Softwr

Energy · head to head

iHawk by Cyberhawk vs Pulse Energy Software

iHawk by Cyberhawk logo

iHawk by Cyberhawk

Energy

Asset inspection data platform sold by a drone inspection service company, not standalone software

From
On request
Rated
-
Full reviewWebsite
Pulse Energy Software logo

Pulse Energy Software

Energy

Grid modernization and smart utility software

From
On request
Rated
-
Full reviewWebsite

The short version

  • Each has a real cost: iHawk by Cyberhawk cyberhawk's business is inspection services, so the platform is normally sold as part of a capture contract and the software line item cannot be compared cleanly against standalone asset inspection platforms; Pulse Energy Software limited public information on platform specifications and technical architecture since becoming part of Enel X's broader offerings
  • They diverge on capability: iHawk by Cyberhawk covers Visual data management, Pulse Energy Software covers DER management.
  • Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.

Where they differ

Only the attributes on which iHawk by Cyberhawk and Pulse Energy Software actually diverge.

Attributes where iHawk by Cyberhawk and Pulse Energy Software differ
AttributeiHawk by CyberhawkPulse Energy Software
PlatformsWebWeb, Mobile
FoundedUnknown2006

Identical on both: starting price (On request), pricing model (quote), free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Energy).

What each one covers

Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.

Only in iHawk by Cyberhawk

  • Visual data management
  • Defect tagging and tracking
  • Visualive AI review
  • Geospatial layers
  • Asset hierarchy
  • Progress monitoring
  • Reporting and export

Only in Pulse Energy Software

  • DER management
  • Demand response
  • Grid analytics
  • Voltage optimization
  • Reporting tools
  • SSL encryption
  • On-premise deployment
  • Cloud deployment

What people use each for

The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.

iHawk by Cyberhawk

  • A transmission operator inspecting several thousand towers annually that needs defect history per structure rather than a folder of photographs per campaignnot Pulse Energy Software
  • An offshore operator that wants flare tip and structural inspection imagery held against the same asset tags used in its maintenance systemnot Pulse Energy Software
  • A capital project owner tracking construction progress from repeated aerial capture over a two year buildnot Pulse Energy Software
  • A utility responding to a regulator that requires evidence of condition assessment across a defined asset populationnot Pulse Energy Software

Pulse Energy Software

  • Grid modernizationnot iHawk by Cyberhawk
  • DER managementnot iHawk by Cyberhawk

Where each one falls short

Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.

iHawk by Cyberhawk

  • Cyberhawk's business is inspection services, so the platform is normally sold as part of a capture contract and the software line item cannot be compared cleanly against standalone asset inspection platforms
  • Nothing is published about price, and because contracts bundle flights, processing and platform access, the recurring cost after the inspection campaign ends is often not clear at signature
  • The value of the platform grows with the length of the historical series held in it, which makes switching increasingly expensive over time and gives the vendor leverage at renewal
  • It is a review and management platform rather than an enterprise asset management system, so defect findings still need to reach SAP or Maximo to become work orders, and that integration is a project in its own right
  • Automated defect detection reduces review effort but does not remove the need for qualified inspection engineers to sign off findings, so headcount savings are smaller than a technology-led business case usually assumes

Pulse Energy Software

  • Limited public information on platform specifications and technical architecture since becoming part of Enel X's broader offerings
  • Focus on commercial and industrial customers means less functionality for residential utility programs
  • Steep cost of implementation and training for utility companies transitioning from legacy systems

Pricing, plan by plan

iHawk by Cyberhawk

On request
  • iHawk platform$undefined/year
    • Usually contracted together with Cyberhawk inspection services
    • Priced by asset count, data volume and inspection programme scope
    • Standalone platform licensing available on request but not the standard route

Pulse Energy Software

On request

No published plan breakdown. See the Pulse Energy Software review.

Which should you pick?

