Cybersecurity · head to head
IDnow vs Steampipe

IDnow
Cybersecurity
Identity verification and qualified electronic signature for regulated European markets
- From
- On request
- Free plan
- No

Steampipe
Developer Tools
Query cloud APIs, SaaS tools and code with SQL, with no extract or load step
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes
The short version
- Only Steampipe has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: IDnow agent-led video identification costs several times an automated check and depends on agent availability, so peak-time queues push abandonment up at exactly the moment conversion matters.; Steampipe aGPL-3.0 across all four engines is a procurement blocker at organisations that ban the licence outright, and the network clause reaches any internal portal or service that puts a web interface in front of it.
- They diverge on capability: IDnow covers VideoIdent, Steampipe covers SQL over live APIs.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which IDnow and Steampipe actually diverge.
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in IDnow
- VideoIdent
- AutoIdent
- eSign
- eID and NFC
- Bank identification
- EU data processing
Only in Steampipe
- SQL over live APIs
- Wide plugin set
- Embedded Postgres
- Compliance benchmarks
- Joins across providers
- Hosted option
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
IDnow
- A German bank opening regulated accounts where BaFin requires a recognised identification methodnot Steampipe
- An insurer needing a qualified electronic signature that will survive challenge in a European courtnot Steampipe
- A telecom operator meeting national SIM registration identity rules across several EU statesnot Steampipe
- A lender wanting automated checks for low-risk applicants and video identification only for high-value casesnot Steampipe
Steampipe
- Security teams answering posture questions against live cloud accounts rather than a nightly exportnot IDnow
- Compliance evidence gathering where the answer must reflect the account at the moment it is askednot IDnow
- Inventory and drift questions spanning several cloud providers in one querynot IDnow
- Engineers who would rather write SQL than learn each provider command line toolnot IDnow
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
IDnow
- Agent-led video identification costs several times an automated check and depends on agent availability, so peak-time queues push abandonment up at exactly the moment conversion matters.
- Pricing is quoted with an annual volume commitment, so the accreditation advantage comes with a floor you pay whether or not you use it.
- The product is optimised for European regulatory regimes, so buyers verifying users in North America, Asia or Africa will find coverage and cost less competitive than global specialists.
- Qualified electronic signature is a separate licence from identity verification, which surprises buyers who assumed the accredited identity check made the signature capability included.
- Integration for the regulated flows is heavier than a simple SDK drop-in because the compliant journey, including consent and recording requirements, constrains the user experience you can build.
Steampipe
- AGPL-3.0 across all four engines is a procurement blocker at organisations that ban the licence outright, and the network clause reaches any internal portal or service that puts a web interface in front of it.
- Dashboards, benchmarks and mods were removed from Steampipe entirely at version 1.0 in October 2024 and now live in a separate product, so pre-2024 documentation and tutorials describe commands that no longer exist.
- Live querying is bound by cloud provider API rate limits and keeps no persistent store by default, which is why a separate DuckDB-backed product exists for log volumes and why large accounts return slowly.
- The company is fifteen people and bootstrapped, maintaining four command line tools plus a hosted service plus two further products, and the newer tools have thin community traction relative to that surface area.
- Hosted tiers include only three users regardless of tier, with additional Enterprise users charged separately, so a team of thirty costs an order of magnitude more than the headline figure before compute and storage are counted.
Pricing, plan by plan
IDnow
On request- IDnow Platform$undefined/year
- Per-identification pricing that differs sharply between automated and agent-led methods
- Annual volume commitment typically required
- Qualified electronic signature licensed separately
Steampipe
Free- Steampipe CLIFree
- AGPL-3.0
- All plugins
- No user or query limits
- Pipes DeveloperFree
- One user
- 400 compute minutes
- 3GB storage
- Pipes Team$49/month
- Three users
- 2,000 compute minutes
- 20GB storage
- Pipes Enterprise$249/month
- Three users
- 10,000 compute minutes
- 100GB storage
Which should you pick?
Choose IDnow if
- You need videoident.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android, API.
- You also want autoident.
Choose Steampipe if
- You need sql over live apis.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on macOS, Linux, Windows, Docker, Web.
- You also want wide plugin set.
Questions people ask
- Is IDnow or Steampipe better?
- Neither clearly leads. IDnow starts at On request and Steampipe at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, IDnow or Steampipe?
- Steampipe has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at On request for IDnow and Free for Steampipe.
- Does IDnow or Steampipe run on more platforms?
