Cloud · head to head
Hetzner Cloud vs Nixpacks

Nixpacks
Developer Tools
Build system that turns a source directory into an OCI image, now in maintenance mode
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Hetzner Cloud cost-Optimized plans are shown as currently unavailable; Nixpacks the project is in maintenance mode with no commits on the default branch since May 2026 and no release since October 2025, so support for new language versions arrives only if someone forks it.
- They diverge on capability: Hetzner Cloud covers Cloud servers, Nixpacks covers Automatic language detection.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Hetzner Cloud and Nixpacks actually diverge.
| Attribute | Hetzner Cloud | Nixpacks |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | usage-based | Open source, no licence fee |
| Platforms | Web, Api, Cli | Linux, macOS, CLI, Docker |
| Category | Cloud | Developer Tools |
| Founded | 1997 | Unknown |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Hetzner Cloud
- Cloud servers
- Block storage
- Object storage
- Load balancers
- Networks
- Firewalls
- Floating IPs
- Backups
Only in Nixpacks
- Automatic language detection
- No Dockerfile required
- Nix toolchains
- Configuration escape hatches
- Docker layer caching
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Hetzner Cloud
- Low-cost virtual servers for development and testingnot Nixpacks
- European hosting with data held in Germany or Finlandnot Nixpacks
- Workloads with heavy egress, where included traffic mattersnot Nixpacks
- Self-hosting applications away from the hyperscalersnot Nixpacks
Nixpacks
- Understanding the build behaviour of a platform that adopted Nixpacks before it was frozennot Hetzner Cloud
- Producing container images from a polyglot monorepo where nobody wants to own several Dockerfilesnot Hetzner Cloud
- Reproducing an existing Railway build locally while planning a migration to Railpacknot Hetzner Cloud
- Comparing what a Nix based builder does differently from a buildpack before choosing a successornot Hetzner Cloud
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Hetzner Cloud
- Cost-Optimized plans are shown as currently unavailable
- The shared-resource tiers are positioned for variable usage and development rather than sustained production workloads
- Regions are limited to Germany, Finland, the United States and Singapore, so latency to other markets is a real constraint
- The uptime guarantee is 99.9 percent, below what the large hyperscalers offer on comparable services
- Support is 24/7 by email, without a phone channel
Nixpacks
- The project is in maintenance mode with no commits on the default branch since May 2026 and no release since October 2025, so support for new language versions arrives only if someone forks it.
- Build determinism is softer than it appears, because providers pin a nixpkgs archive commit and bumping that archive silently moves compiler and runtime versions underneath a build that looks unchanged.
- Caching is limited to Docker layers rather than a content addressed graph, so a small change early in the build invalidates everything after it, which is exactly the limitation Railpack was rewritten to fix.
- Images carry Nix store layers and come out larger than an equivalent tuned Dockerfile or buildpack output, which costs registry storage and slows cold pulls on scale-out.
- There is no specification, no vendor neutral governance and no third party provider ecosystem, so a single company was able to redirect strategy and leave every downstream user with a frozen build tool.
Pricing, plan by plan
Hetzner Cloud
Free- CX11$3.29/month
- 1 vCPU
- 1GB RAM
- 25GB SSD
- CX21$6.59/month
- 2 vCPU
- 4GB RAM
- 40GB SSD
Nixpacks
Free- NixpacksFree
- MIT licensed, no usage limits
- No commercial edition and no support contract
- In maintenance mode, superseded by Railpack
Which should you pick?
Choose Hetzner Cloud if
- You need cloud servers.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Api, Cli.
- You also want block storage.
Choose Nixpacks if
- You need automatic language detection.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, macOS, CLI, Docker.
- You also want no dockerfile required.
Questions people ask
- Is Hetzner Cloud or Nixpacks better?
- Neither clearly leads. Hetzner Cloud starts at Free and Nixpacks at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Hetzner Cloud or Nixpacks?
- Hetzner Cloud starts at Free and Nixpacks at Free.
- Does Hetzner Cloud or Nixpacks run on more platforms?
- Hetzner Cloud runs on Web, Api, Cli. Nixpacks runs on Linux, macOS, CLI, Docker.
- Can I use Hetzner Cloud for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Hetzner Cloud best used for?
- Hetzner Cloud is most often used for low-cost virtual servers for development and testing, european hosting with data held in germany or finland, workloads with heavy egress, where included traffic matters, self-hosting applications away from the hyperscalers. Of those, low-cost virtual servers for development and testing and european hosting with data held in germany or finland are not what Nixpacks is typically brought in for.
- What can Hetzner Cloud do that Nixpacks cannot?
- Hetzner Cloud covers Cloud servers, Block storage, Object storage, Load balancers. Nixpacks covers Automatic language detection, No Dockerfile required, Nix toolchains, Configuration escape hatches.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Hetzner Cloud: What types of cloud plans does Hetzner Cloud offer?
