Cloud & Infrastructure · head to head
Heroku vs Pulumi

Pulumi
Cloud & Infrastructure
Modern infrastructure as code using programming languages
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Pulumi has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Heroku there is no free dyno tier; the cheapest Eco dyno is $5 per month; Pulumi the free Individual plan allows one user and one concurrent stack update
- They diverge on capability: Heroku covers Git-based deployment, Pulumi covers Multi-language support.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Heroku and Pulumi actually diverge.
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (Cloud & Infrastructure).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Heroku
- Git-based deployment
- Buildpacks
- Dynos (containers)
- Add-ons marketplace
- Postgres database
- Environment variables
- Logging
- API
Only in Pulumi
- Multi-language support
- Multi-cloud
- State management
- Secrets management
- RBAC
- Stacks
- Automation API
- Policy as Code
Both cover
- GitHub
- Cloud deployment
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Heroku
- Deploying and scaling web applications with git push and no server administrationnot Pulumi
- Running managed Postgres, Redis and Kafka as attached data servicesnot Pulumi
- Isolated production environments in a Private Space for regulated workloadsnot Pulumi
Pulumi
- Defining cloud infrastructure as code in TypeScript, Python, Go, C# or Java rather than a DSLnot Heroku
- Managing Pulumi state and secrets in a hosted backend instead of self-managed storagenot Heroku
- Policy, drift detection and deployment workflows for platform engineering teamsnot Heroku
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Heroku
- There is no free dyno tier; the cheapest Eco dyno is $5 per month
- Eco dynos sleep after 30 minutes of inactivity, are restricted to personal accounts and allow only 2 process types
- Free SSL and 10 process types start at the Basic dyno at $7 per month
- Private and Shield dyno types require a Private Space, which is billed on top of the dynos
- Private Space dynos start at $250 per month for Private-M and $500 per month for Private-L
- Dyno prices are per dyno per month, so an app with several process types multiplies the bill
Pulumi
- The free Individual plan allows one user and one concurrent stack update
- The Team plan is $40 per month base including 40 credits, and caps the organisation at 10 users
- SAML/SSO, RBAC, audit logs and drift detection require the Enterprise plan at $400 per month base
- The per-resource rate rises from $0.1825 per resource per month on Team to $0.365 on Enterprise, so upgrading raises the unit price as well as the base fee
- Managed secrets are billed separately at $0.50 per secret per month on Team and $0.75 on Enterprise
- Self-hosting, SCIM user sync, audit log export and 24x7 support are only in Business Critical, which is custom priced with no published rate
- Team includes up to 500 resources and Enterprise up to 2,000, with everything beyond billed on demand as credits
Pricing, plan by plan
Heroku
$7/month- Hobby$7/month
- 512MB RAM
- Shared CPU
- 1 web dyno
- Standard$50/month
- 512MB RAM
- Dedicated CPU
- Automatic scaling
Pulumi
Free- Pulumi CommunityFree
- Open source
- Community support
- Self-hosted
- Pulumi Cloud$10/month
- Hosted backend
- Team collaboration
- RBAC
Which should you pick?
Choose Heroku if
- You need git-based deployment.
- You work on Web, Api, Workers.
- You also want buildpacks.
Choose Pulumi if
- You need multi-language support.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, Windows, Mac, Api.
- You also want multi-cloud.
Questions people ask
- Is Heroku or Pulumi better?
- Neither clearly leads. Heroku starts at $7/month and Pulumi at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Heroku or Pulumi?
- Pulumi has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at $7/month for Heroku and Free for Pulumi.
- Does Heroku or Pulumi run on more platforms?
- Heroku runs on Web, Api, Workers. Pulumi runs on Linux, Windows, Mac, Api.
- Can I use Pulumi for free?
- Yes. Pulumi has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Heroku starts at $7/month.
- What is Heroku best used for?
- Heroku is most often used for deploying and scaling web applications with git push and no server administration, running managed postgres, redis and kafka as attached data services, isolated production environments in a private space for regulated workloads. Of those, deploying and scaling web applications with git push and no server administration and running managed postgres, redis and kafka as attached data services are not what Pulumi is typically brought in for.
- What can Heroku do that Pulumi cannot?
- Heroku covers Git-based deployment, Buildpacks, Dynos (containers), Add-ons marketplace. Pulumi covers Multi-language support, Multi-cloud, State management, Secrets management. Both handle GitHub, Cloud deployment.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Heroku vs Grafana Cloud
- Heroku vs Neon
- Heroku vs DigitalOcean
- Heroku vs AWS (Amazon Web Services)
- Heroku vs Lambda (AWS Serverless)
- Heroku vs Deno Deploy
- Heroku vs Hetzner Cloud
- Heroku vs Linode
- Heroku vs Packer
- Heroku vs Render
- Heroku vs Upstash
- Heroku vs Vagrant
- Heroku vs Vultr
- Heroku vs Akamai
- Heroku vs Alibaba Cloud
- Heroku vs Chef
- Heroku vs Contabo
- Pulumi vs Grafana Cloud
- Pulumi vs Neon
- Pulumi vs DigitalOcean
- Pulumi vs AWS (Amazon Web Services)
- Pulumi vs Lambda (AWS Serverless)
- Pulumi vs Deno Deploy
- Pulumi vs Hetzner Cloud
- Pulumi vs Linode
- Pulumi vs Packer
- Pulumi vs Render
- Pulumi vs Upstash
- Pulumi vs Vagrant
- Pulumi vs Vultr
- Pulumi vs Akamai
- Pulumi vs Alibaba Cloud
- Pulumi vs Chef
- Pulumi vs Contabo

