Cybersecurity · head to head
Baffle vs Penpot

Baffle
Cybersecurity
Transparent proxy that encrypts, tokenises and masks database fields without application code changes
- From
- On request
- Free plan
- No

Penpot
Developer Tools
Open source design and prototyping platform
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes
The short version
- Only Penpot has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Baffle the proxy sits in the production data path, so it becomes a latency contributor and a failure domain, and any deployment needs load and failover testing that customers routinely underestimate.; Penpot smaller user base and community compared to Figma means fewer templates and resources
- They diverge on capability: Baffle covers Transparent proxy deployment, Penpot covers Vector editing.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Baffle and Penpot actually diverge.
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Baffle
- Transparent proxy deployment
- Field-level encryption
- Tokenisation
- Format-preserving de-identification
- Dynamic data masking
- Bring your own key
- Analytics and pipeline support
- AI pipeline protection
Only in Penpot
- Vector editing
- Interactive prototyping
- Design systems
- Components & libraries
- Real-time collaboration
- SVG support
- CSS Grid & Flexbox
- Code export
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Baffle
- A bank with a legacy application it cannot safely refactor that has an audit finding requiring field-level encryption of account datanot Penpot
- A company wanting to take a reporting database out of PCI scope by tokenising card fields before they landnot Penpot
- A healthcare organisation that must ensure database administrators and cloud operators cannot read patient identifiers in the tables they administernot Penpot
- A team moving regulated data into a warehouse or an AI retrieval pipeline that needs identifiers de-identified in transit without rewriting the ingest jobsnot Penpot
Penpot
- UI/UX designnot Baffle
- Prototypingnot Baffle
- Design systemsnot Baffle
- Developer handoffnot Baffle
- Open source projectsnot Baffle
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Baffle
- The proxy sits in the production data path, so it becomes a latency contributor and a failure domain, and any deployment needs load and failover testing that customers routinely underestimate.
- What you can still do in SQL depends on the protection mode chosen, and stronger modes restrict comparisons, joins and aggregations on protected columns, which can quietly break existing reports and analytics.
- Database and driver coverage is finite, so an organisation with an unusual engine, an old driver or heavy use of stored procedures may find its most important system is exactly the one not supported.
- Pricing is unpublished and scales with protected data stores, which means an enterprise trying to protect a long tail of small databases pays disproportionately compared with protecting a handful of large ones.
- Key management is your responsibility under bring your own key, and while that is the correct security posture, it moves a real operational burden and a genuine data-loss risk onto the customer.
Penpot
- Smaller user base and community compared to Figma means fewer templates and resources
- Self-hosting requires Linux server and Docker knowledge for technical setup
- Real-time collaboration features may have performance issues with very large design files
Pricing, plan by plan
Baffle
On request- Baffle Data Protection Services$undefined/year
- Quoted by protected data stores and deployment scale
- Self-managed and cloud marketplace deployment options
- Annual subscription
Penpot
Free- FreeFree
- Cloud-based design
- Real-time collaboration
- Components and variants
- Unlimited$7/month
- All free features
- Priority support
- Advanced cloud features
- Enterprise$950/month
- Custom enterprise features
- Dedicated support
- Advanced security
Which should you pick?
Choose Baffle if
- You need transparent proxy deployment.
- You work on Linux, Web.
- You also want field-level encryption.
Choose Penpot if
- You need vector editing.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Windows, macOS, Linux.
- You also want interactive prototyping.
Questions people ask
- Is Baffle or Penpot better?
- Neither clearly leads. Baffle starts at On request and Penpot at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Baffle or Penpot?
- Penpot has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at On request for Baffle and Free for Penpot.
- Does Baffle or Penpot run on more platforms?
- Baffle runs on Linux, Web. Penpot runs on Web, Windows, macOS, Linux.
- Can I use Penpot for free?
- Yes. Penpot has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Baffle starts at On request.
- What is Baffle best used for?
- Baffle is most often used for a bank with a legacy application it cannot safely refactor that has an audit finding requiring field-level encryption of account data, a company wanting to take a reporting database out of pci scope by tokenising card fields before they land, a healthcare organisation that must ensure database administrators and cloud operators cannot read patient identifiers in the tables they administer, a team moving regulated data into a warehouse or an ai retrieval pipeline that needs identifiers de-identified in transit without rewriting the ingest jobs. Of those, a bank with a legacy application it cannot safely refactor that has an audit finding requiring field-level encryption of account data and a company wanting to take a reporting database out of pci scope by tokenising card fields before they land are not what Penpot is typically brought in for.
