Technology · head to head
Greenhouse vs Terragrunt

Terragrunt
Cloud
The Open Source IaC Orchestrator Platform Teams Trust
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Terragrunt has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Greenhouse core plan lacks talent discovery and contact lookups; Terragrunt additional complexity layer on top of Terraform
- They diverge on capability: Greenhouse covers Applicant tracking, Terragrunt covers Infrastructure orchestration.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Greenhouse and Terragrunt actually diverge.
| Attribute | Greenhouse | Terragrunt |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | On request | Free |
| Pricing model | quote | Unknown |
| Free tier | No | Yes |
| Platforms | Web, Ios, Android, Api | AWS, Azure, GCP |
| Category | Technology | Cloud |
| Founded | 2012 | Unknown |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Greenhouse
- Applicant tracking
- Interview scheduling
- Scorecard system
- Job board posting
- Candidate CRM
- Reporting & analytics
- Offer management
- EEO compliance
Only in Terragrunt
- Infrastructure orchestration
- Run Queue
- DRY configuration
- Automated hooks
- Infrastructure catalog
- Least-privilege access
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Greenhouse
- Enterprise hiring and recruiting automationnot Terragrunt
- Multi-location and multi-team talent acquisitionnot Terragrunt
- Structured interview process managementnot Terragrunt
Terragrunt
- Organizing Terraform code across multiple environmentsnot Greenhouse
- Automating infrastructure deployment workflowsnot Greenhouse
- Implementing infrastructure as code templates for developer self-servicenot Greenhouse
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Greenhouse
- Core plan lacks talent discovery and contact lookups
- Core plan lacks email automation and applicant texting
- Plus plan lacks resume anonymisation and application limits
- Plus plan lacks audit logging and developer tools
- Pricing customised by hiring volume and company size, not published
- Only Pro tier offers audit logs and developer sandbox
Terragrunt
- Additional complexity layer on top of Terraform
- Requires understanding of Terraform concepts
- Paid tier pricing not clearly published
Pricing, plan by plan
Greenhouse
On requestNo published plan breakdown. See the Greenhouse review.
Terragrunt
Free- Open SourceFree
- Terragrunt CLI - completely free
- Community support
- Terragrunt Scale FreeFree
- Free CI/CD pipeline
- Unlimited runs and resources
- For up to 25 infrastructure units
- Terragrunt Scale Paid$undefined/custom
- Volume pricing for more than 25 infrastructure units
- Enterprise support
Which should you pick?
Choose Greenhouse if
- You need applicant tracking.
- You work on Web, Ios, Android, Api.
- You also want interview scheduling.
Choose Terragrunt if
- You need infrastructure orchestration.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on AWS, Azure, GCP.
- You also want run queue.
Questions people ask
- Is Greenhouse or Terragrunt better?
- Neither clearly leads. Greenhouse starts at On request and Terragrunt at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Greenhouse or Terragrunt?
- Terragrunt has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at On request for Greenhouse and Free for Terragrunt.
- Does Greenhouse or Terragrunt run on more platforms?
- Greenhouse runs on Web, Ios, Android, Api. Terragrunt runs on AWS, Azure, GCP.
- Can I use Terragrunt for free?
- Yes. Terragrunt has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Greenhouse starts at On request.
- What is Greenhouse best used for?
- Greenhouse is most often used for enterprise hiring and recruiting automation, multi-location and multi-team talent acquisition, structured interview process management. Of those, enterprise hiring and recruiting automation and multi-location and multi-team talent acquisition are not what Terragrunt is typically brought in for.
- What can Greenhouse do that Terragrunt cannot?
- Greenhouse covers Applicant tracking, Interview scheduling, Scorecard system, Job board posting. Terragrunt covers Infrastructure orchestration, Run Queue, DRY configuration, Automated hooks.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Greenhouse: How much does Greenhouse cost?
Greenhouse does not publish specific pricing. The company states that pricing is customized based on your hiring needs, hiring volume, organizational complexity, and required features.
SourceTerragrunt: Is Terragrunt free?
Yes, the Terragrunt CLI is completely free and open source. Terragrunt Scale offers a free tier for up to 25 infrastructure units.
SourceGreenhouse: What are the Greenhouse pricing tiers?
Greenhouse offers three plan levels: Core (basic hiring structure), Plus (multi-location optimization), and Pro (complex enterprise hiring). Exact pricing requires contacting Greenhouse for a custom quote.
SourceTerragrunt: What is the difference between Terragrunt and Terraform?
Terragrunt is an orchestration layer on top of Terraform that handles state management, DRY principles, and deployment automation without replacing Terraform itself.
SourceGreenhouse: Do all Greenhouse tiers include the same features?
No. Core includes sourcing and scheduling, Plus adds automation and texting, and Pro adds enterprise data configuration and audit logs. All tiers can be customized.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- Greenhouse vs Asana
- Greenhouse vs ClickUp
- Greenhouse vs Linear
- Greenhouse vs Figma
- Greenhouse vs Kubernetes
- Greenhouse vs Notion
- Greenhouse vs Datadog
- Greenhouse vs Monday.com
- Greenhouse vs Terraform
- Greenhouse vs Docker
- Greenhouse vs Google Chrome
- Greenhouse vs Intercom
- Greenhouse vs Mozilla Firefox
- Greenhouse vs Okta
- Greenhouse vs PostHog
- Greenhouse vs Redis
- Greenhouse vs Supabase
- Greenhouse vs Amplitude
- Greenhouse vs Grafana Cloud
- Greenhouse vs Neon
- Greenhouse vs DigitalOcean
- Greenhouse vs AWS (Amazon Web Services)
- Greenhouse vs Pulumi
- Greenhouse vs Fly.io
- Greenhouse vs Anyscale
- Greenhouse vs Fireworks AI
- Greenhouse vs Podman
- Greenhouse vs Railway
- Greenhouse vs Render
- Greenhouse vs Vault
- Greenhouse vs Wiz
- Greenhouse vs Beam Cloud
- Greenhouse vs Cerebrium
- Greenhouse vs DeepInfra
- Greenhouse vs Go
- Greenhouse vs Azure Functions
- Terragrunt vs Asana
- Terragrunt vs ClickUp
- Terragrunt vs Linear
- Terragrunt vs Figma
- Terragrunt vs Kubernetes
- Terragrunt vs Notion
- Terragrunt vs Datadog
- Terragrunt vs Monday.com
- Terragrunt vs Terraform
- Terragrunt vs Docker
- Terragrunt vs Google Chrome
- Terragrunt vs Intercom
- Terragrunt vs Mozilla Firefox
- Terragrunt vs Okta
- Terragrunt vs PostHog
- Terragrunt vs Redis
- Terragrunt vs Supabase
- Terragrunt vs Amplitude
- Terragrunt vs Grafana Cloud
- Terragrunt vs Neon
- Terragrunt vs DigitalOcean
- Terragrunt vs AWS (Amazon Web Services)
- Terragrunt vs Pulumi
- Terragrunt vs Fly.io
- Terragrunt vs Anyscale
- Terragrunt vs Fireworks AI
- Terragrunt vs Podman
- Terragrunt vs Railway
- Terragrunt vs Render
- Terragrunt vs Vault
- Terragrunt vs Wiz
- Terragrunt vs Beam Cloud
- Terragrunt vs Cerebrium
- Terragrunt vs DeepInfra
- Terragrunt vs Go
- Terragrunt vs Azure Functions

