Cybersecurity · head to head
IBM QRadar vs Ory

IBM QRadar
Cybersecurity
Enterprise SIEM licensed by events per second, whose cloud business IBM sold to Palo Alto Networks in 2024.
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -

Ory
Cybersecurity
Open-source identity, authentication, and permissions infrastructure
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Ory has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: IBM QRadar iBM sold the QRadar SaaS business to Palo Alto Networks in 2024 and those customers are being moved to Cortex XSIAM, so anyone buying today is choosing an on-premises product whose vendor has publicly moved the cloud future to a competitor, and the support horizon becomes a contract negotiation rather than an assumption.; Ory production and Growth plans are billed annually ($770/year and $9,350/year), which is a larger upfront commitment than monthly-only competitors.
- They diverge on capability: IBM QRadar covers Offence model, Ory covers Authentication APIs.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which IBM QRadar and Ory actually diverge.
| Attribute | IBM QRadar | Ory |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | On request | Free |
| Pricing model | subscription | usage-based |
| Free tier | No | Yes |
| Founded | 1911 | Unknown |
Identical on both: platforms (Web, Api), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Cybersecurity).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in IBM QRadar
- Offence model
- Network flow analysis
- Device Support Modules
- Ariel query language
- Rules and building blocks
- Deployment topology
- App Exchange
- Use Case Manager
Only in Ory
- Authentication APIs
- Permissions engine
- Machine-to-machine tokens
- B2B organizations
- SAML SSO
- Multi-region deployments
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
IBM QRadar
- A regulated enterprise that must keep log data on premises or in a specific jurisdiction and cannot use a shared SaaS SIEMnot Ory
- A SOC that wants log correlation and network flow analysis in one platform rather than buying an NDR product separatelynot Ory
- An existing QRadar estate deciding whether to stay on premises or accept the migration path to a different vendor's platformnot Ory
- Compliance-driven log retention and reporting where the audit requirement is specific about collection, retention and reportingnot Ory
Ory
- Adding self-hosted or cloud identity to a new productnot IBM QRadar
- Implementing fine-grained permission checksnot IBM QRadar
- Supporting B2B organizations and multi-tenancynot IBM QRadar
- Building machine-to-machine authentication for microservicesnot IBM QRadar
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
IBM QRadar
- IBM sold the QRadar SaaS business to Palo Alto Networks in 2024 and those customers are being moved to Cortex XSIAM, so anyone buying today is choosing an on-premises product whose vendor has publicly moved the cloud future to a competitor, and the support horizon becomes a contract negotiation rather than an assumption.
- Licensing is by events per second and flows per minute, so every additional log source raises the cost directly and teams routinely exclude verbose sources such as DNS, proxy, endpoint and cloud audit logs to stay under the licence, which strips out exactly the data an investigation later needs.
- It needs a dedicated operator: rule tuning, parser work and offence triage are continuous jobs, and an organisation that deploys QRadar without at least one named engineer accumulates thousands of unreviewed offences and a false sense of coverage.
- A log source without a matching Device Support Module arrives unparsed, and writing a custom parser with regular expressions against an unfamiliar payload format is specialist work that can take days per source, which quietly determines which systems ever get monitored.
- On-premises capacity is planned across consoles, processors, collectors and data nodes, so outgrowing the sizing means procuring and racking more appliances rather than changing a subscription tier, and growth becomes a purchasing cycle measured in months.
Ory
- Production and Growth plans are billed annually ($770/year and $9,350/year), which is a larger upfront commitment than monthly-only competitors.
- SAML SSO and multi-region deployments are reserved for the custom-priced Enterprise tier.
- Usage-based pricing across aDAU, M2M tokens, and permission checks makes cost estimation more complex than flat per-MAU billing.
Pricing, plan by plan
IBM QRadar
On request- QRadar SIEMFree
- Event and flow processing
- Offense management
- Threat intelligence
- QRadar CloudFree
- Cloud-native deployment
- Elastic scaling
- Managed infrastructure
- QRadar SuiteFree
- SIEM + SOAR + XDR
- Unified analyst experience
- Federated search
Ory
Free- DeveloperFree
- Community support
- No production environments
- Production$64/month
- $21 monthly credit included
- 1 production environment
- 3 staging environments
- Growth$779/month
- $255 monthly credit included
- 2 production environments
- B2B organizations (max 3)
Which should you pick?
Choose IBM QRadar if
- You need offence model.
- You work on Web, Api.
- You also want network flow analysis.
Choose Ory if
- You need authentication apis.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on web, api.
- You also want permissions engine.
Questions people ask
- Is IBM QRadar or Ory better?
- Neither clearly leads. IBM QRadar starts at On request and Ory at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, IBM QRadar or Ory?
- Ory has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at On request for IBM QRadar and Free for Ory.
- Does IBM QRadar or Ory run on more platforms?
- IBM QRadar runs on Web, Api. Ory runs on web, api.
- Can I use Ory for free?
- Yes. Ory has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. IBM QRadar starts at On request.