- IDnow runs on Web, iOS, Android, API. Steampipe runs on macOS, Linux, Windows, Docker, Web.
- Can I use Steampipe for free?
- Yes. Steampipe has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. IDnow starts at On request.
- What is IDnow best used for?
- IDnow is most often used for a german bank opening regulated accounts where bafin requires a recognised identification method, an insurer needing a qualified electronic signature that will survive challenge in a european court, a telecom operator meeting national sim registration identity rules across several eu states, a lender wanting automated checks for low-risk applicants and video identification only for high-value cases. Of those, a german bank opening regulated accounts where bafin requires a recognised identification method and an insurer needing a qualified electronic signature that will survive challenge in a european court are not what Steampipe is typically brought in for.
- What can IDnow do that Steampipe cannot?
- IDnow covers VideoIdent, AutoIdent, eSign, eID and NFC. Steampipe covers SQL over live APIs, Wide plugin set, Embedded Postgres, Compliance benchmarks.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
IDnow: Why choose it over a cheaper automated vendor?
Because in some European regimes the cheaper vendor is not legally permitted for the transaction. This is an eligibility question, not a quality one.
Steampipe: When did Steampipe become AGPL?
May 2021, about four months after the project went public. It is a settled licence rather than a recent change, and predates the Business Source Licence wave it is often confused with.
IDnow: Is the electronic signature included?
No. Qualified electronic signature under eIDAS is licensed separately from identity verification.
Steampipe: Where did the dashboards and benchmarks go?
Into Powerpipe. They were deprecated in March 2024 and removed from Steampipe at version 1.0 in October 2024, so the check, dashboard, mod and variable commands are gone.
IDnow: Where is the data processed?
In European data centres, which is a requirement rather than a preference for many of its regulated customers.
Steampipe: Is it fast on a large cloud estate?
Not always. Queries call provider APIs at request time, so rate limits rather than query planning set the pace, and there is no persistent store by default.
Steampipe: Does the AGPL affect internal use?
Running it internally for your own analysis is fine. Putting a web interface in front of it that other people use is where the network clause becomes a question for your legal team.
Steampipe: Is a bootstrapped vendor a risk?
It cuts both ways. There is no investor pressure toward a licence change or an exit, and there are also fifteen people supporting a large product surface.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- IDnow vs iDenfy
- IDnow vs Veriff
- IDnow vs Yoti
- IDnow vs Signicat
- IDnow vs Jumio
- IDnow vs Trulioo
- IDnow vs Shufti Pro
- IDnow vs Sumsub
- IDnow vs Socure
- IDnow vs Fenergo
- IDnow vs Quantexa
- IDnow vs Salient CompleteView
- IDnow vs Osano
- IDnow vs Proton Mail
- IDnow vs Brave Browser
- IDnow vs March Networks
- IDnow vs Atlantis
- IDnow vs Jitsu
- IDnow vs Frappe
- IDnow vs Visual Studio Code
- IDnow vs Penpot
- IDnow vs GNU Emacs
- IDnow vs Bazel
- IDnow vs Eclipse IDE
- IDnow vs Pants Build
- IDnow vs Swagger UI
- IDnow vs Ansible
- IDnow vs Helix
- IDnow vs Deep Code
- IDnow vs Deno
- IDnow vs Fig
- IDnow vs Git
- IDnow vs GoLand
- Steampipe vs iDenfy
- Steampipe vs Veriff
- Steampipe vs Yoti
- Steampipe vs Signicat
- Steampipe vs Jumio
- Steampipe vs Trulioo
- Steampipe vs Shufti Pro
- Steampipe vs Sumsub
- Steampipe vs Socure
- Steampipe vs Fenergo
- Steampipe vs Quantexa
- Steampipe vs Salient CompleteView
- Steampipe vs Osano
- Steampipe vs Proton Mail
- Steampipe vs Brave Browser
- Steampipe vs March Networks
- Steampipe vs Atlantis
- Steampipe vs Jitsu
- Steampipe vs Frappe
- Steampipe vs Visual Studio Code
- Steampipe vs Penpot
- Steampipe vs GNU Emacs
- Steampipe vs Bazel
- Steampipe vs Eclipse IDE
- Steampipe vs Pants Build
- Steampipe vs Swagger UI
- Steampipe vs Ansible
- Steampipe vs Helix
- Steampipe vs Deep Code
- Steampipe vs Deno
- Steampipe vs Fig
- Steampipe vs Git
- Steampipe vs GoLand
