APIs · head to head
Hoppscotch vs NocoDB

Hoppscotch
APIs
Open-source API development ecosystem with web-based REST client
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

NocoDB
Spreadsheets
Open-source no-code database platform with REST and GraphQL APIs
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Hoppscotch open-source project with no published commercial support plans or pricing; NocoDB the free cloud tier is capped at 3 editor seats, 1,000 records and 1 GB of storage
- They diverge on capability: Hoppscotch covers REST Client, NocoDB covers REST API.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Hoppscotch and NocoDB actually diverge.
| Attribute | Hoppscotch | NocoDB |
|---|---|---|
| Platforms | Web, Desktop, Self-hosted | Cloud, Self-hosted, Docker |
| Category | APIs | Spreadsheets |
| Founded | 2019 | 2020 |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), pricing model (freemium), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Hoppscotch
- REST Client
- WebSocket
- gRPC Client
- GitHub
- Documentation tools
- CI/CD
- Web support
- Desktop support
Only in NocoDB
- REST API
- GraphQL API
- No-code database
- Multiple SQL databases
- Webhooks
- Automation
- Cloud support
- Docker support
Both cover
- Self-hosted support
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Hoppscotch
- API Developmentnot NocoDB
- API Gatewaynot NocoDB
- API Testingnot NocoDB
- API Documentationnot NocoDB
- Microservicesnot NocoDB
NocoDB
- Self-hosting an open source alternative to a spreadsheet databasenot Hoppscotch
- Putting a spreadsheet interface over an existing Postgres or MySQL databasenot Hoppscotch
- Building internal tools on structured data with an APInot Hoppscotch
- Team bases with per-field and per-table permissions on the paid tiersnot Hoppscotch
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Hoppscotch
- Open-source project with no published commercial support plans or pricing
- No official enterprise tier or SLA information disclosed
NocoDB
- The free cloud tier is capped at 3 editor seats, 1,000 records and 1 GB of storage
- Records are the metering unit on cloud, so Plus covers 50K and Business 300K rather than scaling by seat alone
- Row-level security, audit log retention and team hierarchy require the Scale tier
- SCIM provisioning and air-gapped deployment are Enterprise only
- The self-hosted Community edition is unlimited on records and seats but does without workflows, scripts and dashboards, which start at the paid self-hosted tiers
Pricing, plan by plan
Hoppscotch
Free- Open SourceFree
- Full REST client
- WebSocket support
- Community
- Teams$8/monthly
- Team collaboration
- Cloud sync
- Priority support
NocoDB
Free- Free (Cloud)Free
- 3 editor seats
- 10 commenter seats
- 1 GB storage
- Plus$12/month
- Unlimited seats
- 50,000 records
- 20 GB storage
- Business$24/month
- Unlimited seats
- 300,000 records
- 100 GB storage
- Scale$45/month
- Minimum 3 seats required
- 1,000,000 records
- 150 GB storage
Which should you pick?
Choose Hoppscotch if
- You need rest client.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Desktop, Self-hosted.
- You also want websocket.
Choose NocoDB if
- You need rest api.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Cloud, Self-hosted, Docker.
- You also want graphql api.
Questions people ask
- Is Hoppscotch or NocoDB better?
- Neither clearly leads. Hoppscotch starts at Free and NocoDB at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Hoppscotch or NocoDB?
- Hoppscotch starts at Free and NocoDB at Free.
- Does Hoppscotch or NocoDB run on more platforms?
- Hoppscotch runs on Web, Desktop, Self-hosted. NocoDB runs on Cloud, Self-hosted, Docker.
- Can I use Hoppscotch for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Hoppscotch best used for?
- Hoppscotch is most often used for api development, api gateway, api testing, api documentation. Of those, api development and api gateway are not what NocoDB is typically brought in for.
- What can Hoppscotch do that NocoDB cannot?