Choose iHawk by Cyberhawk if

  • You need visual data management.
  • You also want defect tagging and tracking.
iHawk by Cyberhawk review

Choose Pulse Energy Software if

  • You need der management.
  • You work on Web, Mobile.
  • You also want demand response.
Pulse Energy Software review

Questions people ask

Is iHawk by Cyberhawk or Pulse Energy Software better?
Neither clearly leads. iHawk by Cyberhawk starts at On request and Pulse Energy Software at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
Which is cheaper, iHawk by Cyberhawk or Pulse Energy Software?
iHawk by Cyberhawk starts at On request and Pulse Energy Software at On request.
Does iHawk by Cyberhawk or Pulse Energy Software run on more platforms?
iHawk by Cyberhawk runs on Web. Pulse Energy Software runs on Web, Mobile.
What is iHawk by Cyberhawk best used for?
iHawk by Cyberhawk is most often used for a transmission operator inspecting several thousand towers annually that needs defect history per structure rather than a folder of photographs per campaign, an offshore operator that wants flare tip and structural inspection imagery held against the same asset tags used in its maintenance system, a capital project owner tracking construction progress from repeated aerial capture over a two year build, a utility responding to a regulator that requires evidence of condition assessment across a defined asset population. Of those, a transmission operator inspecting several thousand towers annually that needs defect history per structure rather than a folder of photographs per campaign and an offshore operator that wants flare tip and structural inspection imagery held against the same asset tags used in its maintenance system are not what Pulse Energy Software is typically brought in for.
What can iHawk by Cyberhawk do that Pulse Energy Software cannot?
iHawk by Cyberhawk covers Visual data management, Defect tagging and tracking, Visualive AI review, Geospatial layers. Pulse Energy Software covers DER management, Demand response, Grid analytics, Voltage optimization.

Answered from the vendors’ own pages

iHawk by Cyberhawk: Can I buy iHawk without Cyberhawk's inspection services?

Ask explicitly. The company positions the platform as enterprise software, but its normal route to market is bundled with data capture, so standalone terms are negotiated rather than listed.

Pulse Energy Software: What is Pulse Energy Software?

Pulse Energy is a customer engagement and energy intelligence platform for utilities' commercial and industrial customers. It helps utilities deliver energy efficiency recommendations, engage occupants in conservation, and measure energy performance.

Source
iHawk by Cyberhawk: Who owns the inspection data?

That is contract-specific and should be settled before signature, including what format you receive on exit and whether historical defect tagging comes with you.

Pulse Energy Software: Who owns Pulse Energy now?

Pulse Energy was acquired by EnerNOC in 2014, which was then acquired by Enel in 2017. EnerNOC was rebranded as Enel X in 2018. Pulse Energy is now part of the Yardi Smart Energy Suite.

Source
iHawk by Cyberhawk: What does it cost?

Not published. Expect pricing driven by asset count, data volume and the scope of the inspection programme.

Pulse Energy Software: What utilities use Pulse Energy?

Major utilities using Pulse Energy include British Gas, PG&E, and BC Hydro. The platform combined with EnerNOC serves 54 utilities worldwide with capabilities to manage 14,000 sites.

Source
iHawk by Cyberhawk: Does it replace an asset management system?

No. It manages inspection data and findings. Work orders and maintenance planning stay in SAP, Maximo or your equivalent.

Pulse Energy Software: What data does Pulse Energy collect?

Pulse Energy collects real-time energy information from commercial buildings, performing fault detection, identifying energy-saving anomalies, and measuring financial and environmental performance for utilities and their commercial customers.

Source
Pulse Energy Software: Does Pulse Energy integrate with other platforms?

Pulse Energy provides APIs and integration capabilities. As part of Yardi's energy suite, it integrates with utility billing, energy procurement, and sustainability solutions.

Source
Share

Related pages

More on iHawk by Cyberhawk

More on Pulse Energy Software

Keep looking

Other head to heads