Cybersecurity · head to head
Clerk vs IBM QRadar

Clerk
Cybersecurity
Drop-in user authentication and management for developers
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

IBM QRadar
Cybersecurity
Enterprise SIEM licensed by events per second, whose cloud business IBM sold to Palo Alto Networks in 2024.
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Clerk has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Clerk pricing scales with monthly retained users, which can grow expensive quickly for consumer apps with large user bases.; IBM QRadar iBM sold the QRadar SaaS business to Palo Alto Networks in 2024 and those customers are being moved to Cortex XSIAM, so anyone buying today is choosing an on-premises product whose vendor has publicly moved the cloud future to a competitor, and the support horizon becomes a contract negotiation rather than an assumption.
- They diverge on capability: Clerk covers Prebuilt UI components, IBM QRadar covers Offence model.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Clerk and IBM QRadar actually diverge.
| Attribute | Clerk | IBM QRadar |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | Free | On request |
| Pricing model | freemium | subscription |
| Free tier | Yes | No |
| Platforms | web, ios, android, api | Web, Api |
| Founded | Unknown | 1911 |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (Cybersecurity).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Clerk
- Prebuilt UI components
- Organization management
- Multi-factor authentication
- Social sign-on
- Billing
- Enterprise connections
Only in IBM QRadar
- Offence model
- Network flow analysis
- Device Support Modules
- Ariel query language
- Rules and building blocks
- Deployment topology
- App Exchange
- Use Case Manager
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Clerk
- Adding sign-in and user profiles to a web or mobile app quicklynot IBM QRadar
- B2B SaaS apps needing organizations and role-based accessnot IBM QRadar
- Startups wanting prebuilt UI instead of building auth in-housenot IBM QRadar
- Apps needing MFA and fraud detection out of the boxnot IBM QRadar
IBM QRadar
- A regulated enterprise that must keep log data on premises or in a specific jurisdiction and cannot use a shared SaaS SIEMnot Clerk
- A SOC that wants log correlation and network flow analysis in one platform rather than buying an NDR product separatelynot Clerk
- An existing QRadar estate deciding whether to stay on premises or accept the migration path to a different vendor's platformnot Clerk
- Compliance-driven log retention and reporting where the audit requirement is specific about collection, retention and reportingnot Clerk
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Clerk
- Pricing scales with monthly retained users, which can grow expensive quickly for consumer apps with large user bases.
- Enterprise SSO connections beyond the first are billed as add-ons, adding cost for larger organizations.
- The Business tier's extra dashboard seats cost $20/month each, which adds up for larger teams.
- Enterprise-tier features like the 99.99% uptime SLA require annual contracts rather than flexible monthly billing.
IBM QRadar
- IBM sold the QRadar SaaS business to Palo Alto Networks in 2024 and those customers are being moved to Cortex XSIAM, so anyone buying today is choosing an on-premises product whose vendor has publicly moved the cloud future to a competitor, and the support horizon becomes a contract negotiation rather than an assumption.
- Licensing is by events per second and flows per minute, so every additional log source raises the cost directly and teams routinely exclude verbose sources such as DNS, proxy, endpoint and cloud audit logs to stay under the licence, which strips out exactly the data an investigation later needs.
- It needs a dedicated operator: rule tuning, parser work and offence triage are continuous jobs, and an organisation that deploys QRadar without at least one named engineer accumulates thousands of unreviewed offences and a false sense of coverage.
- A log source without a matching Device Support Module arrives unparsed, and writing a custom parser with regular expressions against an unfamiliar payload format is specialist work that can take days per source, which quietly determines which systems ever get monitored.
- On-premises capacity is planned across consoles, processors, collectors and data nodes, so outgrowing the sizing means procuring and racking more appliances rather than changing a subscription tier, and growth becomes a purchasing cycle measured in months.
Pricing, plan by plan
Clerk
Free- HobbyFree
- 50,000 MRU limit per app
- Up to 3 dashboard seats
- Unlimited applications
- Pro$25/month
- 50,000 MRUs included, $0.02/MRU overage
- Up to 3 dashboard seats
- 1 Enterprise Connection included
- Business$300/month
- 50,000 MRUs included with volume pricing
- 10 dashboard seats included
- SOC2 report and priority support
- Enterprise$undefined/month
- Custom pricing, annual billing
- 99.99% uptime SLA
- HIPAA available, dedicated Slack channel
IBM QRadar
On request- QRadar SIEMFree
- Event and flow processing
- Offense management
- Threat intelligence
- QRadar CloudFree
- Cloud-native deployment
- Elastic scaling
- Managed infrastructure
- QRadar SuiteFree
- SIEM + SOAR + XDR
- Unified analyst experience
- Federated search
Which should you pick?
Choose Clerk if
- You need prebuilt ui components.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on web, ios, android, api.
- You also want organization management.
Choose IBM QRadar if
- You need offence model.
- You work on Web, Api.
- You also want network flow analysis.
Questions people ask
- Is Clerk or IBM QRadar better?
- Neither clearly leads. Clerk starts at Free and IBM QRadar at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Clerk or IBM QRadar?
