APIs · head to head
Hasura vs Rook

Hasura
APIs
GraphQL engine that instantly creates production-ready GraphQL API from databases
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

Rook
Cloud
Kubernetes operator that deploys and manages Ceph storage clusters
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Hasura active model definition: model/command accessed more than 1,000 times monthly; Rook rook automates Ceph but does not abstract it, so an incident still demands Ceph expertise, and organisations without it end up hiring consultants at exactly the wrong moment.
- They diverge on capability: Hasura covers GraphQL API, Rook covers Ceph operator.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Hasura and Rook actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Hasura
- GraphQL API
- Real-time subscriptions
- Access control
- PostgreSQL
- MySQL
- Webhooks
- REST APIs
- Cloud support
Only in Rook
- Ceph operator
- Block, file and object
- Erasure coding
- CSI driver
- Automated upgrades
- Multi-cluster mirroring
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Hasura
- Automatic GraphQL API generation from existing databasesnot Rook
- Real-time data subscriptions for modern applicationsnot Rook
- Backend infrastructure for web and mobile applicationsnot Rook
- Event-triggered webhooks for database changesnot Rook
Rook
- An on-premises Kubernetes platform needing block, shared filesystem and S3 storage without buying three productsnot Hasura
- A team that already runs Ceph and wants its lifecycle managed declaratively inside Kubernetesnot Hasura
- A large cluster where three-way replication overhead is unaffordable and erasure coding is requirednot Hasura
- An organisation building a private cloud that cannot use managed cloud storage services for residency reasonsnot Hasura
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Hasura
- Active model definition: model/command accessed more than 1,000 times monthly
- Private DDN requires Base or Advanced plan
Rook
- Rook automates Ceph but does not abstract it, so an incident still demands Ceph expertise, and organisations without it end up hiring consultants at exactly the wrong moment.
- There is no vendor and no SLA; the realistic commercial support routes are IBM Red Hat OpenShift Data Foundation or an independent Ceph consultancy, both of which change the cost picture entirely.
- Ceph is resource hungry, needing substantial memory and dedicated disks per OSD, so the hardware cost of a properly sized cluster is often underestimated.
- Recovery and rebalancing after a disk or node failure generates heavy background input and output that can degrade application performance for hours, which surprises teams sizing for steady state.
- Minimum viable clusters require several nodes with several disks each, so it is impractical at small scale and the entry hardware cost exceeds simpler alternatives.
Pricing, plan by plan
Hasura
Free- DDN FreeFree
- Unlimited models
- 1 supergraph developer
- 15-minute observability retention
- DDN Base$5/month
- Per active model billing
- Unlimited developers
- 30-day observability retention
- DDN Advanced$30/month
- Per active model billing
- Federated collaboration
- Multi-repo CI/CD
Rook
Free- RookFree
- Apache 2.0 licensed, no licence fee
- Graduated CNCF project
- Community support via GitHub and Slack only
Which should you pick?
Choose Hasura if
- You need graphql api.
- You want to start without paying.
- You also want real-time subscriptions.
Choose Rook if
- You need ceph operator.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, Kubernetes.
- You also want block, file and object.
Questions people ask
- Is Hasura or Rook better?
- Neither clearly leads. Hasura starts at Free and Rook at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Hasura or Rook?
- Hasura starts at Free and Rook at Free.
- Does Hasura or Rook run on more platforms?
- Hasura runs on Web. Rook runs on Linux, Kubernetes.
- Can I use Hasura for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Hasura best used for?
- Hasura is most often used for automatic graphql api generation from existing databases, real-time data subscriptions for modern applications, backend infrastructure for web and mobile applications, event-triggered webhooks for database changes. Of those, automatic graphql api generation from existing databases and real-time data subscriptions for modern applications are not what Rook is typically brought in for.
- What can Hasura do that Rook cannot?
- Hasura covers GraphQL API, Real-time subscriptions, Access control, PostgreSQL. Rook covers Ceph operator, Block, file and object, Erasure coding, CSI driver.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Hasura: How much does Hasura cost?
Hasura DDN Free is free. DDN Base starts at $5/active model/month, and DDN Advanced starts at $30/active model/month.
SourceRook: Who supports it in production?
Nobody by default. IBM sells Red Hat OpenShift Data Foundation, which is supported Rook and Ceph, and independent consultancies sell Ceph support. Decide this before deployment.
Hasura: What is an active model in Hasura pricing?
An active model is defined as any model or command accessed more than 1,000 times monthly.
SourceRook: Does it need Ceph knowledge?
Yes. Rook handles deployment and routine operations, but troubleshooting a degraded cluster is a Ceph skill and there is no way around it.
Hasura: Is there a free version of Hasura?
Yes, Hasura DDN Free is always free and includes unlimited models, 1 supergraph developer, and 15-minute observability retention.
SourceRook: Can it replace an object storage appliance?
Functionally yes, through the RADOS gateway, but you take on the operations that an appliance vendor would otherwise carry.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Hasura vs PocketBase
- Hasura vs Parse Server
- Hasura vs Appwrite
- Hasura vs GraphQL Apollo
- Hasura vs GraphQL Playground
- Hasura vs Directus
- Hasura vs Asyncapi
- Hasura vs Janus Gateway
- Hasura vs Strapi
- Hasura vs Gravitee
- Hasura vs Bruno
- Hasura vs KeystoneJS
- Hasura vs Lithic
- Hasura vs Stoplight
- Hasura vs Swan
- Hasura vs Temenos Transact
- Hasura vs Token.io
- Hasura vs Treasury Prime
- Hasura vs OpenEBS
- Hasura vs Qovery
- Hasura vs Coolify
- Hasura vs Portworx
- Hasura vs Vultr
- Hasura vs Dokku
- Hasura vs Scaleway
- Hasura vs SST
- Hasura vs AWS (Amazon Web Services)
- Hasura vs Neon
- Hasura vs Wasabi
- Hasura vs Podman
- Hasura vs Azure Functions
- Hasura vs Deno Deploy
- Hasura vs Hetzner Cloud
- Hasura vs Infracost
- Hasura vs Lambda
- Hasura vs Linode
- Rook vs PocketBase
- Rook vs Parse Server
- Rook vs Appwrite
- Rook vs GraphQL Apollo
- Rook vs GraphQL Playground
- Rook vs Directus
- Rook vs Asyncapi
- Rook vs Janus Gateway
- Rook vs Strapi
- Rook vs Gravitee
- Rook vs Bruno
- Rook vs KeystoneJS
- Rook vs Lithic
- Rook vs Stoplight
- Rook vs Swan
- Rook vs Temenos Transact
- Rook vs Token.io
- Rook vs Treasury Prime
- Rook vs OpenEBS
- Rook vs Qovery
- Rook vs Coolify
- Rook vs Portworx
- Rook vs Vultr
- Rook vs Dokku
- Rook vs Scaleway
- Rook vs SST
- Rook vs AWS (Amazon Web Services)
- Rook vs Neon
- Rook vs Wasabi
- Rook vs Podman
- Rook vs Azure Functions
- Rook vs Deno Deploy
- Rook vs Hetzner Cloud
- Rook vs Infracost
- Rook vs Lambda
- Rook vs Linode