- What is IBM QRadar best used for?
- IBM QRadar is most often used for a regulated enterprise that must keep log data on premises or in a specific jurisdiction and cannot use a shared saas siem, a soc that wants log correlation and network flow analysis in one platform rather than buying an ndr product separately, an existing qradar estate deciding whether to stay on premises or accept the migration path to a different vendor's platform, compliance-driven log retention and reporting where the audit requirement is specific about collection, retention and reporting. Of those, a regulated enterprise that must keep log data on premises or in a specific jurisdiction and cannot use a shared saas siem and a soc that wants log correlation and network flow analysis in one platform rather than buying an ndr product separately are not what Ory is typically brought in for.
- What can IBM QRadar do that Ory cannot?
- IBM QRadar covers Offence model, Network flow analysis, Device Support Modules, Ariel query language. Ory covers Authentication APIs, Permissions engine, Machine-to-machine tokens, B2B organizations.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
IBM QRadar: Who owns QRadar now?
It is split. IBM sold the QRadar SaaS assets to Palo Alto Networks in a deal announced in May 2024 and closed that September, and those customers are being migrated to Cortex XSIAM. IBM retains and supports the on-premises product.
Ory: What does Ory cost?
Ory has a free Developer tier, a Production plan at $770/year including a $21 monthly credit, a Growth plan at $9,350/year including a $255 monthly credit, and custom Enterprise pricing.
SourceIBM QRadar: Is QRadar being discontinued?
IBM has committed to continuing support for on-premises customers, including security updates, while offering migration assistance. The cloud product's future belongs to Palo Alto. If you are signing a multi-year term, get the support horizon written into the contract.
Ory: How is usage metered?
Beyond the included credit, Ory charges per average daily active user (aDAU), per machine-to-machine token, and per permission check, with lower per-unit rates on the Growth plan.
SourceIBM QRadar: How is it licensed?
By events per second for logs and flows per minute for network data, with the software or appliance sized to that rate. Add-on modules in the suite are licensed separately.
Ory: What payment methods are supported?
Ory accepts credit cards (Visa, MasterCard, Amex) and bank transfer, processed via Stripe.
SourceIBM QRadar: What is an offence?
QRadar's term for a correlated case. Rules group related events and flows against a common indicator such as a host or user, so an analyst reviews one offence rather than the hundreds of events behind it.
IBM QRadar: Do I need a full-time engineer?
In practice yes for anything beyond a small deployment. Parser development, rule tuning and offence triage do not stop, and the most common failure mode is a well-installed QRadar that nobody has tuned since go-live.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- IBM QRadar vs Bitdefender Total Security
- IBM QRadar vs 1Password
- IBM QRadar vs Norton 360
- IBM QRadar vs LastPass
- IBM QRadar vs Microsoft Sentinel
- IBM QRadar vs Splunk Enterprise Security
- IBM QRadar vs CrowdStrike Falcon
- IBM QRadar vs LogRhythm SIEM
- IBM QRadar vs Recorded Future
- IBM QRadar vs SentinelOne Singularity
- IBM QRadar vs Proofpoint
- IBM QRadar vs Trend Micro Vision One
- IBM QRadar vs Arnica
- IBM QRadar vs Authelia
- IBM QRadar vs Authy
- IBM QRadar vs Baffle
- IBM QRadar vs Beyond Identity
- IBM QRadar vs BeyondTrust
- IBM QRadar vs Logto
- IBM QRadar vs authentik
- IBM QRadar vs Clerk
- IBM QRadar vs Infisical
- IBM QRadar vs Chainguard
- IBM QRadar vs Sigstore
- IBM QRadar vs OWASP ZAP
- IBM QRadar vs Bitwarden
- IBM QRadar vs Semgrep
- IBM QRadar vs Trivy
- IBM QRadar vs Avast One
- IBM QRadar vs Cosign
- IBM QRadar vs CyberGhost VPN
- IBM QRadar vs Dahua Technology
- Ory vs Bitdefender Total Security
- Ory vs 1Password
- Ory vs Norton 360
- Ory vs LastPass
- Ory vs Microsoft Sentinel
- Ory vs Splunk Enterprise Security
- Ory vs CrowdStrike Falcon
- Ory vs LogRhythm SIEM
- Ory vs Recorded Future
- Ory vs SentinelOne Singularity
- Ory vs Proofpoint
- Ory vs Trend Micro Vision One
- Ory vs Arnica
- Ory vs Authelia
- Ory vs Authy
- Ory vs Baffle
- Ory vs Beyond Identity
- Ory vs BeyondTrust
- Ory vs Logto
- Ory vs authentik
- Ory vs Clerk
- Ory vs Infisical
- Ory vs Chainguard
- Ory vs Sigstore
- Ory vs OWASP ZAP
- Ory vs Bitwarden
- Ory vs Semgrep
- Ory vs Trivy
- Ory vs Avast One
- Ory vs Cosign
- Ory vs CyberGhost VPN
- Ory vs Dahua Technology