- Clerk has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for Clerk and On request for IBM QRadar.
- Does Clerk or IBM QRadar run on more platforms?
- Clerk runs on web, ios, android, api. IBM QRadar runs on Web, Api.
- Can I use Clerk for free?
- Yes. Clerk has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. IBM QRadar starts at On request.
- What is Clerk best used for?
- Clerk is most often used for adding sign-in and user profiles to a web or mobile app quickly, b2b saas apps needing organizations and role-based access, startups wanting prebuilt ui instead of building auth in-house, apps needing mfa and fraud detection out of the box. Of those, adding sign-in and user profiles to a web or mobile app quickly and b2b saas apps needing organizations and role-based access are not what IBM QRadar is typically brought in for.
- What can Clerk do that IBM QRadar cannot?
- Clerk covers Prebuilt UI components, Organization management, Multi-factor authentication, Social sign-on. IBM QRadar covers Offence model, Network flow analysis, Device Support Modules, Ariel query language.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Clerk: What does Clerk cost?
Clerk's Hobby plan is free with a 50,000 MRU limit; Pro is $25/month ($20/month billed annually), Business is $300/month ($250 annually), and Enterprise uses custom annual pricing.
SourceIBM QRadar: Who owns QRadar now?
It is split. IBM sold the QRadar SaaS assets to Palo Alto Networks in a deal announced in May 2024 and closed that September, and those customers are being migrated to Cortex XSIAM. IBM retains and supports the on-premises product.
Clerk: Is there a free plan and what are its limits?
Yes, the Hobby plan is free with a 50,000 monthly retained user (MRU) limit per app, up to 3 dashboard seats, and unlimited applications, with no credit card required.
SourceIBM QRadar: Is QRadar being discontinued?
IBM has committed to continuing support for on-premises customers, including security updates, while offering migration assistance. The cloud product's future belongs to Palo Alto. If you are signing a multi-year term, get the support horizon written into the contract.
Clerk: How is usage metered?
Clerk meters by monthly retained users (MRUs) — users who return to the app at least a day after signing up — with overage billed at $0.02 per MRU beyond the included 50,000 on paid plans.
SourceIBM QRadar: How is it licensed?
By events per second for logs and flows per minute for network data, with the software or appliance sized to that rate. Add-on modules in the suite are licensed separately.
IBM QRadar: What is an offence?
QRadar's term for a correlated case. Rules group related events and flows against a common indicator such as a host or user, so an analyst reviews one offence rather than the hundreds of events behind it.
IBM QRadar: Do I need a full-time engineer?
In practice yes for anything beyond a small deployment. Parser development, rule tuning and offence triage do not stop, and the most common failure mode is a well-installed QRadar that nobody has tuned since go-live.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Clerk vs Frontegg
- Clerk vs Ory
- Clerk vs Logto
- Clerk vs authentik
- Clerk vs 1Password
- Clerk vs Authelia
- Clerk vs Beyond Identity
- Clerk vs HID Global
- Clerk vs LastPass
- Clerk vs Snyk
- Clerk vs HashiCorp Boundary
- Clerk vs Socure
- Clerk vs SonicWall
- Clerk vs Sophos Intercept X
- Clerk vs Splunk Enterprise Security
- Clerk vs Sticky Password
- Clerk vs Stytch
- Clerk vs Ory Kratos
- Clerk vs Bitdefender Total Security
- Clerk vs Norton 360
- Clerk vs Microsoft Sentinel
- Clerk vs CrowdStrike Falcon
- Clerk vs LogRhythm SIEM
- Clerk vs Recorded Future
- Clerk vs SentinelOne Singularity
- Clerk vs Proofpoint
- Clerk vs Trend Micro Vision One
- Clerk vs Arnica
- Clerk vs Authy
- Clerk vs Baffle
- Clerk vs BeyondTrust
- IBM QRadar vs Frontegg
- IBM QRadar vs Ory
- IBM QRadar vs Logto
- IBM QRadar vs authentik
- IBM QRadar vs 1Password
- IBM QRadar vs Authelia
- IBM QRadar vs Beyond Identity
- IBM QRadar vs HID Global
- IBM QRadar vs LastPass
- IBM QRadar vs Snyk
- IBM QRadar vs HashiCorp Boundary
- IBM QRadar vs Socure
- IBM QRadar vs SonicWall
- IBM QRadar vs Sophos Intercept X
- IBM QRadar vs Splunk Enterprise Security
- IBM QRadar vs Sticky Password
- IBM QRadar vs Stytch
- IBM QRadar vs Ory Kratos
- IBM QRadar vs Bitdefender Total Security
- IBM QRadar vs Norton 360
- IBM QRadar vs Microsoft Sentinel
- IBM QRadar vs CrowdStrike Falcon
- IBM QRadar vs LogRhythm SIEM
- IBM QRadar vs Recorded Future
- IBM QRadar vs SentinelOne Singularity
- IBM QRadar vs Proofpoint
- IBM QRadar vs Trend Micro Vision One
- IBM QRadar vs Arnica
- IBM QRadar vs Authy
- IBM QRadar vs Baffle
- IBM QRadar vs BeyondTrust
