Cloud · head to head
Heroku vs Packer
The short version
- Only Packer has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Heroku there is no free dyno tier; the cheapest Eco dyno is $5 per month; Packer packer 1.10.0 and later is licensed under the Business Source License 1.1 with IBM Corporation as licensor, not an OSI open source licence
- They diverge on capability: Heroku covers Git-based deployment, Packer covers Image building.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Heroku and Packer actually diverge.
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (Cloud).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Heroku
- Git-based deployment
- Buildpacks
- Dynos (containers)
- Add-ons marketplace
- Postgres database
- Environment variables
- Logging
- API
Only in Packer
- Image building
- Multi-platform support
- Provisioners
- Builders
- Post-processors
- Variables
- Data sources
- Validation
Both cover
- Cloud deployment
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Heroku
- Application hostingnot Packer
- Database as a servicenot Packer
- CI/CD pipelinesnot Packer
- API deploymentnot Packer
Packer
- Building identical machine images for multiple clouds from one templatenot Heroku
- Baking golden AMIs and VM images into a CI pipelinenot Heroku
- Creating immutable infrastructure artifacts consumed by Terraformnot Heroku
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Heroku
- There is no free dyno tier; the cheapest Eco dyno is $5 per month
- Eco dynos sleep after 30 minutes of inactivity, are restricted to personal accounts and allow only 2 process types
- Free SSL and 10 process types start at the Basic dyno at $7 per month
- Private and Shield dyno types require a Private Space, which is billed on top of the dynos
- Private Space dynos start at $250 per month for Private-M and $500 per month for Private-L
- Dyno prices are per dyno per month, so an app with several process types multiplies the bill
Packer
- Packer 1.10.0 and later is licensed under the Business Source License 1.1 with IBM Corporation as licensor, not an OSI open source licence
- The Additional Use Grant forbids offering Packer to third parties on a hosted or embedded basis in a paid product that competes with IBM's paid versions of Packer
- Each version converts to the MPL 2.0 Change License only four years after that version is first published, and the Change Date is set separately per version
- Alternative licensing for uses outside the grant must be arranged with the licensor rather than taken under the public licence
Pricing, plan by plan
Heroku
$5/month- Eco Dyno$5/month
- 0.5 GB RAM
- Git/Docker deploy
- Custom domains
- Basic Dyno$7/month
- 0.5 GB RAM
- Always-on
- Free SSL
- Standard-1X Dyno$25/month
- 0.5 GB RAM
- Horizontal scaling
- App metrics
- Standard-2X Dyno$50/month
- 1 GB RAM
- Horizontal scaling
- App metrics
Packer
Free- Open SourceFree
- Multi-platform image building
- Template-driven
- Provisioner support
Which should you pick?
Choose Heroku if
- You need git-based deployment.
- You work on Web, Api, Workers.
- You also want buildpacks.
Choose Packer if
- You need image building.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, Windows, Mac.
- You also want multi-platform support.
Questions people ask
- Is Heroku or Packer better?
- Neither clearly leads. Heroku starts at $5/month and Packer at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Heroku or Packer?
- Packer has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at $5/month for Heroku and Free for Packer.
- Does Heroku or Packer run on more platforms?
- Heroku runs on Web, Api, Workers. Packer runs on Linux, Windows, Mac.
- Can I use Packer for free?
- Yes. Packer has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Heroku starts at $5/month.
- What is Heroku best used for?
- Heroku is most often used for application hosting, database as a service, ci/cd pipelines, api deployment. Of those, application hosting and database as a service are not what Packer is typically brought in for.
- What can Heroku do that Packer cannot?
- Heroku covers Git-based deployment, Buildpacks, Dynos (containers), Add-ons marketplace. Packer covers Image building, Multi-platform support, Provisioners, Builders. Both handle Cloud deployment.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Heroku: How much does Heroku cost?
Heroku dyno pricing starts at $5 per month USD for the Eco tier (with 30-minute inactivity sleep), $7 per month for Basic (always-on), and scales up to $1,500 per month for Performance-2XL with 126 GB RAM.
SourcePacker: How much does HashiCorp Packer cost?
Packer does not publish specific pricing on its website. The open-source Packer tool is free, while HCP Packer (HashiCorp's cloud-hosted version) offers a free trial, but detailed pricing requires contacting HashiCorp.
SourceHeroku: What is the cheapest always-on Heroku plan?
The Basic Dyno at $7 per month USD is Heroku's cheapest always-on container option. It provides 0.5 GB RAM, free SSL, and support for 10 process types.
SourceHeroku: How is Heroku Postgres priced?
Heroku Postgres Essential tier (shared resources) starts at $5-$20 per month for 1-32 GB disk. Standard tier (dedicated) ranges $50-$12,000 per month. Premium, Private, Shield, and Advanced tiers offer higher performance at corresponding prices.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- Heroku vs Coolify
- Heroku vs Neon
- Heroku vs Dokku
- Heroku vs AWS (Amazon Web Services)
- Heroku vs DigitalOcean
- Heroku vs Grafana Cloud
- Heroku vs Render
- Heroku vs Porter
- Heroku vs SST
- Heroku vs Encore
- Heroku vs Zeabur
- Heroku vs Railway
- Heroku vs minikube
- Heroku vs Northflank
- Heroku vs Oracle Cloud
- Heroku vs Orca Security
- Heroku vs OpenTelemetry
- Heroku vs Pulumi
- Heroku vs Serverless Framework
- Heroku vs Rancher
- Heroku vs Puppet
- Heroku vs Buildah
- Heroku vs Terragrunt
- Heroku vs Portworx
- Heroku vs Cilium
- Heroku vs Contabo
- Heroku vs Crossplane
- Heroku vs containerd
- Packer vs Coolify
- Packer vs Neon
- Packer vs Dokku
- Packer vs AWS (Amazon Web Services)
- Packer vs DigitalOcean
- Packer vs Grafana Cloud
- Packer vs Render
- Packer vs Porter
- Packer vs SST
- Packer vs Encore
- Packer vs Zeabur
- Packer vs Railway
- Packer vs minikube
- Packer vs Northflank
- Packer vs Oracle Cloud
- Packer vs Orca Security
- Packer vs OpenTelemetry
- Packer vs Pulumi
- Packer vs Serverless Framework
- Packer vs Rancher
- Packer vs Puppet
- Packer vs Buildah
- Packer vs Terragrunt
- Packer vs Portworx
- Packer vs Cilium
- Packer vs Contabo
- Packer vs Crossplane
- Packer vs containerd