Hetzner Cloud offers Shared Resource plans (Cost-Optimized and Regular Performance) for development and testing, and Dedicated Resource plans (General Purpose) for business applications. Plans are available with a price calculator on their website.
SourceNixpacks: Should I start a new project on Nixpacks?
No. The documentation and README both say it is in maintenance mode and recommend Railpack. Choose Railpack, Cloud Native Buildpacks or a Dockerfile instead.
Hetzner Cloud: What is included with Hetzner Cloud servers?
Every cloud server comes with free one-click apps like Docker, WordPress, Nextcloud, and GitLab. All servers include stateful firewalls at no additional cost, networking capabilities, APIs, and CLI tools.
SourceNixpacks: Will my existing Nixpacks builds stop working?
Not immediately. Pinned nixpkgs archives keep resolving, so builds continue. What you lose is support for new runtime major versions and any fix for a provider bug.
Hetzner Cloud: Where are Hetzner Cloud servers located?
Hetzner Cloud servers are available in Germany, Finland, Singapore, and the USA, with data centers in Falkenstein, Nuremberg, Helsinki, Hillsboro (Oregon), Ashburn (Virginia), and Singapore.
SourceNixpacks: What replaces it?
Railpack, also from Railway and also MIT licensed, rebuilt as a BuildKit custom frontend for finer grained caching and parallel steps.
Hetzner Cloud: What uptime guarantee does Hetzner Cloud provide?
Hetzner Cloud provides an SLA with 99.9% guaranteed uptime and clearly defined credits in case of malfunction. They also offer 24/7 support by email for business-critical workloads.
SourceNixpacks: Is it still open source?
Yes, MIT, and the repository is not archived. Being open source does not help much when nobody is merging provider updates.
Related pages
More on Hetzner Cloud
Other head to heads
- Hetzner Cloud vs DigitalOcean
- Hetzner Cloud vs Contabo
- Hetzner Cloud vs AWS (Amazon Web Services)
- Hetzner Cloud vs Grafana Cloud
- Hetzner Cloud vs Neon
- Hetzner Cloud vs Linode
- Hetzner Cloud vs Vultr
- Hetzner Cloud vs Scaleway
- Hetzner Cloud vs Wasabi
- Hetzner Cloud vs Zeabur
- Hetzner Cloud vs Encore
- Hetzner Cloud vs Google Cloud Platform
- Hetzner Cloud vs Vagrant
- Hetzner Cloud vs VictoriaMetrics
- Hetzner Cloud vs Akamai
- Hetzner Cloud vs Alibaba Cloud
- Hetzner Cloud vs Buildah
- Hetzner Cloud vs Depot
- Hetzner Cloud vs Earthly
- Hetzner Cloud vs Cloud Native Buildpacks
- Hetzner Cloud vs Dagger
- Hetzner Cloud vs Nx Cloud
- Hetzner Cloud vs Tilt
- Hetzner Cloud vs Blacksmith
- Hetzner Cloud vs WarpBuild
- Hetzner Cloud vs Namespace
- Hetzner Cloud vs Rust
- Hetzner Cloud vs Ona (formerly Gitpod)
- Hetzner Cloud vs Bazel
- Hetzner Cloud vs ConfigCat
- Hetzner Cloud vs Cortex
- Hetzner Cloud vs Deep Code
- Hetzner Cloud vs Deno
- Hetzner Cloud vs Fig
- Nixpacks vs DigitalOcean
- Nixpacks vs Contabo
- Nixpacks vs AWS (Amazon Web Services)
- Nixpacks vs Grafana Cloud
- Nixpacks vs Neon
- Nixpacks vs Linode
- Nixpacks vs Vultr
- Nixpacks vs Scaleway
- Nixpacks vs Wasabi
- Nixpacks vs Zeabur
- Nixpacks vs Encore
- Nixpacks vs Google Cloud Platform
- Nixpacks vs Vagrant
- Nixpacks vs VictoriaMetrics
- Nixpacks vs Akamai
- Nixpacks vs Alibaba Cloud
- Nixpacks vs Buildah
- Nixpacks vs Depot
- Nixpacks vs Earthly
- Nixpacks vs Cloud Native Buildpacks
- Nixpacks vs Dagger
- Nixpacks vs Nx Cloud
- Nixpacks vs Tilt
- Nixpacks vs Blacksmith
- Nixpacks vs WarpBuild
- Nixpacks vs Namespace
- Nixpacks vs Rust
- Nixpacks vs Ona (formerly Gitpod)
- Nixpacks vs Bazel
- Nixpacks vs ConfigCat
- Nixpacks vs Cortex
- Nixpacks vs Deep Code
- Nixpacks vs Deno
- Nixpacks vs Fig