- What can Baffle do that Penpot cannot?
- Baffle covers Transparent proxy deployment, Field-level encryption, Tokenisation, Format-preserving de-identification. Penpot covers Vector editing, Interactive prototyping, Design systems, Components & libraries.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Baffle: Do applications need code changes?
No. That is the central design choice. Baffle intercepts traffic as a proxy rather than requiring an SDK call at every read and write.
Penpot: Is Penpot really free?
Yes. Penpot is completely free with no feature gates. The open-source version can be self-hosted on your own infrastructure for zero cost beyond server expenses.
SourceBaffle: Can you still query encrypted columns?
Partly, and it depends on the protection mode. Some modes preserve equality matching and format, stronger modes restrict what SQL operations remain possible, so this must be tested against your actual queries.
Penpot: Can I self-host Penpot?
Yes. Penpot can be self-hosted on your own infrastructure with no licensing costs. Organizations with specific privacy or governance needs can run Penpot on their own servers.
SourceBaffle: Does it take systems out of PCI scope?
Tokenisation can reduce scope by ensuring card data never lands in the protected system, but scope reduction is an assessor judgement, not a product setting.
Penpot: What are the paid plans if I use Penpot cloud?
Penpot's cloud service offers a free tier, Unlimited plan at $7 per user per month for professionals and medium teams, and Enterprise starting at $950 per month for larger organizations.
SourceBaffle: Who holds the encryption keys?
You do, through your own key management service. Baffle supports bring your own key rather than holding customer keys itself.
Penpot: What platforms does Penpot support?
Penpot runs in the browser, so it works on Windows, Mac, Linux, and any OS with a web browser. No platform-specific downloads required.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- Baffle vs Very Good Security
- Baffle vs HashiCorp Vault
- Baffle vs 1Password
- Baffle vs LastPass
- Baffle vs Mullvad VPN
- Baffle vs Private Internet Access
- Baffle vs IVPN
- Baffle vs TunnelBear
- Baffle vs Enpass
- Baffle vs Passbolt
- Baffle vs Feedzai
- Baffle vs Genetec Security Center
- Baffle vs Tenable Nessus
- Baffle vs Transmit Security
- Baffle vs TrustArc
- Baffle vs Varonis Data Security Platform
- Baffle vs VMware Carbon Black
- Baffle vs Wireshark
- Baffle vs Keycloak
- Baffle vs Soketi
- Baffle vs Visual Studio Code
- Baffle vs Ansible
- Baffle vs Helix
- Baffle vs Bazel
- Baffle vs Eclipse IDE
- Baffle vs Pants Build
- Baffle vs Jitsu
- Baffle vs Notepad++
- Baffle vs Tilt
- Baffle vs Backstage
- Baffle vs StackBlitz
- Baffle vs Steampipe
- Baffle vs WarpBuild
- Baffle vs Webpack
- Baffle vs Avo
- Penpot vs Very Good Security
- Penpot vs HashiCorp Vault
- Penpot vs 1Password
- Penpot vs LastPass
- Penpot vs Mullvad VPN
- Penpot vs Private Internet Access
- Penpot vs IVPN
- Penpot vs TunnelBear
- Penpot vs Enpass
- Penpot vs Passbolt
- Penpot vs Feedzai
- Penpot vs Genetec Security Center
- Penpot vs Tenable Nessus
- Penpot vs Transmit Security
- Penpot vs TrustArc
- Penpot vs Varonis Data Security Platform
- Penpot vs VMware Carbon Black
- Penpot vs Wireshark
- Penpot vs Keycloak
- Penpot vs Soketi
- Penpot vs Visual Studio Code
- Penpot vs Ansible
- Penpot vs Helix
- Penpot vs Bazel
- Penpot vs Eclipse IDE
- Penpot vs Pants Build
- Penpot vs Jitsu
- Penpot vs Notepad++
- Penpot vs Tilt
- Penpot vs Backstage
- Penpot vs StackBlitz
- Penpot vs Steampipe
- Penpot vs WarpBuild
- Penpot vs Webpack
- Penpot vs Avo
