Technology · head to head
Greenhouse vs Namespace

Greenhouse
Technology
Hiring software for growing companies
- From
- On request
- Free plan
- No

Namespace
Developer Tools
The dev platform for the next 100 billion commits
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes
The short version
- Only Namespace has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Greenhouse core plan lacks talent discovery and contact lookups; Namespace developer plan is pay-as-you-go only; minimum usage unclear
- They diverge on capability: Greenhouse covers Applicant tracking, Namespace covers Devboxes.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Greenhouse and Namespace actually diverge.
| Attribute | Greenhouse | Namespace |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | On request | Free |
| Pricing model | quote | Unknown |
| Free tier | No | Yes |
| Platforms | Web, Ios, Android, Api | Cloud, Mac, Windows, Linux |
| Category | Technology | Developer Tools |
| Founded | 2012 | Unknown |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Greenhouse
- Applicant tracking
- Interview scheduling
- Scorecard system
- Job board posting
- Candidate CRM
- Reporting & analytics
- Offer management
- EEO compliance
Only in Namespace
- Devboxes
- GitHub Actions runners
- Docker builds
- Cross-invocation caching
- NVMe storage
- High-speed networking
- Multiple OS support
- Bazel and Turborepo support
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Greenhouse
- Enterprise hiring and recruiting automationnot Namespace
- Multi-location and multi-team talent acquisitionnot Namespace
- Structured interview process managementnot Namespace
Namespace
- Providing AI coding agents with cloud-based development environmentsnot Greenhouse
- Accelerating CI builds with faster GitHub Actions runnersnot Greenhouse
- Distributing builds across teams with managed infrastructurenot Greenhouse
- Scaling development velocity for monorepo organizationsnot Greenhouse
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Greenhouse
- Core plan lacks talent discovery and contact lookups
- Core plan lacks email automation and applicant texting
- Plus plan lacks resume anonymisation and application limits
- Plus plan lacks audit logging and developer tools
- Pricing customised by hiring volume and company size, not published
- Only Pro tier offers audit logs and developer sandbox
Namespace
- Developer plan is pay-as-you-go only; minimum usage unclear
- Team plan $100/mo is competitive but usage limits may be tight
- Devbox pricing separate at $0.004/minute could add up quickly
- Enterprise plan requires custom sales conversation
Pricing, plan by plan
Greenhouse
On requestNo published plan breakdown. See the Greenhouse review.
Namespace
Free- DeveloperFree
- Pay-as-you-go
- On-demand compute
- Docker builds
- Team$100/month
- 100,000 unit minutes
- 1,000 Docker builds
- Everything in Developer
- Business$250/month
- 250,000 unit minutes
- 2,500 Docker builds
- Everything in Team
- Enterprise$undefined/custom
- Custom compute/Docker build limits
- Audit log export
- Enterprise SSO
Which should you pick?
Choose Greenhouse if
- You need applicant tracking.
- You work on Web, Ios, Android, Api.
- You also want interview scheduling.
Choose Namespace if
- You need devboxes.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Cloud, Mac, Windows, Linux.
- You also want github actions runners.
Questions people ask
- Is Greenhouse or Namespace better?
- Neither clearly leads. Greenhouse starts at On request and Namespace at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Greenhouse or Namespace?
- Namespace has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at On request for Greenhouse and Free for Namespace.
- Does Greenhouse or Namespace run on more platforms?
- Greenhouse runs on Web, Ios, Android, Api. Namespace runs on Cloud, Mac, Windows, Linux.
- Can I use Namespace for free?
- Yes. Namespace has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Greenhouse starts at On request.
- What is Greenhouse best used for?
- Greenhouse is most often used for enterprise hiring and recruiting automation, multi-location and multi-team talent acquisition, structured interview process management. Of those, enterprise hiring and recruiting automation and multi-location and multi-team talent acquisition are not what Namespace is typically brought in for.
- What can Greenhouse do that Namespace cannot?
