against standalone asset inspection platforms
  • They diverge on capability: Generac Grid Services covers Virtual power plant orchestration, iHawk by Cyberhawk covers Visual data management.
  • Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.

Where they differ

Only the attributes on which Generac Grid Services and iHawk by Cyberhawk actually diverge.

Attributes where Generac Grid Services and iHawk by Cyberhawk differ
AttributeGenerac Grid ServicesiHawk by Cyberhawk
PlatformsWeb, Mobile, ApiWeb
Founded1959Unknown

Identical on both: starting price (On request), pricing model (quote), free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Energy).

What each one covers

Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.

Only in Generac Grid Services

  • Virtual power plant orchestration
  • Real-time DER dispatch
  • Grid frequency regulation
  • Demand response automation
  • Battery fleet management
  • EV charging optimization
  • Load forecasting
  • Market participation

Only in iHawk by Cyberhawk

  • Visual data management
  • Defect tagging and tracking
  • Visualive AI review
  • Geospatial layers
  • Asset hierarchy
  • Progress monitoring
  • Reporting and export

What people use each for

The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.

Generac Grid Services

  • Grid balancingnot iHawk by Cyberhawk
  • Peak shavingnot iHawk by Cyberhawk
  • Frequency regulationnot iHawk by Cyberhawk
  • Capacity marketsnot iHawk by Cyberhawk
  • Renewable integrationnot iHawk by Cyberhawk

iHawk by Cyberhawk

  • A transmission operator inspecting several thousand towers annually that needs defect history per structure rather than a folder of photographs per campaignnot Generac Grid Services
  • An offshore operator that wants flare tip and structural inspection imagery held against the same asset tags used in its maintenance systemnot Generac Grid Services
  • A capital project owner tracking construction progress from repeated aerial capture over a two year buildnot Generac Grid Services
  • A utility responding to a regulator that requires evidence of condition assessment across a defined asset populationnot Generac Grid Services

Where each one falls short

Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.

Generac Grid Services

  • No pricing plans, tiers, costs, or pricing models are published on the website
  • Customers must use a 'Get an Estimate' feature or contact sales directly

iHawk by Cyberhawk

  • Cyberhawk's business is inspection services, so the platform is normally sold as part of a capture contract and the software line item cannot be compared cleanly against standalone asset inspection platforms
  • Nothing is published about price, and because contracts bundle flights, processing and platform access, the recurring cost after the inspection campaign ends is often not clear at signature
  • The value of the platform grows with the length of the historical series held in it, which makes switching increasingly expensive over time and gives the vendor leverage at renewal
  • It is a review and management platform rather than an enterprise asset management system, so defect findings still need to reach SAP or Maximo to become work orders, and that integration is a project in its own right
  • Automated defect detection reduces review effort but does not remove the need for qualified inspection engineers to sign off findings, so headcount savings are smaller than a technology-led business case usually assumes

Pricing, plan by plan

Generac Grid Services

On request

No published plan breakdown. See the Generac Grid Services review.

iHawk by Cyberhawk

On request
  • iHawk platform$undefined/year
    • Usually contracted together with Cyberhawk inspection services
    • Priced by asset count, data volume and inspection programme scope
    • Standalone platform licensing available on request but not the standard route

Which should you pick?

Choose Generac Grid Services if

  • You need virtual power plant orchestration.
  • You work on Web, Mobile, Api.
  • You also want real-time der dispatch.
Generac Grid Services review

Choose iHawk by Cyberhawk if

  • You need visual data management.
  • You also want defect tagging and tracking.
iHawk by Cyberhawk review

Questions people ask

Is Generac Grid Services or iHawk by Cyberhawk better?
Neither clearly leads. Generac Grid Services starts at On request and iHawk by Cyberhawk at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
Which is cheaper, Generac Grid Services or iHawk by Cyberhawk?
Generac Grid Services starts at On request and iHawk by Cyberhawk at On request.
Does Generac Grid Services or iHawk by Cyberhawk run on more platforms?
Generac Grid Services runs on Web, Mobile, Api. iHawk by Cyberhawk runs on Web.
What is Generac Grid Services best used for?
Generac Grid Services is most often used for grid balancing, peak shaving, frequency regulation, capacity markets. Of those, grid balancing and peak shaving are not what iHawk by Cyberhawk is typically brought in for.
What can Generac Grid Services do that iHawk by Cyberhawk cannot?
Generac Grid Services covers Virtual power plant orchestration, Real-time DER dispatch, Grid frequency regulation, Demand response automation. iHawk by Cyberhawk covers Visual data management, Defect tagging and tracking, Visualive AI review, Geospatial layers.

Answered from the vendors’ own pages

Generac Grid Services: How does Generac Grid Services publish pricing?

Generac Grid Services does not publish specific pricing on their website. Customers can request estimates through the 'Get an Estimate' feature or contact support at 1-888-Generac (1-888-436-3722).

Source
iHawk by Cyberhawk: Can I buy iHawk without Cyberhawk's inspection services?

Ask explicitly. The company positions the platform as enterprise software, but its normal route to market is bundled with data capture, so standalone terms are negotiated rather than listed.

Generac Grid Services: What are Generac's contact options for pricing?

For pricing inquiries, contact Generac at 1-888-Generac (436-3722) for US/Canada or use the 'Get an Estimate' feature on their website for custom quote generation.

Source
iHawk by Cyberhawk: Who owns the inspection data?

That is contract-specific and should be settled before signature, including what format you receive on exit and whether historical defect tagging comes with you.

iHawk by Cyberhawk: What does it cost?

Not published. Expect pricing driven by asset count, data volume and the scope of the inspection programme.

iHawk by Cyberhawk: Does it replace an asset management system?

No. It manages inspection data and findings. Work orders and maintenance planning stay in SAP, Maximo or your equivalent.

Share

Related pages

More on Generac Grid Services

More on iHawk by Cyberhawk

Keep looking

Other head to heads