Productivity · head to head
Hubstaff vs Loom

Hubstaff
Productivity
Time tracking and team management for remote teams
- From
- $5.99/month
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Loom has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Hubstaff billed per seat; the pricing page's own proration example states the Team plan costs $10 per seat per month, with fees adjusted when seats are added or removed mid-cycle; Loom free tier capped at 25 total videos with 5-minute maximum recording length per video
- They diverge on capability: Hubstaff covers Time tracking with timer, Loom covers Screen & camera recording.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Hubstaff and Loom actually diverge.
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Hubstaff
- Time tracking with timer
- Activity monitoring
- GPS location tracking
- Screenshots
- Reports and analytics
- Invoicing
- Team management
- Mobile apps
Only in Loom
- Screen & camera recording
- Instant sharing
- Video editing
- Viewer analytics
- Comments & reactions
- Transcription
- Custom CTAs
- Drawing tools
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Hubstaff
- Productivitynot Loom
- Collaborationnot Loom
- Task managementnot Loom
- Organizationnot Loom
Loom
- Asynchronous video communication and screen recordingnot Hubstaff
- Product demonstrations and tutorialsnot Hubstaff
- Meeting transcription and documentationnot Hubstaff
- Team communication and knowledge sharingnot Hubstaff
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Hubstaff
- Billed per seat; the pricing page's own proration example states the Team plan costs $10 per seat per month, with fees adjusted when seats are added or removed mid-cycle
Loom
- Free tier capped at 25 total videos with 5-minute maximum recording length per video
- Free tier limited to 50 workspace members
- AI features (auto-meeting recaps, auto-notes, auto-editing) only available on paid Business+AI and Enterprise tiers
- Video branding (Loom logo) appears on free and Business plan videos; only removed on Business+AI tier
Pricing, plan by plan
Hubstaff
$5.99/month- FreeFree
- Basic time tracking
- Limited to 1 user
- Basic reports
- Starter$5.99/month
- Time tracking
- Team management
- Reports
- Pro$9.99/month
- Everything in Starter
- GPS tracking
- Activity monitoring
Loom
FreeNo published plan breakdown. See the Loom review.
Which should you pick?
Choose Hubstaff if
- You need time tracking with timer.
- You work on Web, IOS, Android, MacOS, Windows.
- You also want activity monitoring.
Choose Loom if
- You need screen & camera recording.
- You want to start without paying.
- You also want instant sharing.
Questions people ask
- Is Hubstaff or Loom better?
- Neither clearly leads. Hubstaff starts at $5.99/month and Loom at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Hubstaff or Loom?
- Loom has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at $5.99/month for Hubstaff and Free for Loom.
- Does Hubstaff or Loom run on more platforms?
- Hubstaff runs on Web, IOS, Android, MacOS, Windows. Loom runs on Web.
- Can I use Loom for free?
- Yes. Loom has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Hubstaff starts at $5.99/month.
- What is Hubstaff best used for?
- Hubstaff is most often used for productivity, collaboration, task management, organization. Of those, productivity and collaboration are not what Loom is typically brought in for.
- What can Hubstaff do that Loom cannot?
- Hubstaff covers Time tracking with timer, Activity monitoring, GPS location tracking, Screenshots. Loom covers Screen & camera recording, Instant sharing, Video editing, Viewer analytics.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Hubstaff vs Todoist
- Hubstaff vs Things 3
- Hubstaff vs OmniFocus 3
- Hubstaff vs Brain.fm
- Hubstaff vs TickTick
- Hubstaff vs Akiflow
- Hubstaff vs Any.do
- Hubstaff vs Focus@Will
- Hubstaff vs Forest
- Hubstaff vs Google Workspace
- Hubstaff vs Remember The Milk
- Hubstaff vs Structured
- Hubstaff vs Tana
- Hubstaff vs Time Doctor
- Hubstaff vs 7-Zip
- Hubstaff vs Bear
- Hubstaff vs Bear Notes
- Hubstaff vs BoldSign
- Hubstaff vs Zoom
- Hubstaff vs Microsoft Teams
- Hubstaff vs RingCentral Video
- Hubstaff vs Slack
- Hubstaff vs Telegram
- Hubstaff vs Webex by Cisco
- Hubstaff vs Chanty
- Hubstaff vs Chatwork
- Hubstaff vs Flock
- Hubstaff vs Google Chat
- Hubstaff vs Grasshopper
- Hubstaff vs Lark
- Hubstaff vs Mattermost
- Hubstaff vs Quo
- Hubstaff vs Rocket.Chat
- Hubstaff vs Signal
- Hubstaff vs TeamViewer
- Hubstaff vs Textline
- Loom vs Todoist
- Loom vs Things 3
- Loom vs OmniFocus 3
- Loom vs Brain.fm
- Loom vs TickTick
- Loom vs Akiflow
- Loom vs Any.do
- Loom vs Focus@Will
- Loom vs Forest
- Loom vs Google Workspace
- Loom vs Remember The Milk
- Loom vs Structured
- Loom vs Tana
- Loom vs Time Doctor
- Loom vs 7-Zip
- Loom vs Bear
- Loom vs Bear Notes
- Loom vs BoldSign
- Loom vs Zoom
- Loom vs Microsoft Teams
- Loom vs RingCentral Video
- Loom vs Slack
- Loom vs Telegram
- Loom vs Webex by Cisco
- Loom vs Chanty
- Loom vs Chatwork
- Loom vs Flock
- Loom vs Google Chat
- Loom vs Grasshopper
- Loom vs Lark
- Loom vs Mattermost
- Loom vs Quo
- Loom vs Rocket.Chat
- Loom vs Signal
- Loom vs TeamViewer
- Loom vs Textline