- Greenhouse covers Applicant tracking, Interview scheduling, Scorecard system, Job board posting. Namespace covers Devboxes, GitHub Actions runners, Docker builds, Cross-invocation caching.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Greenhouse: How much does Greenhouse cost?
Greenhouse does not publish specific pricing. The company states that pricing is customized based on your hiring needs, hiring volume, organizational complexity, and required features.
SourceNamespace: How is compute usage metered on the Developer plan?
Developer plan uses pay-as-you-go billing. Devboxes bill at $0.004 per minute. Storage and caching services have separate usage-based fees. A 30-day free trial is available to test usage patterns.
SourceGreenhouse: What are the Greenhouse pricing tiers?
Greenhouse offers three plan levels: Core (basic hiring structure), Plus (multi-location optimization), and Pro (complex enterprise hiring). Exact pricing requires contacting Greenhouse for a custom quote.
SourceNamespace: What is the difference between Team and Business plans?
Team ($100/mo) includes 100,000 unit minutes and 1,000 Docker builds with email support. Business ($250/mo) includes 250,000 unit minutes, 2,500 Docker builds, and high concurrency with a dedicated Slack channel.
SourceGreenhouse: Do all Greenhouse tiers include the same features?
No. Core includes sourcing and scheduling, Plus adds automation and texting, and Pro adds enterprise data configuration and audit logs. All tiers can be customized.
SourceNamespace: Can Namespace support AI coding agents?
Yes, Namespace Devboxes are specifically designed as feature-rich development environments for AI coding agents, with full tooling and performance optimization.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- Greenhouse vs Linear
- Greenhouse vs Asana
- Greenhouse vs ClickUp
- Greenhouse vs Figma
- Greenhouse vs Aha!
- Greenhouse vs Okta
- Greenhouse vs Eclipse
- Greenhouse vs Postgres
- Greenhouse vs Amplitude
- Greenhouse vs Mixpanel
- Greenhouse vs Pendo
- Greenhouse vs PostHog
- Greenhouse vs Postman
- Greenhouse vs Raycast
- Greenhouse vs Superhuman
- Greenhouse vs Vim
- Greenhouse vs Whimsical
- Greenhouse vs Apache Hadoop
- Greenhouse vs Ona (formerly Gitpod)
- Greenhouse vs CodeSandbox
- Greenhouse vs WarpBuild
- Greenhouse vs Depot
- Greenhouse vs Blacksmith
- Greenhouse vs Earthly
- Greenhouse vs Daytona
- Greenhouse vs Ansible
- Greenhouse vs Garden
- Greenhouse vs ConfigCat
- Greenhouse vs Nix
- Greenhouse vs OpsLevel
- Greenhouse vs StackBlitz
- Greenhouse vs Steampipe
- Greenhouse vs Tilt
- Greenhouse vs Webpack
- Greenhouse vs Avo
- Namespace vs Linear
- Namespace vs Asana
- Namespace vs ClickUp
- Namespace vs Figma
- Namespace vs Aha!
- Namespace vs Okta
- Namespace vs Eclipse
- Namespace vs Postgres
- Namespace vs Amplitude
- Namespace vs Mixpanel
- Namespace vs Pendo
- Namespace vs PostHog
- Namespace vs Postman
- Namespace vs Raycast
- Namespace vs Superhuman
- Namespace vs Vim
- Namespace vs Whimsical
- Namespace vs Apache Hadoop
- Namespace vs Ona (formerly Gitpod)
- Namespace vs CodeSandbox
- Namespace vs WarpBuild
- Namespace vs Depot
- Namespace vs Blacksmith
- Namespace vs Earthly
- Namespace vs Daytona
- Namespace vs Ansible
- Namespace vs Garden
- Namespace vs ConfigCat
- Namespace vs Nix
- Namespace vs OpsLevel
- Namespace vs StackBlitz
- Namespace vs Steampipe
- Namespace vs Tilt
- Namespace vs Webpack
- Namespace vs Avo