- Hoppscotch covers REST Client, WebSocket, gRPC Client, GitHub. NocoDB covers REST API, GraphQL API, No-code database, Multiple SQL databases. Both handle Self-hosted support.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Hoppscotch: Is Hoppscotch free to use for API development?
Yes, Hoppscotch is a completely free, open-source API development ecosystem. There are no subscription fees, license costs, or registration requirements to access the core platform.
SourceNocoDB: Is NocoDB free?
Yes, NocoDB offers a free cloud plan with 3 editor seats, 1,000 records, 1 GB storage, and 1,000 API calls per month. A free self-hosted Community edition with unlimited records and seats is also available.
SourceHoppscotch: Can I deploy Hoppscotch on my own infrastructure?
As an open-source project, Hoppscotch can be self-hosted and deployed on your own infrastructure. The source code is available for customization and deployment in private environments.
SourceNocoDB: How much does NocoDB Plus cost?
NocoDB Plus costs $12 per seat per month (billed annually) or $15 per seat per month (monthly). For unlimited seats, it costs $108/month annually or $180/month monthly. Plus includes 50,000 records, 20 GB storage, and 100,000 API calls per month.
SourceNocoDB: What is the difference between NocoDB Plus and Business plans?
Plus ($12/seat annual) includes 50,000 records and 100,000 API calls per month. Business ($24/seat annual) includes 300,000 records, 1,000,000 API calls per month, external database connections, SAML SSO, and table/field permissions.
SourceNocoDB: Can I self-host NocoDB for free?
Yes, NocoDB's Community edition is free for self-hosting. It includes unlimited records, storage, and seats, with all core features including webhooks and 6 view types.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- Hoppscotch vs PocketBase
- Hoppscotch vs Appwrite
- Hoppscotch vs Hasura
- Hoppscotch vs Sanity
- Hoppscotch vs Bruno
- Hoppscotch vs REST Client VSCode
- Hoppscotch vs Directus
- Hoppscotch vs Kong
- Hoppscotch vs Parse Server
- Hoppscotch vs Strapi
- Hoppscotch vs Tyk
- Hoppscotch vs curl
- Hoppscotch vs Aiia
- Hoppscotch vs Akana
- Hoppscotch vs Akoya
- Hoppscotch vs Apidog
- Hoppscotch vs Astra
- Hoppscotch vs Asyncapi
- Hoppscotch vs APITable
- Hoppscotch vs Teable
- Hoppscotch vs Looker
- Hoppscotch vs SeaTable
- Hoppscotch vs Tableau
- Hoppscotch vs Metabase
- Hoppscotch vs Redash
- Hoppscotch vs Mathesar
- Hoppscotch vs Baserow
- Hoppscotch vs Budibase
- Hoppscotch vs Fibery
- Hoppscotch vs Apache Superset
- Hoppscotch vs Coefficient
- Hoppscotch vs Cube Software
- Hoppscotch vs Quadratic
- Hoppscotch vs Rowy
- NocoDB vs PocketBase
- NocoDB vs Appwrite
- NocoDB vs Hasura
- NocoDB vs Sanity
- NocoDB vs Bruno
- NocoDB vs REST Client VSCode
- NocoDB vs Directus
- NocoDB vs Kong
- NocoDB vs Parse Server
- NocoDB vs Strapi
- NocoDB vs Tyk
- NocoDB vs curl
- NocoDB vs Aiia
- NocoDB vs Akana
- NocoDB vs Akoya
- NocoDB vs Apidog
- NocoDB vs Astra
- NocoDB vs Asyncapi
- NocoDB vs APITable
- NocoDB vs Teable
- NocoDB vs Looker
- NocoDB vs SeaTable
- NocoDB vs Tableau
- NocoDB vs Metabase
- NocoDB vs Redash
- NocoDB vs Mathesar
- NocoDB vs Baserow
- NocoDB vs Budibase
- NocoDB vs Fibery
- NocoDB vs Apache Superset
- NocoDB vs Coefficient
- NocoDB vs Cube Software
- NocoDB vs Quadratic
- NocoDB vs Rowy
